Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: unlawful Court: karnataka Page 11 of about 3,283 results (0.019 seconds)

Basavaraj Shivaramagouda Patil Vs. Mahesh

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR419

..... in view of these principles laid down in these decisions it is clear that the plaintiff who is in possession of the suit property under a colour of right, even assuming he is in unlawful possession the defendant has no right to take the law into his own hands and dispossess him except in accordance with law, even assuming that the defendant is the true owner of the suit property. .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Dr. H.A. Ramaswamy and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT(Cri)635; ILR1996KAR1107; 1996(2)KarLJ1

..... to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or (b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand. ..... to attract clause (b) of the explanation to section 498a, there must be harassment with a view to coerce her or her relative to meet any unlawful demand for property or valuable security or on account of refusal to meet such demand. .....

Shivappa Laxman Savadi Vs. the State

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2845; 1991(3)KarLJ728

..... penal code, governing the exercise of the right of private defence are as follows :- the code excepts from the operation of its penal clauses large classes of acts done in good faith for the purpose of repelling unlawful aggression but this right has been regulated and circumscribed by several principles and limitations. ..... the right of private defence is available for protection against apprehended unlawful aggression and not for punishing the aggressor for the offence committed by him. .....

Syed Nizaiulla Vs. Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Ksrtc

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1990(60)FLR124]; ILR1989KAR2249; 1989(2)KarLJ389

..... bhat, conductor who had indulged in malpractice of issuing tickets by reshaping the tickets providing higher denominational value and making unlawful personal gain, but failed to point out the irregularities, due to which, the conductor could continue to indulge in such pilferage.circular no. .....

Fci Loading and Unloading Workers Union Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR2579

..... (3) the act does not protect the workmen against unlawful termination of their services by their immediate employer and therefore the i.d. .....

Suryakant Narasingsa Jadi Vs. Yallappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR997; 2006(6)KarLJ451

..... 5 is that of a second mortgagee wherein there is a privity of contract between the plaintiffs and defendants 1 and 2 in turn, defendants 1 and 2 for unlawful gain have subsequently mortgaged the suit properties in favour of defendants 3 and 4 and defendant no. ..... , defendants 1 and 2 for unlawful gain have transferred their mortgage right in favour of defendants 3 and 4 on 17.4.1980 by a registered mortgage deed and defendant no. .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Dandeppa S/O. Nagappa and ors

Court : Karnataka

..... as such complaint was registered under section 3(a) of railway property (unlawful possession) act, 1966 hereinafter called 'the act'. ..... 492/1999, acquitting the respondent-accused for the offence punishable under section 3(a) of railway property (unlawful possession) act. .....

State Bank of Mysore Vs. The Karnataka Industrial Co-Operative Bank Lt ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the first defendant is stated to have collected the above demand drafts which are forged ones as a result of which defendant no.2 is stated to have made unlawful gain. 7. .....

Basappa Balappa Bhangi and Others Vs. State by Dharwad Rural Police St ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(1)ALT(Cri)228; 1999CriLJ2689; 1999(1)KarLJ197

..... sebastian submits that even if the prosecution case is partially accepted, that for the aforesaid reasons the charge of unlawful assembly would have to fail completely in so far as there could not have been five or more assailants for the reasons indicated and secondly, that at the very highest accused 3 would be liable ..... emphasised a few of the final points which we have indicated above, we see no reason whatsoever or no ground on which the finding of the trial court that all the accused were part of an unlawful assembly and that they were liable for the consequences of the acts in unison, can be disturbed. 6. ..... sebastian submits that this evidence goesagainst the prosecution theory that the accused were part of an unlawful assembly and shared the common motivation both of which ingredients are crucial because the conviction of the other eight accused virtually runs along with ..... the prosecution alleges that the nine accused were members of an unlawful assembly, that they were armed with axes and sickles and that on ..... insofar as the charge of rioting and unlawful assembly and section 302 of the ipc are ..... any difference because the criminal liability for the injury would devolve on all those accused who are members of the unlawful assembly in so far as the law provides for this. ..... of the present type for a death and grievous injury is almost a deemed liability insofar as the act of one is the act of all, provided the court is satisfied that the accused were members of an unlawful assembly. .....

Mysore Machinery Manufacturers Ltd. Vs. State of Mysore and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1969Mys51; 1969CriLJ221

..... the commissioner of police refers to the order of dismissal passed against 270 workmen (including the office-bearers of the union) and states as follows:'the abovesaid 270 workers of the factory still continue to remain unlawfully and unauthorisedly within the precincts of the factory and have, in fact, stayed within the premises of the factory without interruption from 1-4-67 to the time of making this application. ..... whoever enters into or upon property in the possession of another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy any person in possession of such property, or, having lawfully entered into or upon such property, unlawfully remains there with intent thereby to intimidate, insult or annoy any such person, or with intent to commit any offence, is said to commit 'criminal trespass'. ..... the bank the employees committed criminal trespass inasmuch as they either entered unlawfully or having lawfully entered continue to remain there unlawfully with intent thereby to insult or annoy their superior officers. ..... even if we assume that the employees' entry in the premises was unlawful, it is difficult to appreciate the argument that the said entry was made with intent to insult or annoy the ..... the ousting of the owner from lawful possession is not essentially different from an assault upon the officers of an employing company or the seizure and conversion of its goods, or the despoiling of its property or other unlawful acts in order to force compliance with demands. .....