Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1957Raj213
..... the regulation of mines and mineral development is separately provided by serials nos. 54 and 55 of the union list and serial no. 23 of the states list subject to the provisions of list i ..... not a mineral. learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn our attention to the circumstance that the manufacture, distribution and supply of salt by the union agencies as well as regulation and control of the manufacture supply and distribution thereof by other agencies is a union subject and has been provided for in serial no. 58 of the union list; whereas .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1958Raj140
..... provisions of law, we have no hesitation in holding that under the rules framed under the mines and minerals act, the central government is concerned with the regulation and development of such minerals only as may be declared by it to be within its authority in the public interest, and under the rules made under the act, ..... and void because the rajasthan government has no authority to make these rules, and it is only the central government that can make them under the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act (no. liii) of 1948 (hereinafter called the mines and minerals act), and in any case, schedule no. i which prescribes the various rates of ..... attention in this connection to serial no. 54 of list i (union list) of the constitution which is worded like this:'regulation of names and mineral development to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of the union is declared by parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest.'then there is item .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1961Raj130
..... to consider the probable period from which the nationalised bus services could be expected to operate. this aspect has acquired further importance in view of the subsequent developments that have taken place. the rules, that were framed in connection with the scheme for routes excepting jaipur bharatpur route have been declared by this court ..... basic and fundamental considerations governing the administration of the provisions of the motor vehicles act. the object of the motor vehicles act is to secure a proper regulation and co-ordination of the traffic services and the main consideration is the public interests.before the amendment act of 1956, there were no provisions for ..... that they will not secure a fair and objective determination of their appeals.it will be useful to quote the observations of the supreme court in mineral development ltd. v. state of bihar, air 1960 sc 468 dealing with the principles governing the doctrine of bias vis-a-vis judicial tribunals and their applicability .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1972WLN553
..... v. chandra kant tyagi air 1970 sc 244 where their lordships of the supreme court have taken the view that the regulations made under section 54 of the agriculture produce (development and warehousing) corporations act, 1956, do not impose any statutory obligation even though they lay down the terms and conditions of the ..... tyagi air 1970 sc 244, to which reference has been made already. the petitioner there was an employee of the up warehousing corporation, which was constituted under the agricultural produce (development and warehousing) corporations act, 1966. their lordships of the supreme court examined the question as to when and under what circumstances a ..... .24. as has been stated, their lordships of the supreme court have, in their three judgments afterwards quoted, namely, executive committee of u.p. state warehousing corporation, lucknow v. chandra kant tyagi air 1970 sc 244, indian airlines corporation v. sukhdeo rai : (1971)illj496sc and vidhya ram misra v. managing committee .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1973Raj289; 1973()WLN233
..... for the grant of mining lease to m/s. bhopal mining works without comparing the merits and demerits of all the applicants under section 11 of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 (hereinafter called the act).5. elaborate arguments have been addressed to this court by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as mr. bhandari .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1974Raj4; 1973()WLN424
..... and in the latter to the legislation by parliament. we have noticed above that the state has not made any other legislation on this subject of regulating the mineral development nor was there any legislation of the union parliament at the relevant time. this article is definitely intended to supplement the meaning of the words ' ..... is subject to the provisions of list i. it is, therefore, clear that the state legislature has also power to legislate as regards the regulation of mines and mineral development, but subject to the legislation made by the parliament under entry no. 54 of list i of the seventh schedule of the constitution. the ..... contract must, therefore, be expressed as required by article 299 of the constitution. according to article 246 of the constitution, 'regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of the union is declared by parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest' is a subject .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1975Raj182; 1977CriLJ169; 1974(7)WLN392; 1974(7)WLN577
..... dismissed on this score also.11. the second preliminary objection relates to the existence of alternative remedy of revision, under section 30 of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957. section 30 of the act confers powers of revision uponthe central government. it reads as under :--'the central government may of its own ..... (ii) that the petitioner did not avail the alternative remedy of revision against the impugned orders of the government under section 30 of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 (lxvii of 1957).7. before i deal with the contentions of mr. mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner on merits, it will be ..... legal enforceable right by moving application on 24-3-1972; that there was an alternative remedy of revision wider section 30 of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957. hereinafter called the act and that the government had power to extend time for the execution of lease under the proviso to rule 18 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1977WLN687
..... and its teachers.21. in upsw corporation lucknow v. c.k. tyagi : (1970)illj32sc , it was held that dismissal though in violation of regulation framed under agricultural produce (development and ware housing) corporation act, 1956 is not in breach of mandatory provisions under the act, employee cannot claim reinstatement.22. in stale of assam ..... law cited by the defendant-appellant has been over-ruled in sukhdeo singh v. bhagatram : (1975)illj399sc , in which it was held that rules and regulations framed by the oil and natural gas commission, life insurance corporation and the industrial finance corporation have the force of law. the employees of these statutory ..... indian airlines corporation to appoint employees under particular type of contract or to terminate them on specific ground hence, though corporation's employee is dismissed in contravention of regulations made under the act, the dismissal cannot be declared as null and void.20. reliance was placed on regina v. st. a.h.e. school : .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)257
..... provisions of law and the petitioner has an alternative remedy open to him of approaching the central government by way of revision under section 30 of the mines and mineral (regulation and development) act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') read with rule 54 of the mineral concession rules 1960 (hereinafter called 'the rules').2. rule 27 of the rules prescribes .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)327
..... , the petitioner was required to show cause why action should not be taken against him under sub-section (4) and (5) of section 21 of the mines and mineral (regulation and development) act, 1957. in response to the said notice, the petitioner submitted his reply wherein he asserted that the pit which was being worked by the petitioner was within the area .....
Tag this Judgment!