Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 17c cultivation of specified plants without licence prohibited Court: uttaranchal

State of U.P. Vs. Keshar Singh

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2006CriLJ503

..... magistrate, purola district uttarkashi in criminal case no. 374 of 1980 by which the learned magistrate convicted and sentenced the accused respondent under section 51 of wild life (protection) act, 1972 to undergo imprisonment for two years and a fine of rs. 2000/- and default of payment of fine to further undergo 3 months s.i ..... respondent and perused the record.4. it was contended on behalf of the state that section 5 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 empowers all the assistant wild life wardens to file complaints against offences under the said act in the competent courts. it was further contended that notification no. 4003/xiv-3-67-74 dated april 30 ..... 30, 1976 is as under :-in exercise of the powers under section 55 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972, (act no. 53 of 1972), the governor is pleased to authorize all the assistant conservators of forests, all the assistant wild life wardens, all the range officers all the deputy superintendents of police, all the sub-inspectors .....

Dr. Satish JaIn Etc. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1172

..... officers of the orissa state forest department) alleging that they had falsely implicated him for offences under the orissa forest act, 1972 and the wild life (protection) act, 1972. he further alleged that being not content with the said illegal acts, they seriously assaulted him thereby committing offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 325, 506 and 386 read with ..... a large quantity of ivory was seized from the complainant and he could not produce any material to justify the possession thereof. according to them, the acts of search, seizure and arrest were done in pursuance of their official duty and they could not be proceeded against without necessary sanction as contemplated under section ..... and misappropriation of the amount as indicated above. as such no offence is made out under section 406 i. p. c.12. wrongful or illegal act of cheating may give again rise to a criminal action when it is clear from the complaint or shown statements that essential ingredients are made out. from .....

Pancham Das Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another

Court : Uttaranchal

..... of the charge-sheet. 5) the second limb of argument of learned counsel for the applicant is that the provision of section 50(4) of the wild life (protection) act, 1972, has been observed by breach. the said provision is also being reproduced here-in-below for reference: any person detained, or things seized under ..... , 49b, 50, 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972. cognizance was taken on said charge-sheet and the accused was summoned to face the trial for the selfsame offences. aggrieved against the same, present application ..... as also the proceedings of criminal case no. 1641 of 2008, state of uttarakhand vs pancham das, under sections 9, 49b, 51 and 52 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972, pending in the court of judicial magistrate (i class), vikasnagar, district dehradun. 2) a charge-sheet is submitted against the present applicant under sections 9 .....

Lachham Singh S/O Sri Ratan Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

..... to six months rigorous imprisonment under section 304-a of i.p.c., and rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months under section 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972, and further maintained the sentence of fine.4. learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that the revisionist only prays for reduction in sentence awarded by ..... 304-a of i.p.c., and simple imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of rs. 5,000/- under section 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972. the revisionist preferred criminal appeal no. 26 of 2004, before the sessions judge, nainital, against his conviction and the sentence. learned sessions judge after ..... raja ram, ram bharose and gopal bahadur, relating to offences punishable under section 304-a of i.p.c., and one punishable under section 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972. as per the prosecution story, soon after the accidental death of tari ram, the aforesaid accused killed the deer. after investigation charge sheet was filed .....

Mohd. Hazi Rafeeq Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2006Utr18

..... of saw mills. the principal chief conservator of forest has only acted in accordance with article 48a of the constitution of india which is extracted hereunder:48a. protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wild life.-- the state shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country.further, article 51a(g) of the constitution ..... of india casts a duty on every citizen 'to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life and to have compassion for living creatures'. hence, forests have to be preserved and protected even at the cost of the business interest of the petitioner.7. in this context, it is also .....

Hari Singh Chilwal Vs. District Magistrate and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... natural regeneration through management of forest fires and controlled grazing by excluding from grazing at least one fifth area annually by rotation;(j) to ensure conservation of wild life;4. the powers of the management committee are given under rule 20 of the rules, which reads as follows:20. powers of management committee:management committee ..... , to the best advantage of the right holders, keeping in view the silvicultural health and sustainable resource management of the village forest/panchayati forest;(g) to protect the forests from illicit felling of trees, lopping, fire and other damages and conserve them;(h) to ensure that catchments areas of water sources are adequately ..... to which any such assignment is made may be provided or other forest-produce or pasture, and their duties for the protection and improvement of such forest.(3) all the provisions of this act relating to reserved forests shall (so far as they are not inconsistent with the rules so made) apply to village-forests .....

Reliance Life Insurance Company Limited, Maharashtra Vs. Alka Siddhu

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

b.c. kandpal, president: 1. this appeal, under section 15 of the consumer protection act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 11.06.2012 passed by the district forum, udham singh nagar in consumer complaint no. 112 of 2010, whereby the district forum has ..... consumer complaint, are that late sh. sanjay siddhu, the deceased husband of the complainant smt. alka siddhu, during his lifetime, had purchased an insurance policy from the appellant reliance life insurance company limited known as reliance wealth + health plan. the proposal form for the said policy was submitted on 22.09.2008. the sum assured under the said policy was ..... the appellant and during the validity of the said policy, he passed away. the appellant insurance company has denied the claim of the complainant on the ground that the life assured was a chronic alcoholic and smoker and he suppressed this fact while submitting the proposal form for the policy in question and deliberately gave wrong answers to the question .....

Life Insurance Corporation of India Through Its Divisional Manager and ...

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... .c. kandpal, president: 1. this is insurers appeal under section 15 of the consumer protection act, 1986 against the order dated 20.09.2010 passed by the district forum, haridwar in consumer ..... granted to the policyholder subject to certain limitations. 9. the honble national commission in the case of asha garg and others vs. life insurance corporation of india; iv (2009) cpj 92 (nc), has held that revival operates as new contract and that revival of ..... policy. 8. learned counsel for the insurance company pressed into service the decision rendered in the case of ahmedunnisa begum vs. the life insurance corporation of india, hyderabad; air 1981 andhra pradesh 50, wherein it was held that the revival of an insurance policy is ..... the case, are that the complainant had purchased a jeevan anand (with profits) (with accident benefit) policy from opposite party no. 2 life insurance corporation of india, 200, civil lines, roorkee for assured sum on 1,00,000/- on 28.03.2003. the said policy carried .....

Gurukul Kangri Vishwa Vidyala Haridwar Vs. Ankit Walia, Haridwar

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... order dated 22.02.2013 in the above manner. aggrieved by the order, the university-opposite party through its registrar has filed this appeal under section 15 of the consumer protection act, 1986. 3. we have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material placed on record. 4. the learned counsel for the appellant-opposite party submitted that the .....

R.D. Bhardwaj Vs. Smt. Saroj Jain

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC481

..... must be guarded against.9. the rent control legislations are heavily loaded in favour of the tenants treating them as weaker sections of the society requiring legislative protection against exploitation and unscrupulous devices of greedy landlords. the legislative intent has to be respected by courts, while interpreting the laws. but it is being ..... he adopts to be guided with are bound to have an impact upon his activities which in their turn necessarily influence the need and requirement of his life. accordingly, having given my indepth consideration to the question as to what requirement of a landlord for his personal occupation of the building should be ..... requiring additional accommodation.'paragraph 23- 'writ petition allowed. petitioners may approach the prescribed authority (respondent no. 2) to deliver the possession as contemplated under the act. there will be no order as to costs.'41. further, the appeal having been made by the landlord, it will be open for the petitioner to avail .....