Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: warehousing development and regulation act 2007 section 4 registration of warehouses Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 20 results (0.061 seconds)

May 03 1957 (HC)

E. Sefton and Co., Mirzapur Vs. Textile Mill Mazdoor Union and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1958All80

..... made of wool. consequently, the industry of the petitioner company is an industry which is covered by the declaration contained in section 2 of the industries development regulation act, 1951 as amended by the amendment act of 1953. under clause (ee) of section 2 of the central industrial disputes act, a controlled ..... mentioned in that schedule. but a single undertaking of that nature would not be synonymous with that industry. sections 10 and 11 of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, required the registration or licensing of an industrial undertaking engaged in any industry and not the registration or licensing of the industry as ..... of section 2 of the central industrial disputes act. the controlled industries mentioned in that notification are not covered by the first schedule to the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 as amended in 1953. the controlled industries mentioned in that notification came within the purview of section 2 of the atomic energy act, .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 1996 (HC)

M/S. Tiveni Engineering Works Ltd. and Another Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All420

..... operation, then, priority will be given to the application received earlier. the petitioner had made an application to [he authorities under section 11 of the industrial development regulations act for gram of licence at hussainpur on 7-7-1993 and, till such tune, there were no other applicant for the site at hussainpur and, ..... in reserved and assigned areas.8. so far as the establishment of sugar factories is concerned, it is controlled by the central government under the industrial development and regulation act, 1951. under section 3(i) of this act, a schedule industry means any of to industries specified in the 1st schedule. in the said ..... a decision on the part of the government to grant industrial licence under the industrial (development and regulation) act, 1951, for the establishment of expansion of sugar factories in areas of assured sugurcane availability with potential for further development of sugarcane. it indicates that the guidelines spoken of were broad ones and the basic .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2008 (HC)

Zunaid Ahmad Son of Late Abdul Aziz Vs. the State of U.P. Through the ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3616

..... lease deed is in consonance with the principles laid down in the minerva mills case (supra).14. under section 4a(2) of the mines & mineral (development and regulation) act, 1957, the state government can prematurely terminate the lease in the circumstances specified in that section and 'for such other purposes as the state government may ..... of india while rule 41 of the u.p. minor minerals (concession) rules, 1963 as well as section 4a(2) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 are facets of the reasonable restrictions contemplated in clause (6) of article 19 of the constitution of india as also the directive principles pertaining to ..... purpose of winning any mineral on terms and conditions different from those laid down in these rules.sub-section 2 of section 4a of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 is also relevant and is being quoted below:4a. termination of prospecting licences or mining leases - (1) ...(2) where the state government, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1991 (HC)

M/S. Jhunjhunwala Vanaspati Ltd. Vs. Bureau of Indian Standards and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1991All259

..... counter-affidavit reliance has been placed on the two notifications dt. 16th feb., 1973 and 30th june, 1988, under s. 29-b of the aforesaid industries (development & regulation) act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the 1dr act of 1951) to contend that exemptions from the licensing provisions of the said idr act of 1951 ..... order setting asidethe impugned order cancelling provisional registration is unassailable. however, the further order granting relief to the effect that the provisions of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 are not attracted cannot be allowed to stand firstly because it was not necessary to go into that question when the impugned order was ..... the grant of licence to use the standard marks on the ground that the petitioner does not possess any industrial licence under the provisions of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, for the manufacture of vanaspati ghee. it is in the light of this ultimately an order was passed on llth may, 1990 ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 24 1968 (HC)

imperial Electric Trading Co., Aligarh Vs. Industrial Tribunal (ii), U ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1969All242; [1968(17)FLR420]

..... be absurd to say that the manufacture and sale of aluminium-ware is the same as the manufacture of aeroplanes and aeronautical parts.6. under section 2 of the industrial (development and regulation) act, 1951, the union government is authorised to take under its control the industries specified in the first schedule of the said act. a clear distinction is made in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1975 (HC)

Janki Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1976All99

..... parliament act no. 72 of 1971. the act itself had come into force on the 8th may 1952. the act was passed to provide for the development and regulation of certain industries. section 15 of the act invests power on the central government to cause investigation to be made into scheduled industries or industrial undertakings. if ..... agarwal, j.1. on 15-1-1973, the government of india published a notified order, in exercise of the powers by section 18-aa of industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, hereinafter referred to as the act, authorising the uttar pradesh state sugar corporation limited, to take over the management of the shree sugar mills and ..... it has been used in a different sense.14. it may be useful here to refer to the speech of the minister of industrial development made in the raiya sabha moving the industrial (development and regulation) amendment bill, 1971. this speech gives a certain reason for the proposed amendment. the question whether a speech, made by a minister .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2007 (HC)

B. Agarwal Stone Product Limited Through Its Managing Director, Birsh ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC3470

..... by any limitations imposable and permissible. a tax or fee levied by stale with the object of augmenting its finances and in reasonable limits does not ipso facto trench upon regulation, development or control of the subject. it is different if the tax or fee sought to be levied by state can itself be called regulatory, the primary purpose whereof is ..... the states' power to legislate. power to tax mineral rights is with the states; the power to lay down limitations on exercise of such power, in the interest of regulation, development or control, as the case may be, is with the union. this is the result achieved by homogeneous reading of entry 50 in list ii and entries 52-and 54 ..... be levied by the union. power to tax mineral rights is with the states but the power to lay down limitations on exercise of such power, in the interest of regulation, development or control, is with the union. this is the result of homogeneous reading of entry 50 in list ii and entries 52. and 54 in list i. so long .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1977 (HC)

Suresh Chandra and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1977All515

..... the chief justice that by exempting from the operation of clause 2 which is the crucial provision of the order, dairies registered under the industries (development and regulation) act and also the dairies run by co-operative societies, the government and government corporations, the milk control order has resulted in discrimination and ..... is also competent to enact law for controlling production, supply and distribution and the prices of the products of the industries registered under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, and also of foodstuffs.58. the impugned act comes within the ambit of entry 33 in list iii of the vii schedule ..... hindustan lever at etah, dalpatpur factory at moradabad, foremost dairy industry at saharanpur and indiana dairy industry at muzaffarnagar which are registered under the industries development and regulations act 1951. thus the order is discriminatory and violative of article 14 of the constitution of india. 30. that the four objects sought to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 1962 (HC)

J.A. Dixit Vs. Official Liquidator

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1963All284

..... singh made the appointment of dixit as general manager in the interregnum following the removal of the controller, who had been appointed under the industries development regulation act, and the appointment of sri mangtu rim jaipuria under the essential supplies (temporary powers) act, in an endeavour, if nothing else, to ..... affairs of the mills. these disputes appear to have brought about the misfortunes of the milts which subsequently led to government taking action under the industrial development regulation act and thereafter under the essential supplies (temporary powers) act, 1946, by appointing sri mangtu earn jaipuria as an authorised controller.10. the ..... yielded any spectacular results.3. on the roth november, 1953, a 'controller' appears to have been appointed by the central government under the industries development regulation act of 1951. on the 21st may, 1954, however, the central government cancelled the aforementioned appointment- with the result that the management of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2006 (HC)

Anil Kumar Rastogi Son of Sri Hari Ram Rastogi, Shyam Sunder Mill Vs. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1936

..... to compel it to perform such a statutory function.14. after considering the provisions of the reserve bank of india act, 1934, the banking regulation act, 1949, and the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, the court observed as under:-in view of the provisions indicated above under the companies act and the industries ..... agreement for hire purchase is arbitrary and unreasonable and provides a very high rate of interest and the seizure of the vehicle is in contravention of the banking regulation act, 1949. the notices impugned provide for recovery of interest at the rate of 62.02% per day which is too exorbitant. hence, the court ..... (development and regulation) act, it is submitted that the nature and control over the companies is more or less of the same degree and nature as the control exercised over the banking companies under the banking regulation act. there is control and supervision over the functioning, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //