Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the tamil nadu compulsory elementary education act 1994 Page 8 of about 953 results (0.323 seconds)

Kesu Ram Vs. Zila Parishad

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj1323; 2003(3)WLC53

..... with the commencement of rajasthan panchayati raj act 1994 under new constitutional scheme, the rajasthan panchayat samiti and zila parishad act alongwith rajasthan panchayat act, 1953 and rules framed thereunder stood repealed. ..... learned counsel for the respondents has on the other side urged that the learned single judge was right in dismissing the writ petition filed by the petitioner because the circular relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant before the learned single judge had been issued under the rajasthan panchayat samiti and zila praishad service rules, 1959 which were framed under the panchayat samiti & zila parishad act of 1959. ..... governing the selection and recruitment to any post under the panchayati raj institution was occupied field of the act of 1994 and rules of 1996 framed thereunder. ..... it related to the different examination, different set of rules and on the interpretation of rules governing the permission granted by the board of secondary education to any student for improving his marks or class in the same examination. ..... as against this in 1997 the petitioner appeared only at three compulsory subjects viz hindi, english, general science and two optionals viz social science and mathematics with 100 marks each and sanskrit as third language with 50 marks. ..... science (50 marks) and elementary maths (50 marks) with three optionals viz economics, civics and history (150 marks each). .....

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Peoples Union for Civil Liberties, Kerala ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC573; 2009(10)SCALE25; (2009)8SCC46

..... most of the tribal children have elementary education. ..... was no reason as to why the original land would not be restored to them ..... even the union of india having supported the case of the tribals, there is no reason as to why this court should interfere with the impugned judgment.v) the 1999 act being not a validating statute, the impugned judgment is unassailable, particularly having regard to the objective of 1975 act vis-a-vis 1999 act.vi) it is incorrect to contend that the state before enactment of 1999 act consulted the true representatives of the tribals.vii) in any view of the matter as the members of the tribal community became entitled to restoration of their land by reason of the provisions of the 1975 act, there ..... union of india 1994 (2) klt 25 also upheld the provisions of section 1(3) of 1975 act stating the said provision to be conditional legislation and not a delegated legislation.62 ..... in the schools and colleges of kerala, malayalam, tamil or english is taught .....

Prakash Rewadmal Gupta Vs. Lonavala Municipal Council and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR993; 2002(2)BomCR484

..... since the state could not impart education by itself, it has recognised private institutions which would discharge that obligation and these institutions were governed in the state of tamil nadu from which the appeal originated by the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) act, 1973 ..... where the land is designated in a plan as subject to compulsory acquisition or where the development permission has been refused as in the present case, it is well open to the land owner to apply to the state government for a direction to the appropriate authority to purchase it in accordance with the provisions of the act. ..... the planning authority is to revise the development plan twenty years after it has come into operation (the period was 10 years prior to amending act 39 of 1994 ..... this court accepted the aforesaid contention and, while dealing with the objection of the petitioner that the fresh reservation in the revised development plan was mala fide, the court held as follows :'it was urged that the lands were reserved for a public purpose with effect from year 1966 and no steps were taken to acquire the same and it would be unjust and unfair to the petitioners that the government should be permitted to acquire the lands in year 1994. ..... , on 26th august, 1994 a notification under section 6 of the land acquisition act, 1894 as required under sub-section (2) of section 126 of the m.r.t.p. ..... of 1989, decided on 15th september, 1994, throws light on the issue which arises in the present case. .....

Panchamal Cashew Industries Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2002]126STC351(Kar)

..... state of tamil nadu [1981] 48 stc 332 (sc), it was observed that in order to constitute an inter-state sale as defined in section 3(a) of the act, two, factors should co-exist (i) a sale of goods and (ii) movement of goods from one state to another under the contract of sale. ..... [1992] 86 stc 235, andhra pradesh high court held that the appropriation of goods against a particular contract takes place only at the depot, when the invoice is raised after receipt of the payment as the goods moved from factory in one state and depot in other state in truck loads at frequent intervals and the goods were unloaded in the depot and entered into stock register.in state of tamil nadu v. ..... ), it was held that in the absence of evidence with regard to the very nature of contract contemplating the movement of goods from one state to other, it cannot be said that the movement occasioned by the transaction of sale.in state of tamil nadu v. ..... state of tamil nadu [1994] 92 stc 325 (mad. ..... [1994] 95 stc 39, madras high court held that there is no material on record to support the claim of the assessing authority in treating the stock transfers as inter-state sales, whereas it is only the assumption. ..... 302 to 401 of 1993 and 116 of 1994, karnataka high court held that the decisions of the punjab and haryana high court in [1990] 77 stc 211 (haryana iron and steel rolling mills v. .....

M. Ranka Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Secretary to the G ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1994)2MLJ281

..... by virtue of the power conferred by the aforesaid act, the president enacted tamil nadu official language (amendment) act, 1976 (41 of 1976)(hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), amending the provisions of the tamil nadu official language act, 1956. ..... 9, law, dated 18th january, 1982 appointing the 1st day of february, 1982 as the date on which the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 4-b of the tamil nadu official language act shall come into force in respect of (1) civil courts subordinate to the high court; (ii) tribunals and (iii) rent courts and revenue courts. ..... kanpur : air1982all398 , it is held that there is nothing in the constitution laying down that any one has a fundamental right to be taught in any particular language where he is admitted and that no student getting education in an institution run under a central act can force the institution to impart education to him in hindi in doonagari script.33. ..... it is elementary that the state comprises of three organs, the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. ..... ultimately, the petitioner filed a memo on 15.4.1994 stating that he does not insist upon any further hearing in the case and the bench may consider the material on record and pronounce judgment.4. ii. ..... the counsel for the respondents concluded their arguments on 11.1.1994 and the matter was adjourned to 1.2.1994 for the reply of the petitioner in w.p. no. .....

The Unemployed Secondary Grade Teachers Welfare Association Vs. the St ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)6MLJ224

..... while considering the invalidity of such procedure or practice on the anvil of articles 14, 16(2) and 19(1) of the constitution, though the learned single judge found some substance in the submission yet, repelled the same by observing that the validity of the impugned orders, which had been issued in accordance with rules 3 and 9 of the special rules for the tamil nadu elementary educational subordinate service and rule 10(a) of the tamil nadu state and subordinate service rules , could not be tested without specific challenge to the validity of the rules.6.1 the decision of the division bench of this court reported in 1982 ..... a parliamentary law as envisaged under article 16(3) and article 33 of the constitution and since the learned single judge has placed so much reliance on the provisions of the employment exchanges (compulsory notification of vacancies) act and the rules thereunder to justify such obnoxious discrimination between a citizen of the very same state as compared to another citizen of the very same state, we now travail to consider the submissions made on that score.22.the employment exchanges (compulsory notification of vacancies) act is a central act enacted by the parliament to provide for the compulsory notification of vacancies to employment exchanges. .....

R. Thiyagarajan Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Secreta ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... based on the above letter, the petitioners agreed for the disposal of the writ petition giving up their challenge to the rule 5 of the tamil nadu higher secondary education service rules issued in notification no.3 dated 19.08.2006. ..... the said qualification was relaxed with respect to the fourth respondent and two others, by virtue of the government letter dated 12.07.2010, after the fourth respondent had challenged rule 5 of the tamil nadu higher secondary education service rules, issued in notification no.3, dated 19.08.2006. ..... therefore, the conditions prescribing five years teaching experience as lecturer in directorate of teacher's education, research and training (dtert) / district institute of education and training (diet) in the state of tamil nadu / recognised teacher training institute (tti) mentioned in clause 4(b)(3) of the said advertisement of the second respondent should not have been relaxed by the third respondent to accommodate the fourth respondent. 14. ..... in that case, the learned judge has held that neither the act nor the rules contain any provision conferring power on the government or any of the authorities to relax any of the provisions of the act or of the rules. ..... the learned counsel for the petitioner also relied on the judgment of this court in sundaram aided elementary school, kodiakkadu vs. ..... dr.narinder mohan and others [1994 (2)scc 630] and para 10 of the judgment is extracted hereunder: 10. .....

S.Rm.M.Ct.M. Thiruppani Trust Rep. by Its Trustee, M.Ct. Pethachi Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(1)CTC695

..... contended that the definition of charitable purpose given in section 2(15) of the income tax act, 1961 has been incorporated in sub-section (2) of section 20 of the tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1978, with the omission of the word, 'education' and contended that the interpretation given to the said definition 'not involving the carrying on any activity of profit' given in clause 2(15) of the income tax act, 1961 should be applied to interpretation of sub-section (2) of section 20 of the tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1978 as both the definitions in the respective acts are ..... it is stated there; '3.74 considering the constitutional imperative regarding the universalization of elementary education it was to be expected that the share of this sector would be ..... pradesh, : [1993]1scr594 wherein the supreme court referred to the directive principles of state policy given under article 45 of the constitution of india, which says :'the state shall endeavour to provide, within a period of ten years from the commencement of this constitution, for free and compulsory education for all children until they complete the age of fourteen years ..... this connection, learned counsel referred to administrative law by sir william wade-seventh edition, 1994 at page 400 wherein the learned author under the heading 'abuse of discretion' has stated as follows:this has become the most frequently cited passage (though most commonly cited only by its nickname) in .....

S. Pandara Vadivu Vs. the Director of Elementary Education,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ1000

..... the third respondent school being a private aided school as defined in section 2(7) of the act, granting recognition under section 11 of the act and being administed by the school committee formed under section 15 of the act, is bound to follow the tamil nadu recognised private school (regulation) rules, 1974, in the matter of appointment of headmaster and teaching staff also ..... admittedly the third respondent school is a recognised private aided non-minority school and therefore the provisions of the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) act, 1973, and the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) rules, 1974, are applicable to it ..... but, the petitioner could not obtain necessary orders of exemption from the government and hence her appointment was also not approved and consequently by proceeding dated 19.12.2000, the petitioner was relieved from the post as per the direction issued by the assistant elementary educational officer, udankudi, by his proceedings dated 12.12.2000 ..... whether an outsider can be appointed as a teacher when teachers working in the lower cadre are available in the school in violation of rule 15(4) of the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) rules, 1974, was considered by another division bench of this court in the judgment reported in : (2005)1mlj233 (the secretary, saliar mahajana higher secondary schools v. ..... 13914 of 1992 and the writ petition was dismissed on 13.4.1994, which was affirmed by the division bench in w.a. no .....

S. Pappa and ors. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1999)3MLJ347

..... education (m) department, dated 12.11.1990 is valid as it creates a new post, namely, secondary grade (junior) teacher which is not in the cadre both under the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) rules, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the ..... court or other authority,(i) no private school shall, only on the ground of having been granted recognition underthis act, be entitled to any grant or other financial assistance from the government;(ii) the government may, subject to,(a) the availability of funds;(b) the norms and conditions specified in the grant-in-aid code of tamil nadu education department;(c) the condition that every private school receiving any grant or financial assistance, from the government levies and collects from the pupils only such fee, charge or other payment as may be ..... 8.6.1994 and such government order is the law, it is binding upon the university and as such, the university cannot afford to disobey it and cannot refuse to give one seat for sports quota, and the petitioner being the only candidate coming for admission under the sports quota, he is entitled to be admitted to the m.b.a ..... the first petitioner in that writ petition, who is a secondary grade teacher, was appointed as secondary grade teacher on 20.4.1990 as approved by the district educational officer in his letter dated 26.5.1990 and is working in sivanthi vinayakar elementary .....