Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: title Sorted by: old Court: uttaranchal Page 5 of about 439 results (0.017 seconds)

Rameshwar Havelia Vs. Asian Agro Farms India Ltd. and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2753

..... permanent injunction against the defendant (rameshwar havelia, his workmen and agent) from asserting any right whatsoever of any kind over the suit property and also restrain him from interfering the right, title and possession of the plaintiff (asian agro farms india limited) over the suit property in any manner. ..... pradeep sharma, stating therein that pradeep sharma neither had or has any right, title, possession or interest over the property in suit and he has no objection in the suit being decreed. ..... this is because the civil court is competent to decide the question of title as well as possession between the parties and the orders of the civil court would be binding on the magistrate.24. ..... it is only in cases where civil suit is for possession or for declaration of title in respect of the same property and where reliefs regarding protection of the property concerned can be applied for and granted by the civil court then proceedings under section 145 should not be allowed to continue. ..... 1 against the petitioner rameshwar havelia is for cancellation of the sale deed, and not for injunction or declaration of possession or title, therefore, the proceeding under section 145 cr.p.c. ..... 1 made a futile attempt by filing the suit for cancellation of the sale deed during the pendency of the criminal revision in which he also sought the reliefs for declaration of the title, possession as well as for injunction. ..... , even though the title of the property is yet to be decided by the civil court. .....

Assotech Super Tech (J.V.) Through Its Signatory Authority Chandra Kis ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2010)27VST433(NULL)

..... such applicants/prospective buyers have no right, title or interest in the dwelling units allotted to them till the transfer deed is executed in their favour. .....

Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammed Khan Vs. Metropole Hostels Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2010Utr7

..... (4) nothing in this section shall bar any person from suing to establish his title to such property and to recover possession thereof.8. ..... - (1) if any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit. .....

Daulat Ram (Deceased by L.Rs.) and anr. Vs. Gopal Krishna Balodi and o ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2010Utr9

..... the lower appellate court has further erred in law by holding that the plaintiffs' title is matured by virtue of adverse possession over the disputed land-there is neither any plea of adverse possession taken by any party nor is there any evidence of adverse possession. .....

Kanwar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... forgery - whoever makes any false documents or false electronic record or part of a document or electronic record, with intent to cause damage or injury to public or any person, or to support any claim or title, or to cause any person to part with property, or to enter into any express or implied contract, or with intent to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed, commits forgery.22. ..... moreover, by preparing the alleged false no objection/affidavit, petitioners never claimed any title over the property of the complainant nor caused any damage to the respondent no. 2. ..... as per definition of forgery if someone makes any false documents with intent to cause any damage to any person or to claim or title to part of property.24. .....

Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Ltd. Through Its C.M.D. Vs. Smt. J ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... 1 and 2) instituted the suit for declaration and injunction claiming title over certain land, acquired by the state government for construction of tehri dam. .....

Prashant Jaiswal and ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... affect any other enactment in which the repealed enactment has been applied, incorporated or referred to;and this act shall not affect the validity, invalidity, effect or consequences of anything already done or suffered, or any right, title, obligation or liability already acquired, accrued or incurred, or any remedy or proceedings in respect thereof, or any release or discharge of or from any debt, penalty, obligation, liability, claim or demand, or any indemnity already granted, or the proof of any past ..... respectively may have been in any manner affirmed or recognised or derived by, in or from any enactment hereby repealed;nor shall the repeal by this act of any enactment revive or restore any jurisdiction, office, custom, liability, right, title, privilege, restriction, exemption, usage, practice, procedure or other matter or thing not now existing or in force.7. ..... short title. .....

Rajeev Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... holding an independent substantive public office, or franchise, or liberty, is called upon to show by what right he holds the said office, franchise or liberty; if the inquiry leads to the finding that the holder of the office has no valid title to it, the issue of the writ of quo warranto ousts him from that office. .....

Telecommunication Consultants India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercia ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2010)29VST265(NULL)

..... - a sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of inter-state trade or commerce if the sale or purchase-(a) occasions the movement of goods from one state to another; or(b) is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods during their movement from one state to another.it was pointed out by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, that section 3 (extracted herein above), in fact, defines the term 'inter-state .....

Upendra Singh Maniyari Vs. Jagmohan Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... . a fourth aspect of the matter also deserves express notice, namely, section c of chapter viii of the rules of court, 1952' has been given the heading/title 'civil jurisdiction of the court', undoubtedly the rules incorporated thereunder, including rule 5 on the subject of 'special appeal' could not be deemed to extend to ..... or consequential to the main part of the order.thus, the determining factor is the real nature of the principal order passed by the single judge which is appealed against and neither the mentioning in the cause title of the application of both the articles nor the granting of ancillary orders thereupon made by learned single judge would be relevant ..... fifthly, it deserves to be noticed that section d of chapter viii of the 'rules of court, 1952' has been given the heading/title 'criminal jurisdiction of the court', but then, no provision for an intra-court appeal has been made under section d of chapter ..... . 520 of 1989, decided on 27.01.1989), wherein the apex court held as under:even when in the cause title of an application both article 226 and article 227 of the constitution have been mentioned, the learned single judge is at liberty to decide, according to facts of each particular case, whether the said application ought to ..... . in the event in passing his judgment on an application which had mentioned in its cause title both articles 226 and 227, the single judge has in fact invoked only his supervisory powers under article 227, the appeal under clause 15 .....