Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: warehousing development and regulation act 2007 section 4 registration of warehouses Court: kerala Page 1 of about 20 results (0.064 seconds)

Mar 14 1996 (HC)

Sunny Markose Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1996Ker379

..... of the state falling under entry 8 of list ii of the 7th schedule of the constitution. they are not repugnant to the central enactment, the industries (development) and regulation) act 45 of 1951, falling within entry 52 of list i of the 7th schedule; nor has the centre, in any case, occupied the field in ..... appellant, enforcement of ext. p2 order will entrench upon the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 (act 65 of 1951). the industries development and regulation) act, 1951 is enacted under entry 52, list 1 of with schedule. section 2 of the act declares that it is expedient in ..... v. v. state of tamil nadu, 1988 writ lr 427.point no. 3 8. third point raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is that the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 (act 65 of 1951) occupies the field as the central legislation falls within entry 52, list 1 of viith schedule. according to learned counsel for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 1985 (HC)

P.V. Mani and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1986Ker86

..... 25. counsel for the respondents submits that in view of clause (b) of the proviso to section 9a of the i. d. act, the development officers who are govern'ed by the staff regulations issued under section 49 of the lic act are taken out of the purview of the section. we cannot accept this submission, for, we understand ..... of the i.d. act. it is urged that the agreements of 1964, 1965 and 1971 supplemented the blue order and the staff regulations of 1960 and they formed the service conditions of development officers. the respondents contend that the agreements were not industrial awards or settlementsenforceable under section 18 or section 19 of the i.d. act ..... minimum volume of business. however, the very short question to be decided is as to whether conditions of service of development officers obtaining immediately prior to the issue of orders under section 11(2) and the regulations under section 49 of the act in 1976 and then in 1978 were altered to their prejudice without notice as provided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 1983 (HC)

Mrs. Elizabeth Samuel Aaron Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1983Ker225

..... because it produces purified clay should, therefore, be rejected.16. if that be the position, the prohibition contained in section 20 of the industries (development and regulation) act does not apply; and there is no interdict against the state even taking over the control or management of the company in question. the decision ..... :'these provisions were evidently intended to control the scheduled industries and if the sugar industry was one of the scheduled industries the control thereof involved the development and regulation of the sugar industry and the registration and the licensing as also investigation into the affairs of the undertakings which were engaged in the production or ..... 3 (1) thereof.6. it is necessary to refer to entry 52 list i of the viith schedule of the constitution of india, the industries (development and regulation) act, 65 of 1951, the provisions of the relief undertakings act and the rules made thereunder for a proper understanding of these submissions.'entry 52 : .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2002 (HC)

All Kerala Chartered Accountants Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2002)176CTR(Ker)268; [2002]258ITR679(Ker)

..... job-description, job evaluation and evaluation of work loads. (xviii) systems analysis and design, and computer related services including selection of hardware and development of software in all areas of services which can otherwise be rendered by a chartered accountant in practice and also to carry out any other professional ..... has to be allowed to the legislature. the court should feel more inclined to give judicial deference to legislative judgment in the field of economic regulation than in other areas where fundamental human rights are involved..... the court must always remember that 'legislation is directedto practical problems, that the economic ..... practical differences and concentrate on some abstract identities is lifeless logic'.and concluded (scc p. 678, para 67)'in the utilities, tax and economic regulation cases, there are good reasons for judicial self-restraint, if not judicial deference to legislative judgment. the legislature after all has the affirmative responsibility. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 1985 (HC)

immanuel Paul Chakkola Vs. Catholic Syrian Bank and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1988]64CompCas399(Ker); [1986(52)FLR5]; (1987)IILLJ198Ker

..... and chemicals travancore ltd. [1984] klt 32, united electrical industries--secretary, meters staff association v. united electrical industries ltd. [1984] klt888, the kerala state industrial development and employment corporation ltd.--kunju mohammed v. state of kerala, [1984] klt 403 (fb) and other institutions (a co-operative society--sherthallai urban co-op. ..... virtually have a monopoly character. the reserve bank and various governmental agencies give massive aid in relation to their functioning. (the provisions of the banking regulation act, 1949, as amended from time to time, were referred to while elaborating the aspect of deep and pervasive governmental control over the banks). ..... the background in which very tight control is exercised over the bank. the state is necessarily obliged to evince such deep interest in controlling and regulating the activities of a bank, inasmuch as the public are vitally interested in its security and stability. the larger the involvement of the public, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2016 (HC)

State of Kerala, represented by Chief Secretary and Another Vs. Kerala ...

Court : Kerala

..... you that government has not laid down any policy to raise the retirement age. hence the request to raise retirement age of employees in kerala land development corporation cannot be considered keeping in view of the present state of affairs in the corporation, which is being run on loss.yours faithfully,sd/-deputy ..... to approve the said resolution and sent communication dated 09.04.2003 which is to the following effect: from the agricultural production commissioner. to the managing director, kerala land development corporation, thycaud, thiruvananthapuram. sir, sub:- kldc - raising the retirement age of employees - reg. ref:-1) memorandum dated 30.10.2001 submitted to the honourable ..... since the warehousing corporation was in profit. the said factor is not available in the present case. 21. another judgment on which reliance has been placed is state of u.p. v. dayanand chakrawarty ([2013] 7 scc 595). in the above case, the apex court had occasion to consider regulations 3 and 4 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1975 (HC)

Sankaran Vs. Dy. Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1977)IILLJ171Ker

..... and warehousing) corporation act, 1956. the court was of the view that the violation of the regulation concerned would not amount to breach ..... : (1971)illj496sc , the supreme court considered the question whether an employee of the indian airlines corporation dismissed in contravention of the regulations made under the air corporation act, 1953 can get a declaration from the civil court that the dismissal is null void. thereafter ..... warehousing corporation dismissing him from service is null and void and he is entitled to reinstatement, the supreme court observed that the exceptions referred to in justice shah's judgment will not be attracted even in a case where the dismissal is in violation of a regulation made under the power reserved to the warehousing corporation under section 54 of the agricultural produce (development .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 1971 (HC)

A. Davood Khan and anr. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1972)IILLJ110Ker

..... the respondent who was an employee of the warehouse corporation1 was dismissed from service for misconduct after an enquiry as required by the regulations made by the corporation under the agricultural produce (development and warehousing) corporations act, 1956. the respondent filed a suit for a declaration that his dismissal was illegal, and for other reliefs. ..... his contention that the petitioners are not entitled to relief under article 226 of the constitution for violation of the regulations, counsel referred me to the decision of the supreme court in u.p. state warehousing corporation v. chandra kiran tyagi 1970-i l.l.j. 32 : a.f.r. 1970 s.c. 1244 ..... the trial court held that the dismissal was bad under law, as if the enquiry conducted against the respondent did not comply with regulation no. 16. that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

Financial Servic Executives Welfare Association Vs. Life Insurance Cor ...

Court : Kerala

..... the learned standing counsel for the respondent corporation.29. relying on ext.p14 which is the copy of the insurance regulatory and development authority (licensing of corporate agent) amendment regulation, 2010, it was argued by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the respondent corporation is not insisting enforcement of ..... this position is well settled through the decisions of the apex court in s.r.tewari v the district board agra (air1964sc1680, u.p. state warehousing corporation v c.k.tyagi (air1970sc1244, indian airlines corporation v sukhdeo rai (air1971sc1828, executive committee of vaish degree college, shamli and others v lakshmi ..... senior divisional manager. p25- true copy of memorandum dated66.2014 by1t petitioner before the chairman. p26- true copy of notification dated1610.2002 (insurance regulatory and development authority( licensing of corporate agents) regulations2002. p27- true copy of counter affidavit dated112.2014 in w.p[c] no.4211/2013 filed before the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 06 2006 (HC)

Cepz Workers Union Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(1)KLJ39

..... country for very definite purposes. this zone is a central government installation, which is customs bounded, wherein, property worth crores of rupees are being brought in and warehoused. the development commissioner is directly in-charge of the security of the area as well as the goods, which are brought into the special economic zone. therefore, it is ..... the primary contention of the petitioner is that section 12 of the act does not confer any power on the development commissioner to issue a circular like ext. p1. according to him, his power to regulate issue of identity cards is regulated by rule 70. no where in the act or rules is there any power conferred on the ..... rule 70 of the rules reads thus:70. identity cards - (1) the entry of persons to the processing area of the special economic zone shall be regulated by the development commissioner through issue of identity cards.(2) the identity card shall be valid upto a period of five years and shall be issued, in the format given .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //