Trade Union - Judgment Search Results

National Aviators Guild Being a Trade Union Vs. the Registrar of Trade ...

Court: Mumbai

Yerwada and ors., - 2009(4) Mh.L.J.95 and The Registrar of Trade Unions, Mysore vs. M.Mariswamy (1974) Lab I.C., 695 (V 7 to the extent it meets allegations leveled by the Petitioner Union against Respondent no.5 and not any further. 17. The Tribunal,

Shramik Sena a trade union, registered under the Trade Unions Act, 192 ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(6)ALLMR708; 2006(5)BomCR616; (2006)IIILLJ628Bom

illegal under the Act; or (vi) its registration under the Trade Unions Act, 1926 is cancelled; or (vii) another union has -Union under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (for short

Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha a Trade Union Registered Under the Trade Unions ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(4)ALLMR130

any reason whatsoever, it would lead to disastrous results. A trade union would then be permitted to function and claim that by the Union for recognition in place of a recognised Union unless a period of one year has elapsed since the

Kamgaranchao Ekvott, a Trade Union Registered Under the Trade Union Ac ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(6)BomCR474; [2004(102)FLR316]; (2004)IIILLJ111Bom

in distinguishing a decision of this Court in V.V.F. Employees' Union v. S.M. Limaye and Ors., (1990) 1 CLR 359. In

Registrar of Trade Unions and Joint Labour Commissioner. (H.Q.) Vs. La ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ1226Raj; 1996(2)WLN402

there was an outrageous attitude on the part of the Trade Union in not co-operating with the Registrar and not allowing on the part of the human agency of the Trade Union. The learned Single Judge further found that the Registrar can

Registrar of Trade Unions, West Bengal Vs. Mihir Kumar Gooha

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1963Cal56,[1962(5)FLR339],(1963)ILLJ100Cal

'industry' as defined in the said Act means, 'any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling or employments and includes any calling, by subscribing their names to the rules of the trade union, and by otherwise complying with the provisions of the said

All India Trade Union Congress Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

BHAVANA BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU - 560029 3. PRESIDENT ALL INDIA TRADE UNION CONGRESS (AITUC) NO.27, 6TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN - 68 KARMIKA BHAVANA BANNERGHATTA ROAD BANGALORE-560029 3. PRESIDENT ALL INDIA TRADE UNION CONGRESS (AITUC) No.27, 6TH CROSS4H MAIN, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560003 4. BHARATIYA

Gujarat Trade Union Manch Vs. Gujarat State Textile Corporation

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2000]99CompCas461(Guj)

It is claimed that petitioner No. 2 is a registered trade union, having members both in the engineering as well as to them; (5) Respondent No. 3 is not a representative union and it had no authority to enter into compromise or

All India Trade Union Congress and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2005KAR3052; 2005(5)KarLJ414; (2006)ILLJ344Kant

of sufficient duration having regard to the nature of industry, trade, business, manufacture or occupation carried on in that establishment;(c) Whether 28677-78/2001. However it is further stated that Engineering General Workers Union has entered into settlement with the Contractor regarding wages etc

All India Trade Union Congress Vs. Ravi Fisheries Limited and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2000(1)BomCR612; (2000)IILLJ745Bom

J.1. By this contempt petition, the petitioner viz. All India Trade Union Congress prays that respondent Nos. 1 to 3 be the 1st of August, 1998, the demand raised by the union on behalf of the concerned workers that they should be