Court : Delhi
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes 1. The Petitioner is the widow of deceased Shri Sita Ram who died in a terrorist attack on 22nd May 2005 at 8.20 pm in the Liberty Cinema Hall owned by Respondent No. 2. The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD), Respondent No. 1, gave the Petitioner an ex gratia amount of Rs.1 lakh. The deceased left behind the Petitioner and two minor children aged five and three years. In the circumstances, the present petition has been filed for directions to Respondent Nos.1 & 2 to jointly and severally pay damages in the sum of Rs.9,60,000/- calculated inter alia on the basis that the Petitioners late husband who was working as a plumber and was aged 30 years, earning an amount of Rs.4,000/- per month.2. A reply on behalf of Respondent No.1 has been filed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) (Sp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. A. 953/2013 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2013 + # ! AAMIR ABBAS DEV . Appellant Through: Mr. Ravi Qazi, Advocate versus $ * STATE THROUGH NIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Sharma & Ms. Shilpa Singh Spl. PP for NIA & Mr. Som Prakash, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH ORDER P.K. BHASIN, J: This is an appeal by an accused turned approver against the order dated 5th June,2013 of the Special Court constituted under the National Investigation Agency Act,2008(NIA Act in short) whereby his application for his release from jail, where he was lodged after his arrest for his involvement in the bomb blast which took place on 7 th September,2011 near the reception booth in between entrance gate nos.4 and 5 of Delhi High Court, was dismissed.2. On 7th September, 2011 at about 10.14 a.m. a bomb blast took place near the reception counter between entrance gate nos. 4 and 5 of the Delhi High Court whe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:16. h November, 2016 CRL.A. 642/2016 MOHD NASER PACKEER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.S. Khan, Adv. versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Abhishek Bagaria, SPP, Ms. Rajul Jain and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, J Crl.M.A.No.10879/2016 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented from sufficient cause from filing the appeal belatedly. Therefore, delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned and the application is allowed. CRL.A. 642/2016 1. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 21(4) of the National Investigating Agency Act, 2008 Crl. A. 642/2016 Page 1 of 5 (NIA Act hereafter) assailing an order dated 8th April, 2016 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge, Special Court (NIA), New...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :17. h APRIL, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 923/2017 ........ Petitioner FASIH MAHMOOD Through : Ms.Nitya Ramakrishnan, Advocate with Ms.Suhasini Sen, Mr.S. Naved, Ms.Sunaina Pihul & Ms.Priyanka Rao, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : Mr.Amit Chadha, APP with Insp.Ravinder Joshi, Special Cell. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner Fasih Mahmood seeks regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.54/2011 registered under Sections 471/489B/489C/120B IPC; Sections 16/18/Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, (in short UAPA); Section 25 Arms Act and Sections 3,4,5 Explosive Substances Act at PS Special Cell, Lodhi Colony. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file.... Petitioners counsel urged that the petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2012. At present, he is facing trial only for commission of offence ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1972Delhi883
Jagjit Singh, J. (1) The petitioner in this case, Shri Chaman Lal Chhabra, an officiating Deputy Superintendent of Police, was on the night between the 31st December 1967 and the 1st January 1968 in-charge of the Police Station Parliament Street, New Delhi. On that night the free flow of traffic was obstructed, at certain places in the Connaught Place area, by groups of merry-making persons. Not only some cars and other vehicles were stopped and damaged but some persons even misbehaved towards ladies, and there were a few incidents of stabbing and snatching away of ornaments. The authorities naturally took a serious view of these acts of rowdism. As it was considered that adequate patrolling was not done by the petitioner and the situation was allowed to go out of control, the petitioner was placed under suspension and disciplinary proceedings were started against him. (2) The petitioner is a Police officer of long standing and had even rendered military service for about seven years b...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 486/2010 & Crl.M.B. 648/2012 Reserved on:16. h January, 2013 Decided on:23. d April, 2013 % MOHD AMIN KHAN Through ..... Appellant Mr. M.M. Khan, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP with Inspector Umesh Barthwal, PS Spl. Cell. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By the present appeal, the Appellant challenges the judgment dated 18th February, 2010 whereby he has been convicted for offences under Section 120B read with Section 122 IPC, Section 122 read with Section 120B IPC and Section 40 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, (in short UAP Act) and the order on sentence dated 25th February, 2010 whereby he has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 122 IPC read with Section 120B IPC; and 5 years and a fine of 10,000/- under Section 120B read with Section 122 IPC and 10 years rigorous imprisonment with Rs. 10,000/- as fine under Se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. 02.2013 WRIT PETITION(CRIMINAL) NO.86/2013 MUSTAFA USMAN LANDGE .. Petitioner Through: Mr. Mehmood Pracha and Mr. Sumit Babbar, Advocates. Versus UOI & ORS. Through: .. Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Ms. Richa Sharma, Mr. Mohd. Adnan and Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) 1. The respondents have placed on record copy of the judicial order dated 29.11.2012 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon Section 269 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and submits that the Jail Superintendant should not have carried out or implemented or complied with the order dated 29.11.2012. Section 269 of the CrPC which has been relied upon by the learned counsel for the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 926/2010 Decided on:9. h April, 2013 MOHD. ISSA @ RAJ Through ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Mr. Shiv Kumar Dwivedi, Mr. Y. Bhattacharya, Advs. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP with SI Satish Rana, PS Spl. Cell, Lodhi Colony CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against judgment dated 22nd October, 2009 convicting the Appellant for offences under Section 5 of the Explosive Substance Act, 1908 (in short the ES Act) read with Section 18 and 23 of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1957 (in short the UAP Act) besides Section 120B IPC. The Appellant has also challenged the order on sentence dated 26th October, 2009 whereby the following sentences have been awarded to the Appellant. (i) Rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of 1 year under S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 09.2013 Pronounced on:07. 10.2013 + W.P.(C) 5598/2013, C.M. No.12403/2013 Mhmd. SHAKEEL ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Jawahar Raja and Sh. Rajat Kumar, Advocates. versus THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Gautam Khazanchi, for Sh. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate, for Resp. No.1. Sh. Khyati Sharma, for Ms. Sonia Sharma, for GNCTD. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Sh. Nitesh Singh and Sh. Vaibhav Misra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present writ petition seeks the issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the decision of the High Court of Delhi in its administrative jurisdiction, as conveyed by the Registrar (Vigilance) of the Court to all District and Sessions Judges, by Order No.39994009/DHC/Gaz./G-1/2013, dated 3rd August, 2013 (the impugned decision). This decision mandates that all cases investigated by the Special Cell of the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~28 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:13. h September, 2017 CRL. A. No.604/2016 MUFTI ABDUS SAMI QASMI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Jawahar Raja, Adv. with Mr.Rajat Kumar & Mr.Chinmay Kanojia, Advs. versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr.Neel Kamal, PP, NIA & Ms.Rajul Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 21 (4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 impugning the order dated 10.06.2016 passed by the District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge, NIA) in RC-14/2015/NIA/DLI arising from an FIR under Section 125 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 18, 18-B, 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 [in short the UA (P) Act]. whereby the application for grant of bail under Section 167 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) filed on be...
Tag this Judgment!