Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2004(4)JCR354(Jhr)]
..... occurring the state.viii. decorative, dimensional, building and ornamental stones.such other minerals not specified above subject to provisions of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and other related enactments.'2. it is to be noted that the clause relating to other minerals not specified, was specifically made ..... subject to the provisions of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and other related enactments. the broad framework of the scope of work/investment, including private investment and foreign direct investment routes, included as ..... mining without a valid mining lease. the central government has to be approached in terms of section 5(1) of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act. 1957 and without the previous approval as contemplated therein, no mining lease can be granted by the state government. the central government .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... , west singhbhum at chaibasa to forthwith issue an express order in furtherance of its considered opinion in terms of section 8(3) of the mines minerals (development & regulation) act 1957 in respect of the petitioner's noamundi iron ore mines and pursuant to its application for renewal dated 17.12.2009. (b) an appropriate ..... and the state government itself wrote a letter to the central government opining that the condition contained in section 8(3) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 may be relaxed in the case of petitioner-company however, ignoring its own communication/recommendation, the state government has issued impugned letter ..... the action of the respondents in issuing communication dated 3/4.09.2014 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957.5. mr. rajesh shankar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-state of jharkhand has submitted that in view of decision of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2008(3)JCR301(Jhr)]
..... this court the remedy did not lie in favour of the petitioner but it will be just and proper that the matter is remanded back to the secretary, urban development department, government of jharkhand for taking a final decision. till the decision is taken, the impugned order shall remain in force. this decision must be taken within two ..... 2.2000-after taking into consideration the provisions of patna municipal corporation act, the pension rules. 1986; the gratuity rules, 1983; and the following letters/resolutions of the urban development department-resolution no. 2101 dated 2.7.1991; memo no. 1323 dated 11.4.1991, and memo no. 663 dated 3.2.1981 relied by the petitioner; memo ..... allowance, etc. in view of the resolution under memo no. 663 dated 3.2.1981 and memo no. 1323 dated 11.4.1991 issued by the urban development and housing department, government of bihar the retired employees of the corporation are to be treated at par with the state government employees in the matter of payment of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... common cause (supra) on 4th april, 2016 the impugned order dated 01.04.2016 rejecting the application for renewal after coming into force of mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 2015 appears to be wholly out of place as has also been fairly submitted by learned a.a.g in the case of m/s. ..... rejecting the application of the petitioner for renewal of lease, is bad in law on the following grounds: (i) section 4(a)(1) of mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 1957 confers power on the central government which may request the state government to make premature termination of such mining lease. there is no such request ..... statutory time of one year petitioner applied for renewal for a period of 20 years on 18th april, 2001, which has remained pending till mines & minerals (developments and regulation) amendment act, 2015 was enacted. the mmrd (amendment) ordinance, 2015 had came into force with effect from 12th january, 2015. the mines and minerals .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2007(1)JCR25(Jhr)]
..... act. this by no stretch of imagination means that the action of the state government acquires legislative character.27. there are some provisions under mines and minerals (development & regulation) act, 1957, which require issuance of a notification by the state government. such as sections 15(1) and 17-a(2), which require the state ..... mineral concession rules, 1960 are notified vide gsr no. 1398 dated 11th november, 1960 in exercise of power conferred by section 13 of the mines and minerals (development & regulation) act, 1957 by the ministry of steel, mines and fuel (department of mines & fuel), government of india.14. rule 27 prescribes conditions of mining lease ..... and the central government has no power/authority or jurisdiction to frame rules in respect to major minerals.8. section 13 of the mines and minerals (development & regulation) act, 1957 confers the power on the central government to make rules in respect to minerals and for purposes connected therewith. sub-section (2) of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... sanjay's case (supra), the hon'ble apex court was considering in the question whether the provisions contained in sections 21, 22 and other sections of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 operate as a bar against the prosecution of a person, who has been charged with the allegation, which constitute the offence under sections 379 /114 and the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... respondents with w.p. (s) no. 693 of 2010 prabhu narayan pandey --- --- petitioner versus 1.the state of jharkhand, through its secretary, human resources 3 development department, government of jharkhand, ranchi 2. secretary, commercial taxes department, government of jharkhand 3. commercial taxes additional commissioner, jharkhand, ranchi.4. commercial taxes joint commissioner (administration ..... shall count for pension. rule 60:- the service of a government servant does not qualify unless he is appointed and his duties and pay are regulated by the government, or under conditions determined by the government. the following are examples of government servants exclude from pension by this rule; (1 ..... part-time supervisors, which is belied by the earlier decision of this court. he further contended that since under the government rules and regulations the temporary employees, the ad hoc employees and the work-charged employees are entitled to count their services for the purposes of getting the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... respondents with w.p. (s) no. 693 of 2010 prabhu narayan pandey --- --- petitioner versus 1.the state of jharkhand, through its secretary, human resources 3 development department, government of jharkhand, ranchi 2. secretary, commercial taxes department, government of jharkhand 3. commercial taxes additional commissioner, jharkhand, ranchi.4. commercial taxes joint commissioner (administration ..... shall count for pension. rule 60:- the service of a government servant does not qualify unless he is appointed and his duties and pay are regulated by the government, or under conditions determined by the government. the following are examples of government servants exclude from pension by this rule; (1 ..... part-time supervisors, which is belied by the earlier decision of this court. he further contended that since under the government rules and regulations the temporary employees, the ad hoc employees and the work-charged employees are entitled to count their services for the purposes of getting the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... respondents with w.p. (s) no. 693 of 2010 prabhu narayan pandey --- --- petitioner versus 1.the state of jharkhand, through its secretary, human resources 3 development department, government of jharkhand, ranchi 2. secretary, commercial taxes department, government of jharkhand 3. commercial taxes additional commissioner, jharkhand, ranchi.4. commercial taxes joint commissioner (administration ..... shall count for pension. rule 60:- the service of a government servant does not qualify unless he is appointed and his duties and pay are regulated by the government, or under conditions determined by the government. the following are examples of government servants exclude from pension by this rule; (1 ..... part-time supervisors, which is belied by the earlier decision of this court. he further contended that since under the government rules and regulations the temporary employees, the ad hoc employees and the work-charged employees are entitled to count their services for the purposes of getting the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... respondents with w.p. (s) no. 693 of 2010 prabhu narayan pandey --- --- petitioner versus 1.the state of jharkhand, through its secretary, human resources 3 development department, government of jharkhand, ranchi 2. secretary, commercial taxes department, government of jharkhand 3. commercial taxes additional commissioner, jharkhand, ranchi.4. commercial taxes joint commissioner (administration ..... shall count for pension. rule 60:- the service of a government servant does not qualify unless he is appointed and his duties and pay are regulated by the government, or under conditions determined by the government. the following are examples of government servants exclude from pension by this rule; (1 ..... part-time supervisors, which is belied by the earlier decision of this court. he further contended that since under the government rules and regulations the temporary employees, the ad hoc employees and the work-charged employees are entitled to count their services for the purposes of getting the .....
Tag this Judgment!