Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 17 restrictions on hunting repealed Page 5 of about 3,288 results (0.346 seconds)

P.V. S/O M.V.Vargice, Vs. the State of KarnatakA. by S.H.O.. Uppinanga ...

Court : Karnataka

..... six accused persons against whom a case is registered in respect of the offences under sections 2. 9, 39. 48a. 50 and 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and under sections 3(1). 25 & 27 of the arms act, 1959 r/w section 34 of the i.p.c. and the prosecution case, in short, is that, when the complainant was patrolling on ..... checked a qualis vehicle which was coming from gundy side and found that there were four persons in the vehicle along with five plastic bags containing 5 k.gs. of wild animal flesh half baked and recovered from them a country single barrel gun and live cartridges.3. following the arrest of the said four persons, a case was registered even .....

Salman S/O Dr.Syed Javeed Ahmed, Vs. State by Rfo K.Gudi Police, Chama ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 2, 2(i)ii), 2(14}, 2(15), 2(16), 2(26), 2(36), 2(39), 9, 19, 27. 31, 39, 39(d), 50. 51, 57 and 24(c) of wild life (protection) act.2. the prosecution allegation in short is that, this petitioner and other accused shot a deer and on the basis of the voluntary statement said to have been made by .....

Ravi and anr.Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... of vandanpathal forest station, erumely range for offences punishable under sections 2(2), 2(16), 2(32), 2(36), 2(37), 9, 39, 40, 50, 51 and 49 of the wild life protection act, 1972, seek anticipatory bail. 2. the learned public prosecutor opposed the application.3. anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. but at the same time, i .....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Capt. C.P. Krishna Nair and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR286; (1999)1BOMLR873

..... order of magistrate, 22nd court, andheri, mumbai g.v. wadekar dated 3-7-1996 discharging all the respondents from their prosecution under the provisions of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (in short 'the act').3. it was contended by the learned a.p.p. for the appellant that finding of the magistrate that the complaint was barred by limitation was wrong ..... because the bird peafowl (pavo cristatus) at sr. no. 11 in part iii of schedule i was a protected bird which was found in possession of the accused ..... that accused no. 1 was the chairman, accused no. 2 was the managing director and the accused no. 3 was the person with whom different officers under the act have entered into correspondence in respect of the offences. these three are therefore directly concerned in the day to day working of the accused no. 1 and therefore .....

Lal Ranjan Nath Shahdeo Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2414

..... prosecution.2. the petitioner case in brief is that a case has been registered under section 25(1-b), 26, 35 of the arms act, sections 4/5 of the explosive substance act and section 4 of the wild life protection act against the petitioner and others i.e. chandwa p.s. case no. 38 of 2000. after submission of the charge sheet, the case was ..... the impugned order, it appears that in the instant case, the charge has been framed under section 25(1-b), 26/35 arms act, 4/5 explosive substance act and section 11 of prevention of cruelty to animal act. it also appears from the record that in the course of argument the defence has put reliance on the expert report available on the .....

Ramesh Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT794

..... . the offences alleged against the accused are under sections 2, 9, 39, 42, 44, 49, 49b, 50, 51 and 57 of the wild life protection act.3. the prosecution case is the following: on getting intelligence information that a leopard skin was being transported in the jeep bearing registration number kl-02 ..... on article 51(g) of the constitution of india. an apparently innocuous act of protecting agricultural crops by trapping wild animals, may amount to an offence under the wild life protection act. punishing a man for such an offence may seem to be harsh. if the villagers and agriculturists are ..... to educate the villagers and persons residing near the forest areas, about the importance of protecting wild life. they should also be educated as to how their seemingly innocent acts would probably amount to an offence under the wild life protection act. the villagers and agriculturists should be made aware of their fundamental duties, with particular emphasis .....

M/S Natesan Agencies (Plantations) Vs. State Rep. By the Secretary to ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... a notification dated 06.03.1976, as issued by the government of tamil nadu, the land in question was proposed to be included in a wild life sanctuary under the wild life (protection) act, 19723 and several propositions for award of compensation were actively considered by the authorities concerned, who were also under the mandate of the high court ..... follows the directions of the government. since the notification and declaration was issued by the state government under section 18 of the unamended wild life protection act, it is the government and the government alone which can cancel or modify the notification by invoking the power under section 21 of the general clauses ..... on 14.07.1977, the district collector issued a proclamation under section 21 of the act of 1972 specifying the limits of the sanctuary and requiring any person having any right to file the claim in form no.8 under the wild life protection (tamil nadu) rules, 19754. the appellant would submit that the land in question was .....

K. Ekambaram Reddy S/O K. Doraswamy Reddy Vs. Deputy Conservator of Fo ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3197; 2007(5)KarLJ112; 2007(4)AIRKarR81

..... section 2 r/w section 3 of the forest (conservation) act, 1980. it is further contended that the aforesaid case ..... karnataka forest act, 1963 (for short 'forest act') and karnataka forest rules, 1969 (for short 'forest rules') and section 8 r/w section 22 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 (for short 'trees act') and under section 2(16) and section 9 r/w section 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (for short 'wild life act') and ..... land area of the bangalore palace ground, in violation of various provisions of the forest act, trees act, wild life act and other acts. several species of trees including sandalwood trees have been uprooted and buried inside the heap of soil. the wild birds habitat has also been destroyed. it is submitted that the vehicle in question .....

G.R. Simon Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi301; 1997(41)DRJ604; (1997)117PLR66

..... made of skin, hereinafter referred to as the 'animal articles'. (2) the petitioners in the above writ petitions had challenged the introduction of provisions of chapter va in the wild life (protection) act, 1972 by wild life (protection) amendment act 1986, together with notification issued there under as being vocative of article 19(1)(g) read with articles 300 and 300a of the constitution of india. (3) we ..... to civil writ petition no.2750 of 1986 and civil writ petition no-3586 of 1987. (16) apart from challenging the constitutional validity of 1986 amendment and provisions of the wild life protection act, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners should be permitted to dispose of their existing stocks which have been duly declared and identified by the respondents. learned counsel .....

Shyam Sunder Sharma Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 70(1997)DLT401

..... was passed in the following terms : 'we have seen the hindi version of the notification published on 30th september, 1991 and found that chapter v-a of the wild life (protection) act, 1972, as amended up to 2nd october, 1991, came into force with effect from 2nd october, 1991 and the business in imported ivory can be carried only till ..... a free trade. in 1986, the trade in ivory imported into india was brought under the provisions of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (in short referred to as 'the act') and in accordance with. the provisions of section 44 of the act, no person could carry on or commence business in articles made of ivory imported into india unless a license ..... earlier notification so as to read accept sections 13,22,26 30(ii) and 39 insofar as its provisions relate to clause c of new section 55 substituted in wild life (protection) amendment act, 1972 (53) 1972' in place of the words 'except sections 33a, 44(ii)(o), 55c, chapter iiia and chapter va'. the effect of the issue .....