Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the shore nuisance bombay and kolaba act 1853 Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 5 results (0.056 seconds)

Dec 15 1995 (HC)

Kanhaiya Lal Vs. Hari Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1996Raj182

..... with regard to the question of nuisance and subletting as envisaged under section 13(1)(d) & (e) of the act, it was contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that perusal of the language used by the legislature would go to show that for the purpose of creating nuisance and sub-letting it is essential to prove and plead the ingredients of both, the nuisance as well as subletting both with regard to the time factor and the person who has created, alleged nuisance and the person to whom the premises were sub-let for a particular period and at the particular rate of rent which necessary ingredients are not only ..... laxmidas (supra) question which had arisen before the bombay high court in the context of what constitutes 'nuisance' and 'annoyance' under section 13(1)(c) of the bombay rants, hotel and lodging house rates control act, 1947 it was held by the high court that the terms 'nuisance and annoyance' are of wide amplitude covering variety of circumstances and cannot be fenced by any definite meaning.in noratmal v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 1963 (HC)

Krishna Kumar Vs. Krishna Gopal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1964Raj21

..... corrupt practice was committed at the election by the candidate or his election agent, and every such corrupt practice was committed contrary to the orders, and without the consent of the candidate or his election agent: (b) that all such corrupt practices were of a trivial and limited character or took the form of customary hospitality which did not affect the result of the election; (c) that the candidate and his election agent took all reasonable means for preventing the commission of corrupt practices at the election; and (d) that in all other ..... the election was to be declared void on account of this corrupt practice under section 100(2)(b) if the tribunal were of the opinion that it had been committed by a returned candidate, or his agent, or by any other person with the connivance of a returned candidate or his agent.after the amendment of the representation of the people act 1951 by act 27 of 1956 the distinction between major and the minor corrupt practices was removed. ..... the same view was taken by the allahabad, bombay and assam high courts in rustom satin v. dr. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2006 (HC)

Rafiq Ahmed and ors. Vs. Ramjani and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj3239

..... have considered the above argument and perused the documents and in my firm view the argument has no substance, inasmuch as the learned trial court has rightly dismissed the application filed under order 13 rule 2 cpc as the document sought to be produced had no relevance with the disputed property and therefore were not relevant for the just decision of the suit.18. ..... a/2 on 19.11.1955 to the municipal board, thereby lodging his complainant in respect of construction of spout and windows against chand khan having been raised by chand khan in the way, inasmuch as the said construction disturbed his privacy and created nuisance. ..... per contra, learned counsel for the plaintiff respondent has supported the findings arrived at by the learned trial court and argued that the trial court has decreed the suit on appreciation of evidence in true perspective and hence, the impugned judgment and decree call for no interference.10 ..... thus, the trial court has committed serious error in mis-interpreting the statements of the defendants' witnesses and has erred in drawing an erroneous inference from the statements to the effect that ramjani was the owners of the disputed property and that he constructed the suit premises ..... however, the documents were found in the documents of appellant's father chand khan only on 17.5.2006 and therefore, there was no deliberate or intentional act on the part of the appellant for not filing the same. ..... bombay and anr ..... air 1933 bombay 217; bepin behari dandapata and ors. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 14 1987 (HC)

Himmat Singh and ors. Vs. Bhagwana Ram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1988CriLJ614; 1987(1)WLN538

..... , answered:it is not the intent of law that the community as a whole or a large number of complaints come forward to lodge their complaint or protest against the nuisance; section 133 does not require any particular number of complainants...pollutions discharged from the 'chimney' knows no frontiers of localities and very often they lead to damage not only to the locality or the particular area where the pollution originates but also to the neighbouring localities and adjacent areas.greene, ..... requiring non-petitioners to remove the cattle fodder from the public ways and to remove their 'tals from the public way as well as the nuisance caused by operating the electric operated fodder-cutting machines and if they object to do so, to appear and show cause why the order should not be absolute ..... it will have to be determined on evidence whether the mill, even though run by an electric motor, produced such noise as effectively and substantially interfered with the health and physical comfort of the community....the mere fact that there was availability of other remedy under municipal acts or that municipal board had given license to carry on trade, does not deprive the magistrate of his jurisdiction under section 133 of the code air 1932 all 159 : 1932-33 cri lj 524; lalman ..... if an act is found to be injurious to the physical comfort of neighbour it must also then be held that it is injurious to the physical comfort of the community (see 1904 punj re 9 : 1904-1 cri lj 512, phiraya mal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2014 (HC)

Derawar Singh Vs. State (Home Affairs) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... upon consideration of the rival submissions and upon a closer perusal of the documents placed before this court and relevant rule 28 of the 1989 rules itself, this court is of the opinion that the respondent department has failed to appreciate the true letter and spirit of rule 28 and have also not properly appreciated the extraordinary works of courage and daring nature done by the petitioner on the basis of which the appropriate recommendations were made by the superintendent of police, jodhpur (rural). ..... 7/2014 16/28 the state governments are directed to constitute a state security commission in every state (in the manner detailed herein) to ensure that the state government does not exercise unwarranted influence or pressure on the state police and for laying down the broad policy guidelines so that the state police always acts according to the laws of the land and the constitution of the country. ..... he, therefore, submitted that there is no independent and proper application of mind on the part of director general of police himself and reading before this court, the details of recommendations made by the superintendent of police, jodhpur (rural), the learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the outstanding work done by the petitioner in the form of police work, like saving of six lives from a flooding river from a swayed truck, preventing communal riots, catching a dacoit known as rania, catching leader of the gold chain-snatchers' group, namely ..... it was formed in 1853. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //