Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the utkal university act 1966 Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 298 results (0.128 seconds)

Brij Kishore Arora Vs. the Administrator, U.T. Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1993)105PLR340

..... in vice chancellor utkal university's case (supra), it was observed as under:-'the reason for the stricter rule laid down in the cases cited before us is that though an incorporated body like an university is a legal entity it has neither a living mind nor voice. ..... of any co-operative society persistently makes default or is negligent in the performance of the duties imposed on it by this act or the rules or the bye-laws or commits any act which is prejudicial to the interest of the society or its members, the registrar may, after giving the committee an opportunity to state its objections, if any, by order in writing, remove the committee; and (a) order fresh election of the committee or (b) appoint one or more administrators who need not be members of the society, to manage the affairs of the society for a period not exceeding one year specified ..... 5 the chandigarh state cooperative bank limited, chandigarh, is a co-operative society registered under the punjab cooperative societies act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the act') as amended by the punjab legislature upto november 1, 1966. .....

Union of India and ors. Vs. P.C. Bahl and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1969P& H161

..... . in that case the medical students of utkal university of orissa has prayed for a writ of mandamus under article 226 of the constitution of india against the vice-chancellor of the university and certain other persons connected with it in the high court of orissa ..... . (6) the list prepared in accordance with regulation 5 shall then be forwarded to the commission by the state government along with- (i) the records of all members of the state civil service included in the list: (ii) the records of all members of the state civil service who are proposed to be superseded by the recommendations made in the list; (iii) the reasons as recorded by the committee for the proposed supersession of any member of the state civil service; and (iv) the observations of the state government on the recommendations of the committee. 7(1) ..... . the high court had allowed the petition and grant the writ of mandamus , on the findings that the syndicate acted unreasonably and without due care and that on the facts there was no justification for the syndicate to pass such a drastic resolution and amplitude of the leakage f the paper in the examination ..... a reply thereto was received from the chief secretary to the government of punjab dated the 27th of april 1966, which informed respondent no. .....

Present: Mr. R.K. Sharma Advocate Vs. the Additional Secretary (Co-ope ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... in vice chancellor utkal university's case (supra).it was observed as under:- "the reason for the stricter rule laid down in the cases cited before us is that though an incorporated body like an university is a legal entity it has neither a living mind nor voice. ..... in view of above, i hereby set aside the impugned award and orders.since it is alleged that the petitioner is liable for not depositing the amount received from the defaulter member of the society in his loan account, it shall be open to the society to pass resolution and make an application to the competent authority with a prayer that dispute, if any, amongst the society, petitioner and the defaulter member of the co.operative society be referred to the arbitrator for decision in accordance with sections 55 and 56 of the act. ..... "the judgment of the high court is much to the same effect and it was held that cooperative society being a body corporate having succession and a common seal as envisaged under section 30 of the act, is to act by passing a resolution authorising its chairman or officers to act on its kumar virender 2014.07.22 16:01 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp nos.1843, 2670 to 2673 & 3162 to 3169 of 2000 12 behalf and in the absence of any such resolution, no valid authority can be conferred on any person to do so. .....

Haryana Financial Corporation Limited and ors. Vs. Kabis Shines Privat ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2002P& H142

..... in vice chancellor, utkal university v. s. k. ..... section 9 of the act says that the general superintendence, direction and management of the affairs and business of the financial corporation shall vest in the board of directors which, with the assistance of an executive committee and a managing director may exercise all the powers and discharge all the functions which may be exercised or discharged by the financial corporation. ..... the corporation no doubt has to act within the four corners of the act and in furtherance of the object underlying the act. ..... suffice it to say, the decision of the haryana financial corporation to take possession of the unit and to put it to sale under section 29 of the act cannot be said to be arbitrary as this decision was taken when the plaintiff had failed to pay the loan amount although rescheduling was done. ..... it was submitted that the management of the financial corporation vests in the board of directors which acts with the assistance of the executive committee and the managing director. ..... when the plaintiff failed to make the payment, order was passed by the haryana financial corporation under section 29 of the state financial corporations act, 1951 (in short the act) that possession of its industrial unit be taken and it be put to sale. .....

Panjab University Through Its Registrar Vs. Satinder Parkash Srivastav ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)141PLR241

..... it was held that section 21 of the punjab university act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') authorises the registrar to represent the university in court, in cases in which the university through lawfully passed resolution of the senate decided to sue or to file an appeal. ..... during the pendency of the appeals, both the respondents moved separate applications for dismissal of the appeals on the ground that the appeals preferred by the university through its registrar without a resolution passed by the senate authorising the registrar to file those appeals were not maintainable as the registrar of the university was not competent to file the appeal without any specific resolution having been passed by the senate. ..... learned counsel submits that in view of the aforesaid factual position and the law laid down by the hon'ble apex court, the judgments and decrees passed by the first appellate court dismissing the appeals of the university on the aforesaid ground, are liable to be set aside and the matter should be remanded to the first appellate court for its decision on merits.7. ..... 1305 of 1996 has arisen from civil suit filed by respondent-satinder parkash srivastava against the university through its registrar challenging the order of termination of his service dated 7.2.1966 and seeking some other reliefs regarding the disbursement of his pay etc. .....

Dayanand Anglo-vedic College Managing Committee New Delhi and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1972P& H170

..... the learned counsel for the petitioner has mainly argued that section 72 of the punjab reorganization act, 1966, bars the jurisdiction of the punjab legislature to pass any law in respect of the punjab university and, therefore, section 5(3) of the guru nanak university, amritsar, act in so far as it provides for the disaffiliation of the colleges situate in the districts of gurdaspur, amritsar. ..... i would hold that:--(i) section 72 of the 1966 act has not effectuated any amendment of any part of article 245, article 246, or the state list; (ii) section 72 of the act is not capable of being construed in such a manner as to indicate that parliament has thereby taken over the power of punjab state legislature under entry 11 of the state list in respect of the punjab university; (iii) section 5(3) of the 1969 act is a law in respect of the punjab university within the meaning of the relevant expression used in section 72; and (iv) section 5(3) of the 1969 act is not void for want of territorial ..... the learned counsel for the petitioner very vehemently argued that the object of the parliament in enacting section 72 of the punjab re-organization act was to keep the punjab university intact as it existed prior to november 1, 1966, as it was intended that no successor state should be able to deprive it of its operation and function in the areas of which it was functioning prior thereto. .....

Dr. Naginder Singh Vs. the Punjab University, Chandigarh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1990P& H157

..... 13 of the punjab university act, 1947 (for short, the act) in so far as it 'gives an arbitrary, unguided and uncanalised power to the chancellor, respondent 2, to nominate 'members on the senate, is ultra vires the consititu-tion and the basic structure on which it is founded. ..... from amongst themselves, among whom three shall be elected to represent the districts of ferozepur, hoshiarpur and ludhiana in the state of punjab, four to'represent the state of haryana and one to-represent the.union territory of chandigarh; (g) omitted by government of india notification dated 6-12-1989; (h) six shall be elected by the various faculties of the university; (i) two shall be elcted by the members of the punjab legislative assembly from amongst themselves, and two shall be elected by the members of the haryana legislative assembly from amongst themselves, provided that ..... but with effect from november 1, 1966, the day of trifurcation, the chancellor traditionally now is the vice president of india, by name. .....

Ramesh Birch and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1988P& H281

..... in exercise of the powers under section 1(2), the pondicherry government issued a notification dated march 1, 1966, bringing into force the madras act as extended by the act to pondicherry with effect from april 1, 1966, but in the meantime, the madras legislature had amended the madras act and consequently it was the madras act, as amended up to april l, 1966 which was brought into force under the said notification. ..... section 87 of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966, authorises the central government to extend to the union territory of chandigarh only such enactments as were in existence on the date (1-11-1966) on which the act was enforced. ..... in exercise of its powers under section 87 of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966, extended the same to the union territory of chandigarh. 2. ..... 22 of the karnataka excise act, 1966. ..... 1, 1966, enforcing the act in the whole or any part of the territories now comprised in the union territory of chandigarh, by declaring the same as urban area under s. ..... both the east punjab urban rent restriction act (punjab act 2 of 1985) and the indian stamp (punjab amendment) act, 1981, were enacted much after november 1, 1966. ..... 31 of 1966) have extended to the union territory of chandigarh the east punjab urban rent restriction (amendment) act. .....

Man Mohan Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1973P& H227

..... awasthy lastly submitted that the very object of the formation of the punjabi university and the guru nanak university, as disclosed in section 4(1) of the respective statues, constituting them (the punjabi university act, 35 of 1961, and the guru nanak university amritsar act, 21 of 1969) is to make provision for imparting education and for promoting research in the humanities, learned professions, sciences, etc. ..... state of haryana, is irrelevant as all that was held in that case was that it is not for the high court to go into matters like recognising or not recognising the equivalent degrees or examinations of other universities by the syndicate of a particular university, as the syndicate of the university is the best body to determine whether in certain circumstances a particular examination in another university or board is to be recognised as equivalent or not. ..... introduced a classification between one class of advocates and the rest of the advocates was struck down as irrational, inasmuch as it was found that there was no nexus between the basis of the said classification and the object intended to be achieved by the relevant scheme of the rules framed by the governor of andhra pradesh under article 234 and proviso to article 309 of the constitution, providing, inter alia, the impugned special qualification of actual practice as an advocate in the andhra pradesh high court as distinguished from such practice ..... from the data available he found that in 1966, the b. .....

Hardwari Lal Vs. G.D. Tapase and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1982P& H439

..... shri brar, the chancellor of the university wrote to the petitioner a formal letter fervently offering him the appointment along with the advice that the petitioner might resign his seat in the state assembly in order to give all his time to the university and, (b) the petitioner formally accepted the appointment on the explicit conditions which he had previously mentioned verbally and to which shri brar, in his statutory capacity of the chanceller of the university and by virtue of his statutory powers under statute 4(6) and statute 26 of the 1st statutes of the university, an integral part of the university's act, ..... . but ultimately the andhra pradesh legislature passed the osmania university (amendment) act, 1966 (act ii of 1966), amending the osmania university act of 1959 in certain particulars ..... . as the amendment introduced, adversely affected the appellant, he filed a writ petition praying for the issue of a writ or order declaring section 5 of the osmania university (second amendment) act, 1966, which introduced section 13-a in the original act, as unconstitutional and void ..... . the osmania university act was again amended by the osmania university (second amendment) act, 1966 .....