Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: unlawful activities prevention act 1967 Page 100 of about 15,830 results (0.133 seconds)

Neelam Wines Vs. Commissioner of Police, Chatta Bazar, Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1981AP191

..... normally permissible to the state to prevent a person from doing his lawful business or carrying on his lawful activity on the basis that some other person or persons might be provoked to disturb peace, because of those lawful acts. ..... but the will of a modern constitutional functionary in a democratic republic must be founded in his stated cause.it is for that reason that the american federal administrative act requires all administrative decisions to include a statement of findings and conclusions and reasons and the court of appeals for the district of columbia has declared 'the necessity for administrative agencies to ..... there is little doubt, that this definition of a place of public entertainment as including a wine shop, is artificial viewing from the point of the preambulatory objectives of the act, it is difficult to see how the running of a wine shop where liquor is merely sold in bottles without its being consumed on the premises could ever have anything to do with 'law ..... might not be punished for acting lawfully even if he acts in the knowledge that by his so doing he might lead another man to act unlawfully. ..... for dispersal of the unlawful crowd probably different consideration ..... act of disobedience of the magisterial orders their leaders were charged with the offence of unlawful ..... not disperse an otherwise lawful assembly simply because of opposition from another body and directed that the police should direct their attention to dealing with the unlawful counter-demonstration. .....

Anakala Maddileti Vs. Govt. A.P., Home Department, Hyderabad and Other ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(5)ALD258; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)348; 1999(4)ALT743; 1999CriLJ4126

..... detenu and his henchmen and the offences committed by the detenu would fall under chapters xvi, xvii and xxii of ipc and as such, the detenu is a goonda within the meaning of section 2(g) of the act no.1 of 1986 and in order to prevent the activities of the detenu which are prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, the order of detention is passed.writ petition no.8718 of 1999 :one edagotha lakshmi wife of edagotha hanwianthu has moved this court ..... . despite many police cases have been booked against the detenu, he indulged in unlawful smuggling activities of timber and assaulting the forest personnel and therefore the respondents have justified that in order to prevent him from his illegal activity in smuggling and to prevent further loss to the government exchequer and as the detenu has become threat to the normal work of the government machinery and to prevent further damage being caused the detention order is passed.writ petition no. ..... the petitioner alleged that on the above grounds the second respondent came to the conclusion that the detenu is a notorious smuggler of timber and also a goonda within the meaning of section 2(g) of act no.1 of 1986 acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of legitimate duties of forest officials within the meaning of section 2(a) of the said act which has necessitated for ordering detention to prevent him from indulging in the unlawful smuggling activities of timber and assaulting the forest officials.6. .....

In Re: Noise Pollution - Implementation of the Laws for Restricting Us ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC3136; 2005(3)AWC2685(SC); 2005(5)BomCR553; 121(2005)DLT547(SC); [2005(4)JCR4(SC)]; JT2005(6)SC210; (2005)5SCC733

..... . residents welfare associations (raws), service clubs (such as rotary international and lions international) and societies engaged in preventing noise pollution as part of their projects need to be encouraged and actively involved by the local administration ..... drums or by use of voice amplifiers, loudspeakers or by such other musical instruments and, therefore, rules prescribing reasonable restrictions including the rules for the use of loudspeakers and voice amplifiers framed under the madras town nuisances act, 1889 and also the noise pollution (regulation and control) rules, 2000 are required to be enforced ..... . under section 268 of this code, it is mentioned that 'a person is guilty of a public nuisance who does any act or is guilty of an illegal omission which causes any common injury, danger or annoyance to the public or the people in general who dwell or occupy property in the vicinity, or which must necessarily cause injury, obstruction, danger or annoyance to persons ..... . section 2 of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, includes noise in the definition of 'air pollutant'. 15 ..... . this act makes provision about noise emitted from dwellings at night; about the forfeiture and confiscation of equipment used to make noise unlawfully; and for connected purposes .....

Delhi Stock Exchange Association Limited Vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Kara ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000(55)DRJ681; [2000(86)FLR705]; (2000)IILLJ436Del

..... with the legitimate rights of the labour to pursue their agitation by means of a strike, so long as it does not indulge in acts unlawful and tortious and defendants/workers were restrained from preventing the officers and managerial staff of the plaintiffs or any member of the public entering or leaving the premises of the plaintiff and from holding out threats or intimidation or indulging in gherao on wrongful confinement of the ..... that their demands had been mutually settled and there was no occasion to go on strike and still they held unruly demonstrations and strikes in the premises of the plaintiff obstructing and preventing its smooth and peaceful business activities and also obstructing ingres and egress of the staff, willing workers and the public. ..... in the suit, the plaintiff has alleged that the defendants have been illegally and unjustifiably holding demonstrations, shouting slogans, indulging in illegal and unjustified activities of gherao, sabotage, manhandling and causing blockage to the ingress and egress threatening the managers, brokers, investors, general public and willing employees to press their illegal and unjustified demands during trading ..... considered the scope of the power of the court and the rights of both the employers and the workmen in this respect and it has been observed as under:-'demonstrations, gheraos and such other activities are the means and tools through which the workers and the workmen ventilate their grievances against the management. .....

Anitha Bruse Vs. State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(2)KLJ170; 2008(2)KLT857

..... it is also prayed to declare that the detention of her husband under the kerala anti-social activities (prevention) act, 2007 (act 34 of 2007) (hereinafter referred to for short as 'the act' only) is violative of articles 14, 19, 21 and 22 of the constitution of india as the procedural safeguards have been ..... according to the first respondent, the petitioner's husband is detained in pursuance of an order made under a law providing for preventive detention and in issuing the said order and executing the same, all procedural requirements as mandated by the provisions of the statute, namely the kerala anti- social activities (prevention) act, 2007 and article 22(5) of the constitution have been strictly complied with. ..... the preamble of act 34 of 2007 namely, the kerala anti-social activities (prevention) act, 2007 states 'whereas, it is expedient specifically to provide for the effective prevention and control of certain kind of anti-social activities in the state ..... result, we hold that section 12 of the kerala anti-social activities (prevention) act, 2007 (act no. ..... 52/2007, under trial now, it is stated that he has been involved in an unlawful assembly, a gang of accomplices and attacked a lady at her home at mid night on 15.1.2007 alleging that she informed the police about his illegal ..... a case arose out of a petition filed under article 32 of the constitution of india before the supreme court with a prayer for the release of the petitioner therein from the alleged unlawful detention. .....

Devi Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1952Raj171

..... safety or interest or to the defence of british india, whereas rule 26 gave the government power to arrest and detain any particular person only on being satisfied that it wag necessary so to do with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of british india, the public safety, the maintenance of public order, his majesty's relations with foreign powers or indian states, the maintenance of peaceful conditions in tribal areas or the ..... 26 of the reply in the case of the first petitioner and paragraphs 17 and 20 in the case of the second petitioner, it is said that the acts of the petitioners were unlawful and dangerous to the security of the state and maintenance of public order in the state of rajasthan. ..... member of the committee and you have been actively and secretly assisting unlawful aim. 5. ..... that as an influential leader of bhomias he has been actively associated with resistance movement of bhomias of udaipurwati over the issue of the grain produce rents payable to them ..... that as an influential landlord of mandawa he has been actively associated with the resistance movement of bhomias of udaipurwati over the issue of the grain produce rents payable to them ..... instigating the bhomias of udaipurwati particularly of chirana and jhajhar to eject the tenants unlawfully & to use force and violence in case of resistance. 3. ..... that he has been in active association with the bhomias of udaipurwati, particularly, the bhomias of deeppura ponk and ghuda who are .....

Abdul Ahad Rather Vs. State of J and K and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2005(2)JKJ306

..... alleged that the detention of the detenu has been passed on the ground that ordinary law of the land is not enough as a corrective measure to prevent the detenu from the activities prejudicial to the security of the state and that the order is not sustainable in view of the law laid down by this court in various authorities ..... psa of 2003 dated 12.09.2003 with a view to prevent the detenu from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the state ..... against him is that he was working over ground worker of j.e.m, the unlawful organisation and that his aim and object was to indulge in such nefarious activities which were highly prejudicial to the security of the state. ..... the court held:-'the very object of passing a detention order being to prevent the person from acting in any manner prejudicial to maintenance of public order or from smuggling goods or dealing in ..... now, therefore, in pursuance of sub section 2 of section 13 of the said act, you are hereby informed that your detention has been ordered on the ground specified in ..... 307,149,120 rpc, and 7/25 arms act of police station lalpora, kupwara, fir no ..... authority has come to the conclusion that ordinary law of the land will not serve as a corrective, hence, his detention under the provisions of j&k; public safety act 1978 (for short the act) becomes imperative,2. ..... 12.09.2003 reads as under:'whereas, you have been detained vide order no: 07 dmk/psa of 2003 dated 12.09.2003 made by me under section 8 of j&k; public safety act 1978. .....

Smith and Others Vs. the Ministry of Defence and Others

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... . in paras 59-61 the court examined the difference between the primary positive obligation under that article to establish a framework of laws and procedures to protect life and the obligation to take preventative operational measures to protect the life of an individual which may be imposed by implication, as it was put in osman v united kingdom (1998) 29 ehrr 245, para 115, only in certain and ..... the court held that the facts had been sufficiently investigated and that: "the wider questions raised by the case as to the background of assaults and the remedial measures apt to prevent any recurrence in a prison in the future are, in the court's opinion, matters for public and political debate which fall outside the scope of article 3 of ..... claimants concentrate instead on an alleged failure to ensure that the claimants' tank and the tanks of the battle group that fired on it were properly equipped with technology and equipment that would have prevented the incident, and an alleged failure to ensure that soldiers were provided with adequate recognition training before they were deployed and also in ..... the present case, which concerns an accident during a military training exercise, the court notes that while it may indeed be considered that the armed forces' activities pose a risk to life, this is a situation which differs from those 'dangerous' situations of specific threat to life which arise exceptionally from risks posed by violent, unlawful acts of others or man-made or natural .....

Nitya Nand Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the larger public interest to maintain the tranquility of the society and prevent wrongdoers (who actively collaborate or assist the commission of offences) claiming impunity on the ground that their activity as members of the unlawful assembly is limited. * * * * * 34. ..... creates a constructive or vicarious liability of the members of the unlawful assembly for the unlawful acts committed pursuant to the common object by any other member of ..... section 149 ipc creates a constructive or vicarious liability of the members of the unlawful assembly for the unlawful acts committed pursuant to the common object by any other member of that assembly. ..... the very act of the appellant in firing from his country- made pistol to enable the accused persons to escape is clearly an overt act whereby he became part of the unlawful assembly with a common object to ..... position that section 149 ipc does not create a separate offence but only declares vicarious liability of all members of the unlawful assembly for acts done in common object. ..... or more persons is designated as unlawful assembly if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is to commit an illegal act by means of criminal force.28. ..... gather together (assemble) and commit an offence, it is possible that only some of the members of the assembly commit the crucial act which renders the transaction an offence and the remaining members do not take part in that crucial act for example in a case of murder, the infliction of the fatal injury. .....

United States Vs. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Ry. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the following circumstances and conditions: (a) when the article or commodity has been manufactured, mined, or produced by a carrier or under its authority, and at the time of transportation, the carrier has not, in good faith, before the act of transportation, dissociated itself from such article or commodity; (b) when the carrier owns the article or commodity to be transported, in whole or in part; (c) when the carrier at the time of transportation, has an interest, direct ..... one to prevent probable future unlawful conduct, and not to punish acts long since ..... of control through holding company ownership of all the capital stock both of an interstate rail carrier and a shipper producing the commodity carried, plus an active exercise of that control, are enough to make the transportation unlawful. ..... was subject to cancellation by reason of the receivership of the chicago & eastern illinois, it was the chairman of the board of the steel corporation who actively controlled the successful negotiation for a continuance of the agreement. ..... the chairman of the board of the steel corporation, not the officers of appellee, who had the deciding voice in determining whether the lease should be taken and who assumed active control of the negotiations for its acquisition. ..... the active and continuous control over appellee's finances and expenditures is alone sufficient to create a continuing danger of neglect and abuse of appellee's carrier duties in favor of the dominating production and shipping .....