Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: visva bharati act 1951 section 8 university to be open to all races creeds and classes Court: delhi

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. Sir Ganga Ram Trust Society

Court : Delhi

..... be brought within the mischief of the act."we have no hesitation to hold that the aforesaid view expressed by the learned judge is not correct or sound and that the ..... provisions and or the purview of the act, the different branches or departments of the university which the university is empowered and or entitled to maintain under the provision of the visva bharati act cannot ..... , w.b. manu/wb/0382/1982 : (1983)illj332cal , wherein it was held that the provisions of the act were inapplicable in respect of a "silpa sadan", agricultural farm and a hospital run by the visva bharati university. the learned judge was of the view that "if the university as an establishment does not come under the .....

Vestas Rrb India Ltd. Vs. Additional Cit, Range 17

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

..... to be counted on stand alone basis is dealt with as under.12. according to sub-section (5), notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of the act, the profits and gains of eligible business to which the provisions of sub-section (1) applies shall, for the purpose of determining the quantum of deduction under ..... hundred per cent of the profits and gains derived from such business for ten consecutive assessment years. (5) notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this act, the profits and gains of an eligible business to which theprovisions of sub-section (1) apply shall, for the purposes of determining the quantum of deduction under ..... entirely out of wind power which is entirely due to nature's bounty. that involves no visible or invisible expenditure at all, and in that situation, the act of the assessing officer in loading on to this activity, the expenditure on repair and maintenance and depreciation, was totally fallacious and entirely uncalled for. 12. .....

S.N. Aggarwal Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996IIAD(Delhi)565; 63(1996)DLT865

..... forfeit a penalty. a baker was charged under section 4 of the act with selling bread otherwise than by weight and was convicted in presence of two justices. he obtained a rule nisi for a writ of certiorari to quash the conviction on ..... , (1914) 1 kb 608, the court held as under : 'by section 15 of the bread act, 1836, no person who shall be concerned in the business of a baker shall be capable of acting or shall be allowed to act as a justice of the peace under the act, and if any baker shall presume so to do he shall for every such offence .....

U.S.Pandey President of W.A.S. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... obtained registration with the election commission of india (eci) by fraud. he states : the clearance that he deceitfully obtained from eci was a prima facie illegal act of usurpation of judicial powers/jurisdiction of trial courts, by media trial caused by these offenders, including editors, contemnors, toi and ht and others. it was ..... captioned: criminal complaint u/s 420, 120a and b, 307, 395, 341 (and all the offences on record being abetted) ipc1860 the prevention of corruptions act, contempt of court act; and other provisions of laws against dacoit commissioner of police, a.r.sharma sho ramesh chander (accused-dacoit), o.p.kejariwal accused cheat thug, sonia ..... continue. he would make grievance against the bench which was seized of his writ petition.59. dealing with the constitutionality of the anti vexatious litigation (prevention) act, 1949 by the state of tamil nadu, in the decision reported as air1965sc1827prabhakar rao h.mawle vs. state of a.p. the supreme court observed that .....

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Uma Shankar Pandey

Court : Delhi

..... obtained registration with the election commission of india (eci) by fraud. he states : the clearance that he deceitfully obtained from eci was a prima facie illegal act of usurpation of judicial powers/jurisdiction of trial courts, by media trial caused by these offenders, including editors, contemnors, toi and ht and others. it was ..... captioned: criminal complaint u/s 420, 120a and b, 307, 395, 341 (and all the offences on record being abetted) ipc1860 the prevention of corruptions act, contempt of court act; and other provisions of laws against dacoit commissioner of police, a.r.sharma sho ramesh chander (accused-dacoit), o.p.kejariwal accused cheat thug, sonia ..... continue. he would make grievance against the bench which was seized of his writ petition.59. dealing with the constitutionality of the anti vexatious litigation (prevention) act, 1949 by the state of tamil nadu, in the decision reported as air1965sc1827prabhakar rao h.mawle vs. state of a.p. the supreme court observed that .....

Uma Shankar Pandey President of W.A.S. Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... obtained registration with the election commission of india (eci) by fraud. he states : the clearance that he deceitfully obtained from eci was a prima facie illegal act of usurpation of judicial powers/jurisdiction of trial courts, by media trial caused by these offenders, including editors, contemnors, toi and ht and others. it was ..... captioned: criminal complaint u/s 420, 120a and b, 307, 395, 341 (and all the offences on record being abetted) ipc1860 the prevention of corruptions act, contempt of court act; and other provisions of laws against dacoit commissioner of police, a.r.sharma sho ramesh chander (accused-dacoit), o.p.kejariwal accused cheat thug, sonia ..... continue. he would make grievance against the bench which was seized of his writ petition.59. dealing with the constitutionality of the anti vexatious litigation (prevention) act, 1949 by the state of tamil nadu, in the decision reported as air1965sc1827prabhakar rao h.mawle vs. state of a.p. the supreme court observed that .....

Micrographics India vs.the Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... even this argument is misconceived because even assuming for the sake of arguments that instead of articles 14, 15 and 18 the residuary article 113 of the limitation act applies as contended on behalf of the appellant/plaintiff, yet the residuary article 113 also provides a period of three years, and once invoices are raised after work ..... is taken to be an acknowledgement of liability, then every reply to legal notice which denies the liability would also come within the purview of section 18 of limitation act, thus, rending the law of limitation meaning less. 7.12. this issue is accordingly decided in favour of defendant and cs no.20860/2016 micrographics india vs ..... liable to pay the charges for the goods and services supplied, as per the invoices raised by the plaintiff company. 7.9. as per section 18 of limitation act, if before expiration of the prescribed period of limitation, any acknowledgement of liability in respect of the right/property is made in writing, signed by the party .....

M.L. Sharma Vs. Adarsh P.V. Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT45; 2003(68)DRJ306

..... , this court, thereforee, is of the considered view that prima facie the suit filed by the plaintiff does not appear to be barred by section 90 of the act.7. the prayer made by the plaintiff in his application is neither unreasonable nor unjust for the reason that the plaintiff is trying to safeguard and protect not only ..... constitution, management or the business of a cooperative society. the electrification work done by the plaintiff for the defendant society does not prima facie appear to be an act touching the business of the society as the society is not engaged in the construction and sale of the flats and it is merely a cooperative society constructing flats ..... business of a society.6. before considering the rival contentions of the parties on the question of the maintainability of the suit in view of section 90 of the act, this court must state at the outset that the question of the maintainability of the suit shall be considered by this court at the appropriate stage only. while .....

H.S Dhillon Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... word misconduct on reflection receives its connotation from the context, the delinquency in performance and its effect on the discipline and the nature of the duty. the act complained of must bear a forbidden quality or character and its ambit has to be construed with reference to the subject-matter and the context wherein the term ..... has also referred to storys equity jurisprudence and defined fraud as: fraud, in the contemplation of a civil court of justice, may be said to include properly all acts, omissions, and concealments which involve a breach of legal or equitable duty, trust or confidence, justly reposed, and are injurious to another, or by which an undue ..... pension; and (c) to be severely reprimanded. goc 31 armoured division ordered revision of the sentence for the purpose of reconsidering the sentence in terms of army act section 160 read with army rule 68. on revision, it was converted into dismissal from service. the chief of army staff confirmed the said finding and sentence. .....

Subramaniam Swamy Vs. Indian Institute of Technology

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 28(1985)DLT524; 1985RLR529

..... arbitrator. these questions go to the root of the order of termination and cannot stop at the stage of arbitration only. i do not think that section 30 of the act stands in the way of the suit filed by the petitioner. (10) for the reasons stated above, the revision petition is accepted. the impugned judgments of the additional district ..... the dismissal of the suit in the present case on the ground of non-maintainability was thus patently contrary to law. (9) section 30, sub-section 3 of the act bars the suits or proceedings in any court in respect of any matter which is required by sub-section (1) to be referred to the tribunal of arbitration. the allahabad ..... . he cannot, thereforee, be non-suited on the ground that he was working only under the contract of personal service by invoking section 14(1)(b) of the specific relief act. mrs. shyamla pappu, appearing for the i.i.t., has, however, referred to another decision of the supreme court in t.c.m. pillai v. technology institute, guindy : ( .....