Court : Kolkata
Reported in : 2008(2)CHN546
..... in the case of somawanti (supra) that the notification under section 6(1) of the said act did not exclusively constitute the fact that the government had decided to make payment at the expense of the acquisition or even to state that the government is prepared to make a part of the contribution to the cost of acquisition, it has also been held by the constitution bench that a contribution to be made by the state, need not be substantial even a token ..... west bengal) the writ petitioners themselves described as the bargadars within the meaning of section 2 sub-section (2) of the west bengal land reforms act, 1955 and submitted that the names of the writ petitioners were recorded under section 21d of the act of 1955 read with section 14i of the west ..... province of madras : air1960ap343 , a full bench of the madras high court held that a declaration by the provincial government under section 6(1) of the act that certain lands were required for a public purpose is final, and, where there is no charge against the provincial government that it had acted in fraud of its powers its action in directing the ..... [1973]1scr973 , was at a much better footing than the instant case, where the only disclosure of the 'public purpose' is stated ..... . the court further held that in our view, permitting the argument on excess land to be heard again to scuttle a project of this magnitude for public benefit would encourage dishonest politically motivated irrigation and permit ..... created. [see levy, .....
Tag this Judgment!