Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the punjab preemption repeal act 1973 Court: delhi Page 4 of about 1,763 results (0.225 seconds)

Om Parkash Kapoor and anr. Vs. Special Addl. Director of Enforcement a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000(56)DRJ505; 2001(73)ECC50

..... appeal lies under section 54 of the 1973 act and has raised the following question of law:-(a) that there is no contravention of the provisions of section 5(1)(a), 5(1)(c) or section 23b of the 1947 act in as much as:- 1) the payments were made in indian currency and no foreign exchange was involved or paid and so it does not contravene the fera act as it deals with cases involving contravention of foreign exchange only;2) the foreign artists, though foreign nationals, were in india when they were engaged by the appellants and so resident in india. ..... the long title of which reads: 'an act consolidate and amend the law regulating certain payments, dealing in foreign exchange and securities, transactions indirectly affecting foreign exchange and the import and export of currencies and bullions for the conservation of the foreign exchange resources of the country and the proper utilisation thereof in the interest of the, economic development of the country'.the object of these enactments thus is to earn, conserve, regulate and store foreign exchange in the interest of the economic development of the ..... these two appeals under section 54 of the foreign exchange regulation act, 1973 (for short 'the fera 1973') arise out of the common judgment dated 1.7.1977 in criminal ..... 1973, the old act was repealed and replaced by the fera 1973 ..... of punjab, : 1970crilj750 .under section 23b, attempts to contravene any of the provisions of this act is punishable as if those provisions of the act were .....

Apeejay School Vs. Sh. Darbari Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the petitioner contended before the labour court that it was a recognized private unaided school within the meaning of the delhi school education act, 1973 (school act); that section 8(3) of the said act provides the remedy of appeal before the delhi school education tribunal (school tribunal) to any employee of the school against any order of dismissal, removal or reduction in rank; that in view of the existence of the specific remedy provided in the school act, the labour court had no jurisdiction to entertain the ..... : air 2003 sc 4493 where in relation to the delhi rent act, 1995, the supreme court held that when the legislature itself had vested the power in the central government to notify the date from which the act would come into force, then, the central government is entitled to take into consideration various facts while considering when the act should be brought into force or not and no mandamus can be issued to the central government to issue the notification bringing the act into force. ..... punjab national bank : air 1991 sc 855 the applicability of the delhi rent control act was held to be barred in view of the special legislation relating to public premises in the public premises act, 1971.for the reasons aforesaid, the remedy of appeal before the school tribunal provided in the school act, was contended to bar the remedy before the industrial adjudicator under the ..... the implied repeal of the applicability of the ..... india : air 1990 sc 104on the doctrine of implied repeal. .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Rajiv Gupta and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)607; 96(2002)DLT225

..... arises in sub-section (2) of section 42 of the punjab land and revenue act, it was held:'again, it is pointed out by the courts that there being no provision similar to the provision in sub-section (3) which permits adducing of rebuttal evidence against the presumption that the lands belong to the state under sub-section (1) of section 42 of the revenue act, the presumption which arises under sub-section (2) of section 42 of the revenue act that the forest or quarry or land or interest belong to land-owner, cannot at all be rebutted by the state by adducing any contrary ..... referring to the entries in wajib-ul-arz prepared after 18th november, 1871 and to the provisions of the punjab land revenue act when there was nothing expressly stated in the entries in revenue records that the forest or quarry or land or interest in the estates belong to the government, it was held that it must be presumed that the minor mineral i.e. ..... the claimants also relied upon the provisions of sections 41 and 42 of the punjab land revenue act providing that in case the revenue records completed after 18th day of november, 1871, do not specifically and expressly mention a particular minor mineral vesting in the government in that case the minor mineral shall be presumed to belong to the owner of the land. ..... 5.3.1973 37. ..... on 5.3.1973 following order was passed in land acquisition case no. .....

Mohd. Ameer Deen Habib Vs. Enforcement Directorate

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997IVAD(Delhi)869; 1997CriLJ4581; 1997(4)Crimes303; 68(1997)DLT426; 1997(42)DRJ562; 1997RLR518

..... both are facing arrest in a complaint pending in delhi under sections 8(1), 8(2) read with section 14 of the foreign exchange regulation act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as fera) read with central government notification no. ..... as per mr.ashok arora, the learned counsel for the petitioners, since the 'hawala case' has ended in what he called a 'fiasco' with practically all the accused discharged and as the jain diaries, the bed-rock of the hawala case, have been held to be of no evidentiary value, the cases against the petitioners too would meet the same fate as they too are based on the said diaries. ..... (8) though mr.arora invited me to go deep into the allegations made in the complaints in question and so also into the intricacies of the hawala case, i think i need to steer clear from the molasses for it is no forum to go deep into the issues involved or to examine in depth either the allegations made or the evidence collected or not collected and its legal efficacy. ..... state of punjab : 1980crilj1125 refused to undertake such an exercise. .....

Smt. Sharda Mahajan Vs. Maple Leaf Trading International (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2007]139CompCas718(Delhi); (2007)2CompLJ455(Del); [2007]78SCL367(Delhi)

..... after the petitioner entered into these agreements news reports were published in the month of july, 1999 stating that the directors of the respondent company had been arrested for violation of the foreign exchange regulation act, 1973 etc. ..... in the light of the findings given above, it is, inter alia, held as under:(i) the respondent company is liable to be wound up on the ground of its inability to pay its debt under section 433(e) of the act for the following reasons:(a) the contract between the petitioner and the respondent company stands frustrated under section 56 of the contract act and the respondent company is liable to refund/restitute the amount received. ..... but is payable at a future date ( debitum in praesenti solvendum in futuro ); in the above example if under an agreement of tenancy rent is payable on the 15th of the following month, the rent for january becomes due on february 1, but is payable on february 15; and (iii) contingent debt which becomes payable on the happening of a certain event which may or may not occur; in the above instance the rent for the month of january will not be a debt in the preceding month of december for the tenant may or may not reside ..... the punjab and haryana high court in national investors forum v. .....

Edward Keventers (Successors) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Etc.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi377; ILR1983Delhi83; 1983RLR335

..... i hold that though a government grant is to be regulated by its own terms irrespective of the transfer of property act or any other law, yet no state can bind itself not to enact in future any law which it is, albeit subject to the constitution, competent to make on the subject matter of the grant and such law can expressed or by implication repeal or revoke or modify not merely any or all of the provisions of the grant or transfer but also the government grants act itself. ..... 172 (30), was a decision relating to section 16 of the punjab pre-emption act. ..... the estate officer issued a show cause notice on 22-10-1973 under section 4(1) of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971. ..... from time to time making representations clear and unequivocal to the petitioners up to 19-7-1971 that if they paid the damages demanded, the breaches would be regularised and re-entry in the premises shall not be affected and yet they determined the lease on 9-11-1972 with effect from 9-7-1971, without caring to take into consideration the very material said relevant facts that the breaches had occurred for reasons beyond the control of the petitioners and in spite of all possible and practicable steps .....

Nirmal Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 39(1989)DLT517; 1990(18)DRJ30; 1989RLR513

..... the supreme court was dealing with a case where an application had been filed before the sub divisional officer for the grant of license under section 5(1) and (2) of the punjab cinemas (regulation) act. ..... ' 5th resolution not only did the legal adviser give his opinion that the (31-7-1973) aforesaid decision of the corporation was contrary to the provisions of section 200(d) of the act but the lt. ..... 437 dated 31st july, 1973 that the government of india should be urged to amend the provisions of section 200 so that quarters could be sold at less than market price and on no profit no loss basil. ..... the petitioner in that case sought a writ of mandamus for directing the corporation to give effect to its resolution dated 28th november, 1983 whereby the scale of post of the assistant chief accountant had been revised with effect from 1st january, 1973. ..... the corporation, however, chose to reiterate its earlier decision and passed the following resolution no 437 dated 31st july, 1973 : 'resolved that the decision taken by the corporation vide its resolution no. ..... 266 of 1973, decided by this custom 26th august, 1974 that a writ of mandamus cannot issue to compel the commissioner to enter into a contract. ..... 868,13 and 437 dated 4-12-1970, 25-12-1972 and 12-5-1973 respectively, be reiterated. .....

Rai and Sons (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Phelps and Co. (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 38(1989)DLT94

..... 44 of the punjab land revenue act 1887 a presumption of truth attaches to the entries in jamabandi. ..... it further referred to the finding that the original agreement of lease between the landlady and the appellant company had not been acted upon and that that finding was based upon the fact that the company had been paying rent from the inception of the tenancy and that the company did not deny the tenancy in reply to the notice of the landlady. ..... that these terms could not be read into evidence as the instrument was not registered.it was also observed that according to the recitals the lessee included permitted assigns and there had been an absolute assignment of tenancy in favor of the appellant company and that if that was so, the appellant company had the obligation to deliver the demised premises to the landlady.the court also observed that it had not been possible for the appellant company to dislodge its admission that it was ..... 39,000.00 paidby rai was adjusted in the account of the tenant company and noting the account of rai and thereafter continuously for all these years bills for rent were raised by the landlord company in the name of the tenant company which paid the rent and receipts were given inthe name of the tenant company under the directions of rai'.it will thus be seen that it is not the case of the landlord company that premises were originally taken on rent by rai and that he either ..... 294/72, decided on 21.9.1973), a learned single judge (b.c. .....

Gurvinder Kang and ors. Vs. Director of Education and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)449; 2000(53)DRJ332

..... it is submitted that as per section 10 of the delhi school education act, 1973 ('the act') the scale of pay, allowances and other prescribed benefits of the employees of a recognised private school cannot be less than those of the employees of the corresponding status working in government schools. ..... which read as under : '5(c) a government servant shall not be entitled to house rent allowance if__ (i) he shares government accommodation allotted rent free to another government servant; or (ii) he/she resides in accommodation allotted to his/her parents/son/daughter by the central government, state government, an autonomous public undertaking or semi-government organisation such as a municipality, port trust, nationalised banks, life insurance corporation of india, etc. ..... the school is a recognised private schools as defined under section 2(r) of the delhi school education act, 1973. ..... undisputedly, there is no provi sion in the act or in the rules made on the subject of hra for the employees of the schools governed by the act including unaided recognised private schools like respondent no. 3. ..... punjab university & anr. .....

ArwachIn Bharti Bhawan Vs. the Directorate of Education

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)169; 86(2000)DLT99; 2000(54)DRJ124

..... as per the provisions of the delhi school education act, 1973 and the rules thereunder, a committee for holding a domestic inquiry was constituted and, consequently, the second respondent was removed from service vide order dated 19.9.1987. ..... managing committee, dr.hari ram (co education) higher secondary school & others', : (1993)iillj549sc , the appellant before the supreme court was principal of dr.hari ram (co-education) higher secondary school, datarpur in tehsil of dasuya in the district of hoshiarpur in the state of punjab. ..... rule 118 of the delhi school education rules, 1973 reads as under:-'disciplinary authorities in respect of employeesthe disciplinary committee in respect of every recognised private school, whether aided or not, shall consist of_(i) the chairman of the managing committee of the school; (ii) the manager of the school; (iii) a nominee of the director, in the case of an aided school, or a nominee of the appropriate authority, in the case of an unaided school; (iv) the head of the school, except where the disciplinary proceeding is against him and where the disciplinary proceeding is against the head of the school, the head of any other .....