Court : US Supreme Court
..... -neutral rationales for striking african-americans-ambivalence about the death penalty, hesitancy to vote to execute defendants capable of being rehabilitated, and the jurors' own family history of criminality-pertained just as well to some white jurors who were not challenged and who did serve on the jury; by the evidence of the state's use of racially disparate questioning; and by the state courts' failure to consider the evidence as to the prosecution's use of the jury shuffle and the historical evidence of racial discrimination by the dallas county district attorney's office. ..... the procedures and standards applicable in the case are controlled by the habeas corpus statute codified at title 28, chapter 153, of the united states code, most recently amended in a substantial manner by the antiterrorism and effective death penalty act of 1996 (aedpa). ..... a dallas county district judge testified that, when he had served in the district attorney's office from the late-1950's to early-1960's, his superior warned him that he would be fired if he permitted any african-americans to serve on a jury. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... making such amendment and the date of operation of such amendment;" post the amendment, clause (g) of section 56(2) of the development act reads as under: (g) the form and manner in which notice under sub- section (3) of section 11a shall be published;4.6 the central government in exercise of power under sub-section (1) of section 56, read with clauses (e), (g) and (r) of sub-section (2) to section 56, has enacted the delhi development (master plan and zonal development plan) rules, 1959, (the development rules ) which came into force on 1st january, 1960.development rules, in terms of rule 3, require the ..... authority to carry out a civic survey .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... and investigations of the device s safety and effectiveness that have been published or should reasonably be known to the applicant; a full statement of the device s components, ingredients, and properties and of the principle or principles of operation ; a full description of the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, processing, and, when relevant, packing and installation of, such device ; samples or device components required by the fda; and a specimen of the ..... the drug amendments of 1962 reiterated congress intent not to preempt claims relying on state law: nothing in the amendments shall be construed as invalidating any provision of state law which would be valid in the absence of such amendments unless there is a direct and positive conflict between such amendments and ..... general, a device is assigned to class iii if it cannot be established that a less stringent classification would provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness, and the device is purported or represented to be for a use in supporting or sustaining human life or for a use which is of substantial ..... the question presented in that case is: whether the prescription drug labeling judgments imposed on manufacturers by the food and drug administration ( fda ) pursuant to fda s comprehensive safety and efficacy authority under the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act ..... the regulatory landscape changed in the 1960 s and 1970 s, as complex devices proliferated and ..... 1960 .....
Tag this Judgment!