Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the societies registration act 1860 Court: jharkhand Page 8 of about 367 results (0.043 seconds)

Bihar State Cooperative Milk Producers' Federation Ltd. Vs. State of J ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2003(2)BLJR1467; [2003(3)JCR302(Jhr)]

..... posed multi-state co- operative society' is required to be made under section 5 of multi-state co-operative societies act, 1984, no such registration is required for an existing registered co-operative society, which is deemed to be a multi-state cooperative society from the date of re-organisation under section 95(1) of the multi-state co-operative societies act, 1984. ..... 7 and 95(1) of the multi-state co-operative societies act, 1984, it will be evident that the sections 5 and 7 of multi- state co-operative societies act, 1984 relates to 'a proposed multi-state co-operative society' whereas section 95(1) relates to 'an existing registered co-operative society', which on or from the date of re-organization, shall be deemed to be a multi- state co-operative society registered under the corresponding provisions of multi-state co-operative societies act, 1984 and the bye-laws of such society shall continue to be in force until altered or rescinded, if otherwise not inconsistent with the provisions of the act.thereby, while registration of a 'pro .....

Sikndra Nawaz Khan Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... making registration of information relating to commission of a cognizable offence mandatory would help the society, especially, the poor in rural and remote areas of the country ..... non-registration of such a large number of firs leads to a definite lawlessness in the society.105 ..... reading section 154 in any other form would not only be detrimental to the scheme of the code but also to the society as a whole. ..... submission has been advanced that if the petitioner had any grievance with respect to non-registration of the fir, the petitioner can very well approach the competent court by filing a complaint petition and if the same is sent to the police under section 156(3) of ..... thus a plain reading reading of the judicial pronouncement as quoted above would reveal that at the stage of the registration of the fir, information has only to be seen as to whether it discloses any -6- cognizable offence ..... thus seen that this court has repeatedly held in various decided cases that registration of fir is mandatory if the information given to the police under section 154 of the code discloses the commission of a cognizable offence.115. ..... in view of various counterclaims regarding registration or non-registration, what is necessary is only that the information given to the police must disclose the commission of a cognizable offence. ..... the police is required to maintain several records including case diary as provided under section 172 of the code, general diary as provided under section 44 of the police act .....

Hare Ram Singh Etc. Vs. Bihar State Co-operative Milk Producers Federa ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR13(Jhr)]

..... according to the federation, after re-organisation, the federation has become multi state cooperative society and the government has no control; on the other hand, it is the claim of the state of jharkhand that it is under the control of the government.ultimately, the division bench, by the order dated 26.6.2003, held in favour of the comfed, the federation, to the effect that comfed shall be deemed to be a multi state co-operative society under sub-section (1) of section 95 of multi state co-operative societies act, 1984, since the date of re-organisation of state of bihar, i.e ..... it is true that some nominees of the state government are members of the board of directors but there is no direct control of the state government over the affairs of the apex co-oprative society and nothing is there in the bye-laws to show that the state government provides necessary funds for the business of the federation, nor there is anything to indicate that there is control of the state government over day to day functioning of the respondent federation, which (control over day to day functioning) is the responsibility of the general body, which, as indicated ..... the first meeting of the members after registration shall have the same powers as are given to the annual general meeting.as per this provision, the supreme authority of the federation shall vest in the general body ..... milk unions who have signed the bye-laws and the application of registration will be considered enrolled as ordinary members .....

Hare Ram Singh and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. the Bihar State Co-operative Mil ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR595; AIR2008Jhar86(FB)

..... according to the federation, after reorganization, the federation has become multi state co-operative society and the government has no control; on the other hand, it is the claim of the state of jharkhand that it is under the control of the government.ultimately, the division bench, by the order dated 26.6.2003, held in favour of the comfed, the federation, to the effect that comfed shall be deemed to be a multi state co-operative society under sub-section (1) of section 95 of multi state co-operative societies act, 1984, since the date of re-organization of state of bihar, i.e. ..... milk unions who have signed the bye-laws and the application of registration will be considered enrolled as ordinary members.5.1.5. ..... the first meeting of the members after registration shall have the same powers as are given to the annual general meeting. ..... (7) it is true that some nominees of the state government are members of the board of directors but there is no direct control of the state government over the affairs of the apex co-operative society and nothing is there in the bye-laws to show that the state government provides necessary funds for the business of the federation, nor there is anything to indicate that there is control of the state government over day to day functioning of the respondent federation, which (control over day to day functioning) is the responsibility of the general body, which, as indicated .....

Kunal Anand Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required to be registered compulsorily however, the development agreements executed between the allottees and the jharkhand state housing board are unregistered, 51 which indicates the hasty action of the board. mr. ..... the state government was directed to cause fresh valuation through an independent government valuer and difference in value was to be paid by the society to sidco.92. ..... keeping in view the fact that some of the members may have build their houses on the site allotted to them, the hon'ble supreme court gave liberty to the appellant society to negotiate with the respondents for purchase of 65 their land at the prevailing market price. 93. ..... (2007) 4 scc 635, in a public interest litigation, the high court found that undue favour has been shown to the cooperative societies and therefore, the high court took recourse to drastic measure such as, forfeiture along with cancellation of allotment. ..... reported in (2012) 3 scc 727, no housing scheme was framed by bangalore city cooperative housing society limited nor it was shown that it had framed a housing scheme which was approved by the state government. ..... housing society ltd. vs. ..... has referred to decision in srinivasa cooperative house building society ltd. vs. .....

M/S Kamla Aditya Construction Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required to be registered compulsorily however, the development agreements executed between the allottees and the jharkhand state housing board are unregistered, 51 which indicates the hasty action of the board. mr. ..... the state government was directed to cause fresh valuation through an independent government valuer and difference in value was to be paid by the society to sidco.92. ..... keeping in view the fact that some of the members may have build their houses on the site allotted to them, the hon'ble supreme court gave liberty to the appellant society to negotiate with the respondents for purchase of 65 their land at the prevailing market price. 93. ..... (2007) 4 scc 635, in a public interest litigation, the high court found that undue favour has been shown to the cooperative societies and therefore, the high court took recourse to drastic measure such as, forfeiture along with cancellation of allotment. ..... reported in (2012) 3 scc 727, no housing scheme was framed by bangalore city cooperative housing society limited nor it was shown that it had framed a housing scheme which was approved by the state government. ..... housing society ltd. vs. ..... has referred to decision in srinivasa cooperative house building society ltd. vs. .....

Simplex Infrastructures Limite Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required to be registered compulsorily however, the development agreements executed between the allottees and the jharkhand state housing board are unregistered, 51 which indicates the hasty action of the board. mr. ..... the state government was directed to cause fresh valuation through an independent government valuer and difference in value was to be paid by the society to sidco.92. ..... keeping in view the fact that some of the members may have build their houses on the site allotted to them, the hon'ble supreme court gave liberty to the appellant society to negotiate with the respondents for purchase of 65 their land at the prevailing market price. 93. ..... (2007) 4 scc 635, in a public interest litigation, the high court found that undue favour has been shown to the cooperative societies and therefore, the high court took recourse to drastic measure such as, forfeiture along with cancellation of allotment. ..... reported in (2012) 3 scc 727, no housing scheme was framed by bangalore city cooperative housing society limited nor it was shown that it had framed a housing scheme which was approved by the state government. ..... housing society ltd. vs. ..... has referred to decision in srinivasa cooperative house building society ltd. vs. .....

Excel Venture Construction Co. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required to be registered compulsorily however, the development agreements executed between the allottees and the jharkhand state housing board are unregistered, 51 which indicates the hasty action of the board. mr. ..... the state government was directed to cause fresh valuation through an independent government valuer and difference in value was to be paid by the society to sidco.92. ..... keeping in view the fact that some of the members may have build their houses on the site allotted to them, the hon'ble supreme court gave liberty to the appellant society to negotiate with the respondents for purchase of 65 their land at the prevailing market price. 93. ..... (2007) 4 scc 635, in a public interest litigation, the high court found that undue favour has been shown to the cooperative societies and therefore, the high court took recourse to drastic measure such as, forfeiture along with cancellation of allotment. ..... reported in (2012) 3 scc 727, no housing scheme was framed by bangalore city cooperative housing society limited nor it was shown that it had framed a housing scheme which was approved by the state government. ..... housing society ltd. vs. ..... has referred to decision in srinivasa cooperative house building society ltd. vs. .....

Modi Projects Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... referring to section 53a of the transfer of property act and section 17 of the registration act, the learned additional advocate general has submitted that after 2001, all agreements whereby an immovable property is transferred, is required to be registered compulsorily however, the development agreements executed between the allottees and the jharkhand state housing board are unregistered, 51 which indicates the hasty action of the board. mr. ..... the state government was directed to cause fresh valuation through an independent government valuer and difference in value was to be paid by the society to sidco.92. ..... keeping in view the fact that some of the members may have build their houses on the site allotted to them, the hon'ble supreme court gave liberty to the appellant society to negotiate with the respondents for purchase of 65 their land at the prevailing market price. 93. ..... (2007) 4 scc 635, in a public interest litigation, the high court found that undue favour has been shown to the cooperative societies and therefore, the high court took recourse to drastic measure such as, forfeiture along with cancellation of allotment. ..... reported in (2012) 3 scc 727, no housing scheme was framed by bangalore city cooperative housing society limited nor it was shown that it had framed a housing scheme which was approved by the state government. ..... housing society ltd. vs. ..... has referred to decision in srinivasa cooperative house building society ltd. vs. .....

Dhiren Rawani Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... it was further submitted that the petitioner's company rainbow multi state credit co-operative society operates under multistate credit cooperative societies act, 2002 and multi state cooperative societies, rules 2002 for which certificate of registration has been duly obtained by the said society and accordingly bye-laws have been framed. ..... both the parties and going through the allegations and also from perusal of case diary and the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of opposite parties, it appears that the petitioner is a multi state credit co- operative society ltd and registered under multistate credit cooperative societies act, 2002 and multi state cooperative societies, rules 2002 and he has collected huge amount of money from the customers and diverted the same for purchase of land which is not permissible under the provisions of the aforesaid act. ..... no.2 and 3 by one deputy director (co-operation) department of agriculture, co-operation & farmers welfare, ministry of agriculture and farmers welfare, new delhi on 28.04.2017 in which at para-8 it has been categorically stated that complaints have been received in the ministry against the society directly as well as through rbi, mumbai, rbi, kolkata and rbi, 3 bihar etc. ..... it is further alleged that the aforesaid companies are not registered as non-banking institution with any government or with any co-operative society act nor they have taken any permission from the reserve bank of india. .....