Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... such a situation where there - 9 - crp no.100095 of 2021 is more than one prayer made in a plaint, the question as to whether under such circumstances by invoking the provisions contained under order vii rule 11 of the code, whether the court could reject the plaint as a whole or whether a portion of the pleading or prayer could be stuck down under the rule fell for consideration at the hands of the hon ble supreme court in the case of roop lal sathi vs. ..... held that even in proceeding on the basis that the consideration of re.1/- is shown in the deed of partition is no consideration in the eye of law, the question remains is as to whether a partition deed would be violative of section 25 of the contract act for want of consideration. ..... in the case before the bombay high court, it was noticed that on the basis of the averments of the plaintiff it was found that the plaintiff pleaded that the conveyance dated 18.08.1989 is void and barred or void ab initio and that on the basis of such conveyance the plaintiffs were never divested of their title to the property, which continue to vest ..... it was noticed that in balasaria construction (supra), the hon ble supreme court noticed the conflict of opinion on the issue whether the plaint - 10 - crp no.100095 of 2021 can be rejected under order vii rule 11(d) cpc on the ground that it is hit by law of limitation and in view of the importance of the issue, made a reference to a bench of three hon ..... debts recovery appellate tribunal (1998) 2 .....
Tag this Judgment!