Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... means the partnership firm, namely, the shivraj fine art litho works, nagpur, registered under the indian partnership act, 1932, with head office at subhash road, nagpur, as it existed immediately before its dissolution on the 9th january 1974 and includes the receiver or receivers appointed in civil suit no.9 of 1974 in the court of the civil judge, senior division, nagpur. ..... sub-section (1) of section 8 of the act provides that for the deprivation of the proprietors of the management of their undertaking (which has remained closed with effect from the 17th may 1979 to the 22nd august 1980) during the period commencing on the 23rd august 1980 being the date on which the undertaking was taken over in pursuance of the orders made by the central government under the provisions of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 and ending on the appointed day, there shall be paid by the state government to the proprietors in cash and ..... in the manner specified in chapter vi, an amount of rupees five thousand per .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... the definition of the expression conciliation proceeding under section 2(e) of the act of 1947, the provisions of rule 11 of the rules, the notice dated 20-07-2011 issued by the conciliation officer and the failure report dated 29-01-2012 support aforesaid conclusion that the conciliation proceedings commenced from 26-07-2011. ..... this writ petition filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india challenges the order dated 27-09-2013 passed below exhibit-10 thereby holding that the statement of claim filed by the petitioner union in relation to the transfer of 140 employees was beyond the scope of the industrial dispute that had been referred for adjudication. ..... modi (supra) and sarguja transport (supra) are concerned, as it has been found that the issue regarding transfer of 140 employees was not the subject matter of the reference made, it is not necessary to consider the effect of withdrawal of complaint (ulpa) no.245 of 2011 without any liberty being granted to file a fresh complaint. 16. ..... in this background, the other issues relating to the statement of claim filed by the petitioner union and opposition thereto by the respondent no.1-management on the ground that the same was in respect of an industrial dispute not referred for adjudication under section 10 of the act of 1947 will have to be considered. 11. ..... 1932 and gopinath daulat dalvi vs. .....
Tag this Judgment!