Void For Vagueness Doctrine - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: void for vagueness doctrine Page 1 of about 1,933 results (0.058 seconds)S. Bharat Kumar Vs. Chief Election Commissioner of India and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: 1995(1)ALT(Cri)230; 1995CriLJ2608
this vagueness renders the G.O. void since the doctrine of void for vagueness is applicable to us. Further, the persons applying held that 'no law will be considered bad for sheer vagueness' is not an absolute principle. Again, also after referring to had the occasion to advert to the question whether the doctrine of 'void for vagueness' is applicable in India. Thereafter referring
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Rama Shetty Vs. The Chief Secretary
Court: Karnataka
20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Krishnadeveraya Education Trust Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
WITHOUT COMPETENCE AND JURISDICTION AND OTHERWISE BEING ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND VOID AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.5389/2018: BETWEEN: P.G. RAMESH S/O. GANAPAIAH,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri D R Siddaramaiah Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
WITHOUT COMPETENCE AND JURISDICTION AND OTHERWISE BEING ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND VOID. IN W.P. NO.14390/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. H. VISHWANATH S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR Ramanand Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF2011AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamesh Padathare Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
SECTION4AND5OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT, 2011, AS ILLEGAL, VOID AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IN W.P. NO.13112/2018: BETWEEN:1. . R. RAMANAND105S/O RAJANAHALLI
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri H Vishwanath Vs. The Tahasildhar
Court: Karnataka
SECTION4AND5OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT, 2011, AS ILLEGAL, VOID AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IN W.P. NO.13112/2018: BETWEEN:1. . R. RAMANAND105S/O RAJANAHALLI
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThariq Khan Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
WITHOUT COMPETENCE AND JURISDICTION AND OTHERWISE BEING ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND VOID. IN W.P. NO.14390/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. H. VISHWANATH S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG Basavaraja Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
SECTION4AND5OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT, 2011, AS ILLEGAL, VOID AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IN W.P. NO.13112/2018: BETWEEN:1. . R. RAMANAND105S/O RAJANAHALLI
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK Mugileshwari Vs. The Chief Secretary
Court: Karnataka
SECTION4AND5OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT, 2011, AS ILLEGAL, VOID AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IN W.P. NO.13112/2018: BETWEEN:1. . R. RAMANAND105S/O RAJANAHALLI
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>