Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 24.1 on the other hand, the judgments of four other high courts, namely, punjab and haryana, orissa, rajasthan and gujarat did not consider the controversy from the perspective of the constitutional entries and section 2 of the mmdr act, 1957. ..... of mines and minerals for individual gains by a few inamdars and also to prevent the huge loss of royalty by the state government and to give effect to the policy of the state government towards securing that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good and that the operation of the economic system does 322 section 6, up zamindari abolition and land reforms act 1950 323 maharashtra abolition of subsisting proprietary rights to mine and minerals in certain lands ..... for example, the uttar pradesh zamindari abolition and land reforms act 1950 vested all the rights of the proprietors in the sub-soil including mines and minerals with the state government.322 the maharashtra personal inams abolition act 1953 abolished inam rights, but saved the rights of the inamdars and jagirdars to mines and minerals. .....
Tag this Judgment!