Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... regular criminal case no. 100/2015, pending on the file of judicial magistrate first class, paithan, under sections 9, 39, 50 and 51 of the wild life [protection] act, 1972 [for the sake of brevity, hereinafter referred to as said act ]. 3. it appears that, on 1st december, 2014, nandu sakharam sonowane, police constable, paithan police station, taluka paithan, district aurangabad, lodged a complaint with ..... , it would be apposite to reproduce herein below the provisions of section 55 of the wild life [protection] act, 1972, which reads thus: 55. cognizance of offences. no court shall take cognizance of any offence against this act except on the complaint of any person other than - (a) the director of wild life preservation or any other officer authorised in this behalf by the central government; or .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... judicial magistrate, osmanabad. the c.j.m. had acquitted the petitioner of the offences punishable under section 9, 39, 44, 49 r/w. 51 of wild life protection act, 1972. 3. it is the case of forest department that accused jalindar mangrule had created barbed wire fencing around his agricultural land and supply of electricity was given ..... procedure required to be followed for filing the complaint is not followed. 12. the sessions court has considered some provisions like section 57 of the wildlife protection act which raises some presumptions. the sessions court has considered the order issued by the government to appoint some officers, who can investigate the crime and file ..... as the officers are authorize to make investigation and file the chargesheet, there was no necessity to file complaint after getting authorization under section 55 of the act. the sessions court has referred one report dated 14.4.2005 submitted by r.f.o. regarding the offence in which the intention was expressed to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... such area falls. explanation.- the expressions "national parks" and "sanctuaries" used in this section shall have the same meanings respectively, assigned to them under the wild-life (protection) act, 1972." 11. thus, areas of national parks and sanctuaries are excluded. again, panchayat also has to adhere to the prescriptions contained in the working plan, ..... possession of salai and kad gum. the deputy conservator of forest, yawal division, under powers as per section 72(1)(c) of indian forest act, 1927 (forest act for short) was entitled to search the gum which had been stored. (b) the affidavit for respondents claims that the transit permit was of 22 ..... section 4(1) of the maharashtra transfer of ownership of minor forest produce in the scheduled areas and the maharashtra minor forest produce (regulation of trade) (amendment) act, 1997 reads as under: - "4. ownership of minor forest - procedure to vest panchayat. (1) the ownership of minor forest produce found in the government .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... or development of public utility including roads, other than irrigation project and power project; (d) national park and sanctuary declared under the provisions of the wild life protection act, 1972; (e) an industrial project, that is to say, setting up of production, distribution or service industry or providing any service, in ..... departments, public sector undertakings, local self government, government aided institutions and co-operative societies specified under section 73a of the maharashtra co-operative societies act, 1960 there shall be not less than five per cent priority quota for the employment of nominees of the affected persons. (b) the beneficiary ..... lands belonging to the petitioners for lendi irrigation project, they are affected persons within the meaning of provisions of maharashtra project affected persons rehabilitation act, 1999. the subsequent acquisition of remaining lands belonging to the petitioners for resettlement of project affected persons of the same project is a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... the citizens owe the duty under article 51-a(g) of the constitution to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures. apart from the above, there is the water (prevention of pollution) act, 1974 of which, the statement of object and reasons reads, as follows: ..... f) that children are given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity and that childhood and youth are protected against exploitation and against moral and material abandonment. 47. duty of the state to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living and to ..... .- (1) the state shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the national life. (2) the state shall, in particular, strive to minimise the inequalities in income, and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... the citizens owe the duty under article 51-a(g) of the constitution to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures. apart from the above, there is the water (prevention of pollution) act, 1974 of which, the statement of object and reasons reads, as follows: ..... f) that children are given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity and that childhood and youth are protected against exploitation and against moral and material abandonment. 47. duty of the state to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living and to ..... .- (1) the state shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the national life. (2) the state shall, in particular, strive to minimise the inequalities in income, and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... purpose other than reforestations save and except any work relating or ancillary to conservation, development and management of forests and wild life. it is, therefore, not difficult to find that, an act of encroachment on a forest land by any private individual or any other organisation not owned, managed or controlled by ..... good to regularise encroachment over forest land in contravention of section 2 of forest (conservation) act, 1980? (c) whether civil suit is maintainable to protect the encroachment over forest land in contravention of section 2 of forest (conservation) act, 1980? 2. genesis of this reference lies in regular civil suit no. 153/ ..... must be understood according to its dictionary meaning. this description covers all statutory recognised forests, whether designated as reserved, protected or otherwise for the purpose of section 2(i) of the forest conservation act. the term forest land , occurring in section 2, will not only include forest as understood in the dictionary .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... form an opinion. i find that this portion of rule 16(2) is not compatible with the intent and object of the act, as is summarized in the preamble of the said act, as it gives no protection to such non-permanent employee, who are left to the unmerciful decision of the management which is shrouded in secrecy. the ..... same time, it would enable the employee to disclose his decision whether to continue in employment or set out an explanation for his absence. this would render some protection to a non-permanent employee under rule 16(2) and eliminate secrecy in the presumption of abandonment by the employer. 86. in so far as the material aspects ..... 1964 sc 1272], xii. shahoodul haque vs. the registrar, cooperative societies [air 1974 sc 1896], xiii. m. venugopal vs. the divisional manager, lic [air 1994 sc 1343], xiv. life corporation of india vs. raghvendra sheshgiri rao kulkarni [air 1998 sc 327], xv. dipti prakash banerjee vs. satyendra nath [1999 (3) scc 60], xvi. state of bombay vs. pandurang .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... that he was released by the juvenile justice board on 15th january, 2011, under section 15 (1) (a) of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, ( the act of 2000 for short). on receiving the said certificate, respondent no.4, vide letter dated 31st march, 2016, informed the petitioner that since he was ..... muddepal property if produced, be returned to the concern police station to produce in a trial against major offender. 9. the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2015, ( the act of 2015 for short) came into force on 1st january, 2016. since the offences alleged against the petitioner were committed on 22.07.2010 and ..... disqualification attached to a conviction of a juvenile in conflict with law would have the effect of opening the doors for him of a descent and disciplined civilized life. the order holding him guilty of an offence would not disqualify him from getting any job to which otherwise he would be legitimately entitled. 11. sub-section .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... which is also pending in the court of the chief judicial magistrate, beed. the applicant has also filed proceedings under section 12 of the women's domestic violence protection act, 2005 against the respondent-husband and his relatives in the court of the judicial magistrate, first class, beed and same is pending. 4. it is the case ..... instituted by the wife. therefore, already the respondent-husband is attending the proceedings at beed. the contention of the respondent-husband that, there is threat to his life and he was beaten by the father and relatives of the applicant is concerned, if such incident happens in future, he will be at liberty to file appropriate ..... divorce. it is further case of the applicant that, said divorce petition is filed by the respondent-husband on false and fabricated grounds including the very wild and ugly allegations of the illicit relations between applicant and present respondent no.2. it is case of the applicant that, such allegations are nothing but .....
Tag this Judgment!