Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 17c cultivation of specified plants without licence prohibited Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 1 results (0.076 seconds)

Rajendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1998Raj165; 1998(1)WLC277

..... indian craftsmen for their livelihood. the petitioner has traced out the history of wild life protection, staling there firstly the animal protection act of 1912 was promulgated which merely concerned to prevent the killing of wild birds and animals and later on for a comprehensive and practical legislation to protect the indian wild life, the present wild life (protection) act, 1972 was enacted with the statement of objects inter alia as under:'the ..... has been reflected in the statement of objects and reasons of the amendment bill as under:--'the wild life (protection) act. 1972 provides for the protection of wild animals and birds.2. in the implementation of the act over 18 years, the need for amendment of certain provisions of the act to bring them in line with the requirements of the present limes has been fell. the indian .....

Om Prakash Choudhary and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2005Raj18; RLW2005(1)Raj167; 2004(4)WLC388

..... has been raised in the administrative area where other buildings are already existing. it was canvassed that neither any provision of the wild life protection act, 1972 nor forest (conservation) act, 1980 have been violated by the construction of the interpretation center. it was also contended that the construction of the new interpretation ..... for the improvement of the habitat. the chief wild life warden is the only competent authority under section 33 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and the permission of the central government is not required. in spite of the fact that the chief wild life warden is the competent authority approval for construction of ..... is required for constructing interpretation center, the position can also be examined with reference to section 33 of the wildlife (protection) act, 1972. section 33 reads as follows :'the chief wild life warden shall be the authority who shall control, manage and maintain all sanctuaries and for that purpose, within the limits .....

Satish Ravilal Shah Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1999CriLJ727

..... 11-10-1998, police station, mathania under sections 147, 148 r/w 149 & 201, ipc, sections 9, 39, 51 & 52, wild life (protection) act, 1972 and 27 arms act.2. the brief facts are that wild life conservator,. jodhpur, sent a written report on 11-10-98 that a case fir no. 93 (26) dated 2-10-1998 is under ..... also forwarded the copy of the statement. a case was registered under sections 147, 148 read with 149 & 201, ipc and sections 9, 39, 51 & 52 wild life (protection) act, 1972 at police station, mathania. the petitioners apprehend their arrest in this case. hence, they have moved bail applications.3. harish dulani has disclosed in his statement ..... true facts and an attempt has been made to falsely implicate the petitioner. it was vehemently argued that no court can take cognizance of any offence against wild life (protection) act, 1972 except on the complaint of the persons mentioned in section 55 and the police officer authorised by the state government.5. learned counsel on behalf .....

Ashwini Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2002CriLJ179

..... chittorgarh in criminal case no. 110/ 99 by which he framed charges against the petitioner for offence under sections 40, 49 read with section 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1972).2. it arises in the following circumstances:(i) on 7-6-1996 shri bhanwar singh, sho, police station chanderiya dist. chittorgarh lodged a first ..... order dated 25-10-2000 by which charges were framed against the accused petitioner ashwini kumar bhardwaj for offence under sections 40, 49 read with section 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 are set aside and the complaint filed by the sho, police station handeriya is quashed. ..... case for offence under sections 40, 49, read with section 51 of the act of 1972 prima facie is not found.(ii) by virtue of section 55 of the act of 1972, cognizance of any offence under this act can be taken only on the complaint of the chief wild life warden or such other officer as the state government may authorise in this .....

Maharaj Singh Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1341

..... tractor and trolley were seized by the police in connection with offence under section 29/51 of the wild life protection act. the allegation against him is that he illegally transported the chambal sand (bajri) from chambal crocodile area. it is further contended that on his application for release of the said ..... .4.2005 passed by the learned civil judge (jr. div.)- cum- judicial magistrate, bari, district dholpur in criminal case no. 206/2005 for offence under section 29/51 of the wild life protection act has been upheld after modification.2. learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that he is the owner of tractor no. rj 11-r7 49g alongwith trolley and the said .....

Rahul and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

1. petitioners were convicted by the trial court under sections 9, 17, 27, 29, 31 32 read with section 51 of the wild life protection act, 1972 to a imprisonment of one year and a fine of rs.5,000/-. being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred. it was argued before the first appellate ..... petition was preferred before this court on 05.10.2006. 3. registry pointed out that revision petition is barred by limitation and no application under section 5 of the limitation act has been filed. application for condonation of delay has not been filed despite grant of time by this court on 06.11.2008 and again on 17.01.2009. 4 .....

Panchi Nath Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2006CriLJ361; RLW2006(2)Raj1357; 2005(4)WLC790

..... civil judge (jr. divn.) & judicial magistrate, kishanganj, district baran, whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced under section 9, schedule-ii 2/51 of the wild life protection act, 1972 to one year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of rs. 300/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo for one month rigorous imprisonment. ..... sufficient and delay ought to have been condoned, but the learned appellate court committed an illegality in dismissing the application under section 5 of the limitation act as well as appeal itself being barred by period of limitation.4. learned public prosecutor opposes the revision petition.5. i have considered the rival ..... petition and set aside the impugned judgment dated 30-6-2005 passed by the district & sessions judge, baran. the application under section 5 of the limitation act filed by the petitioner for condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the district & sessions judge, baran is allowed. the matter is remanded back to .....

Girraj Goyal and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(4)Raj2875

..... to the extent of preservation of tigers and other wildlife, regulating the tourists and vehicles in the park and other subsidiary matters.3. the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (for short 'the act of 1972') to provide for the protection of wild animals, birds and plants and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto with a view to ensuring the ecological and environmental security of ..... baffled and looking at the gloomy situation with astonishment. though, some measures have now been taken by the state government and also the central government by way of amending the wild life (protection) act, 1972 in the year 2006. various authorities, committees, foundations and forums have been established, however, when they will effectively enforce the law, it is a big question to be answered .....

Forest Friendly Camps Private Ltd., Sherpur Vs. State of Rajasthan and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2002Raj214; 2001(2)WLC119

..... the tourist has to enter the sanctuary in the vehicle provided by the forest officials. 7. the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (hereinafter shall be referred to as 'the act of 1972') has been enacted to provide for the protection of wild animals, birds and plants and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto'. the ..... hotels and resorts around the park area. consequently, many hotels and resorts have been set up nearby the park area. 2. the government of rajasthan under the wild life (protection) (rajasthan) rules, 1977 (for short, 'the rules of 1977') introduced 'roster system' for regulating tourism business by controlling vehicular entry of private vehicles. ..... protection of wild animals, birds and plants. section 27 of the act of 1972 provides for restriction on entry in sanctuary but the restriction is not absolute and is subject to the provisions of section 28 of the act which provides for grant of permit. under section 28 of the act of 1972 the chief wild life .....

Gaj Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1104

..... called mr. bharat vyas, learned additional advocate general, mr. k.k. sharma, learned assistant solicitor general, mr. dinesh yadav and mr. m.s. kachhawaha and heard their submissions.4. (the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (for short '1972 act') was enacted for the protection of wild animals, birds and plants and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto. section 28 of 1972 ..... be issued subject to such conditions and on payment of such fee as may be prescribed.5. section 64 of 1972 act relates to power of state government to make rules. pursuant to section 64 of 1972 act, the state government made wild life (protection) (rajasthan) rules, 1977 (for short '1977 rules'), which came to be published in rajasthan. gazette on july 7, 1977. having .....