Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: warehousing development and regulation act 2007 section 4 registration of warehouses Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 11 results (0.063 seconds)

Mar 18 2013 (HC)

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. M/S. Atma Tube Products Ltd. a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... act 91. coastal aquaculture authority act 92. credit information companies (regulation) act 93. disaster management act 94. government securities act 95. the petroleum and natural gas regulatory board act 96. payment and settlement systems act 97. warehousing (development and regulation) act 98. airports economic regulatory authority of india act 99. ..... (public libraries) act 27. essential commodities act 28. companies act 29. newspaper (price and page) act 30. securities contracts (regulation) act 31. mines and minerals (development and regulation) act 32. delhi rent control act 33. children act 34. geneva conventions act 35. apprentices act 36. deposit insurance and credit ..... guarantee corporation act 37. motor transport workers act 38. customs act 39. the warehousing corporations act 40. the unit trust of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2014 (HC)

Chandigarh Administration and Another Vs. Mrs. Neera Goyal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . vs. union territory of chandigarh, 2008(3) rcr (civil) 4 42. his next contention was that, as per section 22 of the capital of punjab (development & regulation) act, 1952, a notification would have to be issued again if the fee is changed and, as such, the order dated 14.07.2008 could not supplant or ..... context otherwise requires- all words and expressions used in the scheme but not defined hereunder shall have the meaning attached thereto in the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act 1952 and the rules made thereunder. (i) industrial site . means site allotted/sold/leased out by the chandigarh administration for whatever purposes in ..... industrial sites into commercial activity / services in industrial area, phase-i and ii, chandigarh scheme 2005 . and was promulgated under the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952.5. the relevant clauses of the scheme are reproduced hereunder:- finance department notification the19h september, 2005 no.28/8/51-utfi(3)-2005/ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 1991 (HC)

Jagir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1994]80CompCas30(P& H)

..... textile undertaking, specified in the first schedule, the management of which has, before the appointed day, been taken over by the central government under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, or as the case may be, vested in the central government under the sick textile undertakings (taking over of management) act, 1972 ..... textile undertaking, specified in the first schedule, the management of which has, before the appointed day, been taken over by the central government under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, or, as the case may be, vested in the central government under the sick textile undertakings (taking over of management) act, 1972 ..... of this reason that the mills remained closed, which was beyond the control of the management.5. under section 15 of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, there is a power to cause investigation to be made by the central government into the scheduled industries or industrial undertakings regarding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 2001 (HC)

Nirmal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)133PLR110

..... of fact the appellants have lost in both the courts below. they had earlier lost in revision filed by them under section 11(4) of the punjab urban estates (development and regulation) act, 1964 against the order of chief administrator dated 4.6.90. in my opinion, plot/scf no. 88 was justifiably resumed by the estate officer. the ..... 2.4.1986 did not find any weight in his submission and ordered the resumption of the plot/scf no. 88 under section 10 of the punjab urban estates (development and regulation) act, 1964. he ordered the forfeiture of the amount equal to 10% of the consideration money.13. in their appeal to the chief administrator, the chief ..... 3. whether the suit is not maintainable in the present form? opd 4. whether the suit of the plaintiff is barred under section 20 of the punjab urban estates (development and regulation) act, 1964? opd 5. relief. 4. additional senior sub judge, kharar vide order dated 5.9.1994 dismissed the plaintiffs suit in view of his findings that plaintiffs .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 1997 (HC)

Surinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)117PLR261

..... inter se.(ix) the state has no jurisdiction to charge additional price in view of the provisions of sections 3 and of the punjab urban estate development and regulation act, 1964 (hereinafter) referred to as '1964 act') and the punjab urban estate (sale of sites) rules, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as ..... '1965 rules'). similarly, under the punjab housing development board act, 1972 and the punjab housing development board (preparation and approval development plan) rules, 1975, the subsequent vendees who have ..... land by adding 50% of acquisition charges, 2% administrative charges, interest payable on the compensation paid to the land owners, area to be developed, cost of development, administrative and supervisor charges for (he bank guarantee, government charges, profits etc. there was no provision for re-fixing the tentative price, much .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2013 (HC)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. in the High Court of Pu ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... to it. by referring to rule 9 of the chandigarh (sale of sites and buildings) rules, 1960 (for short, the rules) framed under section 22 of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952 (for short, the act) and schedule-i, appended to the rules, the learned senior counsel representing the petitioner, has argued that sale and charging of batteries is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 1997 (HC)

Sat Pal Verma Vs. Smt. Paramjit Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)115PLR732

..... ground that the defendant had 'started using the premises for running an academy/school/college.....' which was not permissible under the rules and the provisions of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952, and the rules made thereunder. it was specifically pleaded that the premises had been let out for the purpose of residence. the defendant had filed a written .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2013 (HC)

Cwp No.21899 of 2012 (O and M) Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... management cell constituted under the punjab mining minerals rules, 2013 and the sailesh ranjan 2013.08.30 16:27 i attest to the accuracy and minerals development and regulation act, 1957. integrity of this document cwp no.21899 of 2012 (o & m) -4- counsel for state of punjab submits that requisite notification ..... counsel for the pollution control board, to order that a meeting of the principal secretaries, department of industries, science, technology and environment, department of housing and development, the director, town and country planning, the chairman, pollution control board and the principal secretary, irrigation department, be convened, to reconsider the citing parameters ..... by these stone crushing units from the concerned department. the state of punjab is directed to file an affidavit placing on record relevant rules and regulations that permit installation of stone crushers in river bed/choes or in their catchment areas. . concern was shown by this court that such like .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 1972 (HC)

V.K. JaIn Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1974P& H21

..... , where the chakki installed by the petitioners is functioning. respondent no. 2 was not, therefore, a person aggrieved within the meaning of section 10(2) of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952, and could not agitate the matter in appeal before the chief administrator.'3. against the decision of the chief commissioner, v. k. jain filed the writ petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1993 (HC)

Union of India and Others Vs. Jagir Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1993P& H223; [1994]80CompCas47(P& H); (1993)104PLR134

..... stopped working completely in 1969. in the very next year, that is, on 17th december, 1970, an inquiry was ordered by the central government under section 15 of the industries (development' and regulation) act, 1951. the report of the investigating committee was submitted to the central government on 8th november, 1971, and it was thereafter on 31st october, 1972, that management of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //