Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the pondicherry settlement act 1970 Page 93 of about 21,582 results (0.333 seconds)

Jan 23 2008 (HC)

Sarasa Appalakonda and ors. Vs. Pulamarasetti Somunaidu and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD742; 2008(4)ALT174

..... family and in the light of the same, the findings recorded by the ..... the respondents would submit that it may be that the origin of the property at the stage of grandfather had been from other source and not from the paternal side, but, however, in the light of the facts and circumstances and also in the light of different provisions of the hindu succession act, 1956 which came into force subsequent thereto, by operation of law and since the succession already had opened as far as the father of the plaintiff is concerned, the same to be taken as the family property and the father to be construed as karta of the ..... the settlement deed dated 17.5.1970 settling item 1 of the schedule property is not at all valid especially in respect of the plaintiffs half share and it is not supported by any legal necessity or benefit to the estate. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 2006 (HC)

Rani Sundarammani Vs. Govt. of A.P., Revenue Department and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD184; 2006(4)ALT374

..... shall have power-(a) to give effect to the provisions of this act and in particular to superintend the taking over of estates and to make due arrangements for the interim administration thereof;(b) to issue instructions for the guidance of the director, district collectors, settlement officers and managers of estates;(c) to cancel or revise any of the orders, acts or proceedings of any settlement officer other than those in respects of which an appeal lies to the tribunal or of any manager; and(d) to cancel or revise any of the orders, acts or proceedings of the director or of any district collector, including ..... and reads as under:consequences of notification of estate.with effect on and from the notified date and save as otherwise expressly provided in this act-(a) the madras permanent settlement regulation, 1802, the estates land act, and all other enactments applicable to the estate as such except the madras estates land (reduction of rent) act, 1947, shall be deemed to have been repealed in their application to the estate;(b) the entire estate (including all communal lands and porambokes; other non-ryoti lands; waste ..... aggrieved by the order of the settlement officer, nellore dated 2-5-1970, the respondent sri s ..... after a detailed consideration of the evidence, adduced on behalf of the petitioners and the respondents, the settlement officer, by order dated 2-5-1970, ordered that ryotwari patta be granted in favour of sri a ..... sarvagna krishna air 1970 sc 1975, (2) gandi ramamurty .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1995 (HC)

Teluguntla Venkateswara Rao Vs. Teluguntla Sundara Satyanarayana and o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(3)ALT322

..... the plaintiff was also an attestor to the settlement deed executed by the first defendant in favour of his wife namely the second defendant under ex. b-9. ..... ' it was held that'what the appellant in effect says is that where a person has obtained a transfer of property under an order of the court as the result of a gross fraud, the court is powerless to remedy the injustice caused unless section 53 of the transfer of property act can be invoked. ..... 263 /1970 filed by the plaintiff is vitiated by fraud and collusion between the plaintiff and the first defendant. ..... by the time the suit o.s.108/71 was filed, the plaintiff already filed a suit on 15-10-1970 and obtained attachment order under exs ..... 250/- than the market rate by the end of 1970 whichever is earlier ..... 250/- man the market rate by the end of 1970 whichever was earlier ..... b-13 against the first defendant on 15th october, 1970 itself the plaintiff obtained attachment before judgment under exs ..... sub-judge, vijayawada against the first defendant as manager of his joint family on 15-10-1970 for recovery of the said pronote debts. ..... since the agreement did not fructify, the plaintiff issued another notice on 28-9-1970. ..... 263/70 on 15-10-1970 for realisation of the amounts covered under exs ..... a-11 and a-13 dated 15-10-1970 and 16-10-1970. ..... 263/70 on 15-10-1970 under exs. ..... 263/70 on 15th october, 1970 under ex. ..... from 10th february, 1956 to 10th february, 1964 with an option for a renewal until 10-2-1970. ..... 6-3 dated 28-9-1970. ..... on 14th september, 1970 a-s.no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2001 (HC)

Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Tribes Employees Association Vs. Aditya Prata ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD582; 2001(6)ALT433

..... rule 19 of the rules is to the effect that if there is likely to be delay in finalizing the enquiry either for issue of integrated community certificate or for cancellation of such certificate duly following the procedure contemplated under section 5 read with rules 8 and 9, the competent authority may inform the principal or the educational institution to admit the candidate (in the case of educational institutions) on the basis of the declaration given by the candidate and that such admission shall be provisional for a period of three months from the date of communication from the competent authority. ..... and secure an appointment to an office or post under the state or public employment or admission into an educational institution maintained by the state or receiving aid from the state, on later investigation, though belated, was found that the certificate produced was false and the candidate was dismissed from the post or office or debarred or sent out from the institution or from the balance course of the study, the plea of promissory estoppel would always be found favour with the courts and being easily extended in favour ..... officer, bareilly, : [1970]78itr26(sc) , the supreme court laid down that:an order under section 35 of the income tax act is appealable. ..... union territory of pondicherry, : [1967]2scr650 , it was observed, it is trite to say that a decisions binding not because of its conclusions but in regard to its ratio and the principles, laid down therein'. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1985 (HC)

Mandegam Radhakrishna Reddy Vs. Sri Bharathi Velu Bus Service and Pres ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1986AP102; (1986)ILLJ336AP

..... a presiding officer of any labour court or industrial tribunal, constituted under the industrial disputes act, 1947 or under any corresponding law relating to the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes in force in the state or any commissioner for workmen's compensation or other officer with experience as a judges of a civil court or as a stipendiary magistrate to be the authority to hear and decide for any specified are all claims arising out of deductions from the wages or delay in payment of wages, of persons employed or paid in that are ..... in the instant case the labour court did only that and had rightly enquired into the jurisdictional fact as to the existence of the workman's right to claim wages and thereafter held that the appellant as an employee of the first respondent was entitled to the wages claimed by him from 19th december, 1970 to 11th october, 1973. ..... it is an admitted fact that on 19th december, 1970 the bus which the workman was driving on the route tirupati to nellore was involved in an accident. ..... here it may be noticed that during the period 19th december, 1970 to 11th october, 1973 neither the workman was suspended from service pending enquiry nor was any order of termination passed against him. ..... it was their case that the workman reported for duty only after the disposal of the criminal case on 10th october, 1973 which ended in acquittal and as such they were not liable to pay him wages from 19th december, 1970 to 10th october, 1973. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2003 (HC)

State of U.P. Vs. Ramgarh Farms Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1199

..... in the event of admitting the right of any person to the land, the forest settlement officer, under section 11(2), can either exclude such land from the limits of the proposed forest or come to an agreement with the owner thereof for the surrender of his rights or proceed to acquire such land in the manner provided by the land acquisition act, 1894. ..... the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that since the land in question has been declared as included in the reserved forest area by issuance of notification dated 27.7.1970 which notification has become final between the parties, the learned single judge was not justified in directing the district authorities to correct the revenue record according to the decision given by this court in the matter of the petitioner and also to pay compensation. ..... subsequently after considering the objections, the state government issued a notification dated 27.7.1970 under section 20 of the forest act declaring the land mentioned in the schedule to the said notification as reserved forest area. ..... the notification under section 20 of the forest act was issued on 27.7.1970 declaring the forest area mentioned in the notification dated 16.2.1966 with some exception to be reserved forest. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 1973 (HC)

Kikkar Singh Vs. Daddahoor Co-operative Agricultural Service Society a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1974P& H299

..... exercising its inherent powers under section 151 of the code of civil procedure the executing court accepted both the applications and restored the two execution proceedings after giving a finding that the statements made by shri shivdarshan kumar on the 18th of july, 1970, were shown to be factually incorrect and that the justice of the case was on the side of the society. ..... it was in pursuance of that settlement that baldev singh actually instructed the counsel for the society to have the execution proceedings filed for the reason that the decrees had been satisfied in full. ..... in order to meet it, applications have been filed on behalf of the judgment-debtors under sections 5 and 14 of the limitation act with the prayers that the delay in filing the applications for revision of the orders of the executing court be condoned. ..... article 181 of the schedule to the limitation act, 1963, runs thus: 'description of application period of limitation time from which period begins to run. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2000 (SC)

Lakhpat Rai Juneja Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC1016; JT2000(2)SC385; (2000)125PLR221; 2000(2)SCALE48; (2000)3SCC75

..... by an order dated 8th march, 1973, the secretary to the government of haryana in exercise of powers under section 33 of the act cancelled the order of chief settlement commissioner of april, 1969 directing transfer and sale of the property to the appellant at about rs. ..... soon thereafter, a petition under section 33 of the act was filed before the central government by 11 persons challenging the transfer and sale in favour of the appellant pursuant to the order of the chief settlement commissioner. ..... by a notification dated 17th april, 1970, the government of india, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section 1 of section 34 of the act directed that powers exercisable by it under sub-section 4 of section 24, 28 and section 33 of the act shall be exercisable also by the secretary to the government of haryana, rehabilitation department, in respect of proceedings pertaining to acquired evacuee properties and lands situate within the state of haryana.3. ..... the said petition had been initially filed before central government but was transferred to be dealt by the secretary to government of haryana, rehabilitation department after the powers had been delegated in terms of notification dated 17th april, 1970. ..... we are unable to accept the constitution sought to be placed by learned counsel on the notification dated 17th april, 1970. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 1989 (SC)

Kayastha Pathshala, Allahabad and anr. Vs. Rajendra Prasad and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC415; 1989(2)SCALE1394; 1989Supp(2)SCC732; [1989]Supp2SCR450; (1990)1UPLBEC429

..... for immediate reference we may set out the same hereunder (paras 1 to 3):the high court in the judgment recorded the following findings:the result is, as noticed above, that although it cannot be said that the order dated 30 december 1965/7january 1966 suspending the plaintiff from service of the defendant college was illegal or null and void inoperative against the plaintiff from its inception, it did cease to be operative with effect from 17 october 1975 on the expiry of 60 days from the commencement of the u.p. ..... the payment shall be treated as a final settlement of all his claims.the payment shall be made by the management and not by government. ..... the dismissed principal of the college filed a suit for reinstatement, inter alia, contending that the management of the college though a society registered under the co-operative societies act was a statutory body since affiliated to the agra university (and subsequently to meerut university). ..... the appeal against the judgment of the high court in second appeal no, 2038 of 1970 is disposed of accordingly. ..... 2038 of 1970 was dismissed confirming the finding of the additional civil judge as to the validity of the suspension order. ..... 2038 of 1970 thus fell for consideration in the light of fresh points raised in the amplified plaint.8. ..... 2038 of 1970 was then pending in the high court. ..... jewan lal mehrotra : (1970)iillj54sc and sirsi municipality v. ..... chandra kiran tyagi : (1970)illj32sc ; bank of baroda v. ..... 2038 of 1970. ..... 2036 of 1970. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 1981 (SC)

Air India Vs. Nergesh Meerza and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1981SC1829; 1981LabIC1313; (1981)IILLJ314SC; 1981(3)SCALE1275; (1981)4SCC335; [1982]1SCR438; 1981(2)SLJ349(SC)

..... the procedure laid down in the act....i am definitely of opinion that the necessity of a speedier trial is too vague, uncertain and elusive a criterion to form a rational basis for the discriminations made....but the question is: how is this necessity of speedier trial to be determined not by reference to the nature of the offences or the circumstances under which or the area in which they are committed, nor even by reference to any peculiarities or antecedents of the offenders themselves, but the selection is left to the absolute and unfettered discretion of the executive government with nothing in the ..... also contended that even though the period of the award has expired, they continue to be binding on the parties and as these matters pertain to industrial dispute, this court should not disturb the settlement arrived at or the awards given by the national tribunals and allow the disputes to be settled in the proper forum, viz. ..... tribunal, before whom a part of the dispute between several workmen was settled but the dispute which was not settled including the question of the age of retirement of ahs was referred to this tribunal some time in november 1970 and the award was given on 25th february ..... : (1970)illj6sc -where it was pointed out that article 16(1) would be attracted only if there is a breach of equality between members of the same class of employees and article 14 did not contemplate equality between members of separate or ..... rangachari : (1970)iillj289sc where gajendragadkar .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //