Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: warehousing development and regulation act 2007 section 46 chairperson member officers and other employees of authority tobe public servants Court: punjab and haryana

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. M/S. Atma Tube Products Ltd. a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... act 91. coastal aquaculture authority act 92. credit information companies (regulation) act 93. disaster management act 94. government securities act 95. the petroleum and natural gas regulatory board act 96. payment and settlement systems act 97. warehousing (development and regulation) act 98. airports economic regulatory authority of india act 99. ..... (public libraries) act 27. essential commodities act 28. companies act 29. newspaper (price and page) act 30. securities contracts (regulation) act 31. mines and minerals (development and regulation) act 32. delhi rent control act 33. children act 34. geneva conventions act 35. apprentices act 36. deposit insurance and credit ..... guarantee corporation act 37. motor transport workers act 38. customs act 39. the warehousing corporations act 40. the unit trust of .....

Chandigarh Administration and Another Vs. Mrs. Neera Goyal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . vs. union territory of chandigarh, 2008(3) rcr (civil) 4 42. his next contention was that, as per section 22 of the capital of punjab (development & regulation) act, 1952, a notification would have to be issued again if the fee is changed and, as such, the order dated 14.07.2008 could not supplant or ..... context otherwise requires- all words and expressions used in the scheme but not defined hereunder shall have the meaning attached thereto in the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act 1952 and the rules made thereunder. (i) industrial site . means site allotted/sold/leased out by the chandigarh administration for whatever purposes in ..... industrial sites into commercial activity / services in industrial area, phase-i and ii, chandigarh scheme 2005 . and was promulgated under the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952.5. the relevant clauses of the scheme are reproduced hereunder:- finance department notification the19h september, 2005 no.28/8/51-utfi(3)-2005/ .....

Jagir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1994]80CompCas30(P& H)

..... textile undertaking, specified in the first schedule, the management of which has, before the appointed day, been taken over by the central government under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, or as the case may be, vested in the central government under the sick textile undertakings (taking over of management) act, 1972 ..... textile undertaking, specified in the first schedule, the management of which has, before the appointed day, been taken over by the central government under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, or, as the case may be, vested in the central government under the sick textile undertakings (taking over of management) act, 1972 ..... of this reason that the mills remained closed, which was beyond the control of the management.5. under section 15 of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, there is a power to cause investigation to be made by the central government into the scheduled industries or industrial undertakings regarding .....

Nirmal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)133PLR110

..... of fact the appellants have lost in both the courts below. they had earlier lost in revision filed by them under section 11(4) of the punjab urban estates (development and regulation) act, 1964 against the order of chief administrator dated 4.6.90. in my opinion, plot/scf no. 88 was justifiably resumed by the estate officer. the ..... 2.4.1986 did not find any weight in his submission and ordered the resumption of the plot/scf no. 88 under section 10 of the punjab urban estates (development and regulation) act, 1964. he ordered the forfeiture of the amount equal to 10% of the consideration money.13. in their appeal to the chief administrator, the chief ..... 3. whether the suit is not maintainable in the present form? opd 4. whether the suit of the plaintiff is barred under section 20 of the punjab urban estates (development and regulation) act, 1964? opd 5. relief. 4. additional senior sub judge, kharar vide order dated 5.9.1994 dismissed the plaintiffs suit in view of his findings that plaintiffs .....

Surinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)117PLR261

..... inter se.(ix) the state has no jurisdiction to charge additional price in view of the provisions of sections 3 and of the punjab urban estate development and regulation act, 1964 (hereinafter) referred to as '1964 act') and the punjab urban estate (sale of sites) rules, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as ..... '1965 rules'). similarly, under the punjab housing development board act, 1972 and the punjab housing development board (preparation and approval development plan) rules, 1975, the subsequent vendees who have ..... land by adding 50% of acquisition charges, 2% administrative charges, interest payable on the compensation paid to the land owners, area to be developed, cost of development, administrative and supervisor charges for (he bank guarantee, government charges, profits etc. there was no provision for re-fixing the tentative price, much .....

Gulmohar Estates Limited and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)116PLR547

..... residents welfare association, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a mandamus directing respondent no. 2 to comply with the provisions of section 8 of the haryana development and regulation of urban areas act, 1975 and the provisions of the haryana apartments ownership act, 1983 as well as article 3 of the agreement entered into between ..... haryana took cognizance of the judgment of this court in c.w.p. nos. 2419 and 3624 of 1973 whereby the provisions of the haryana restriction on (development and regulation of colonies) act, 1971 were declared unconstitutional. the government took notice of the observations made by the high court and decided to bring about a legislation ..... of section 9 are contravened the punishment of imprisonment shall not exceed six months.'15. we may also refer to some of the provisions of the haryana development and regulation of urban areas rules, 1976 which have been made by the governor of haryana in exercise of powers under section 24 of '1975 act'. rule 2 .....

Present: Mr.Balraj Singh Malik Advocate Vs. Malik Industry and Another ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , 1963 and such construction is not compoundable.3. that there is violation of section 7(i) of the haryana development and regulation of urban areas act, 1975.4. it is not feasible for haryana urban development authority to adjust the land without affecting the approved layout plan of sector 29 panipat because the said land affects 4 plots ..... discussion. a reading of the policy would show that it pertains to the cases which had been admitted and only where stay had been granted which handicaps the developing agencies to provide linkages and services. merely approaching this court would not amount to automatic release as professed by the counsel for the petitioners. thus, the issue ..... the letter dated 28.02.2006 from the estate officer, huda, panipat goes on to show that a boundary wall coming in the roads had been dismantled and development works on these roads by the executive engineer, huda division, panipat had been completed. however, in view of the decision dated 10.01.2006 of the hon .....

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. in the High Court of Pu ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... to it. by referring to rule 9 of the chandigarh (sale of sites and buildings) rules, 1960 (for short, the rules) framed under section 22 of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952 (for short, the act) and schedule-i, appended to the rules, the learned senior counsel representing the petitioner, has argued that sale and charging of batteries is .....

Sat Pal Verma Vs. Smt. Paramjit Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)115PLR732

..... ground that the defendant had 'started using the premises for running an academy/school/college.....' which was not permissible under the rules and the provisions of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952, and the rules made thereunder. it was specifically pleaded that the premises had been let out for the purpose of residence. the defendant had filed a written .....

Cwp No.21899 of 2012 (O and M) Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... management cell constituted under the punjab mining minerals rules, 2013 and the sailesh ranjan 2013.08.30 16:27 i attest to the accuracy and minerals development and regulation act, 1957. integrity of this document cwp no.21899 of 2012 (o & m) -4- counsel for state of punjab submits that requisite notification ..... counsel for the pollution control board, to order that a meeting of the principal secretaries, department of industries, science, technology and environment, department of housing and development, the director, town and country planning, the chairman, pollution control board and the principal secretary, irrigation department, be convened, to reconsider the citing parameters ..... by these stone crushing units from the concerned department. the state of punjab is directed to file an affidavit placing on record relevant rules and regulations that permit installation of stone crushers in river bed/choes or in their catchment areas. . concern was shown by this court that such like .....