Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the madras inams act 1869 Court: gujarat Page 7 of about 448 results (0.096 seconds)

Ramjibhai Morarbhai Patel Vs. Additional Development Commissioner and ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1992)2GLR1204; (1993)2GLR1713

..... is rightly and appropriately exercised especially when the offences in which the petitioners are involved are reprehensible and when the acts attributed to the petitioners virtually amounted to interfering with the democratic process of election by the duly elected representative such as sarpanch and or upa-sarpanch of the gram panchayat. ..... similar observations of the division bench of sind high court in the case of rasulbaksh (supra) are also required to be read in the content of the facts and circumstances, and more particularly, keeping in mind the fact that the court was concerned with criminal trial inconnection with the provisions of arms act, 1878. ..... he has further submitted that while referring to various decisions which were not dealing with the identical provision it would not be just and proper for the court to construe the phraseology employed under section 51(1) of the said act, especially when the two learned single judges of this court have taken a view which has been constantly followed till date by this court as well as by the officers in the state. ..... has exercised the power to suspend the petitioner in each case and the additional development commissioner had confirmed the said order while exercising appellate power under section 51(3) of the act, and therefore, no interference of this court is called for under article 227 of the constitution of india, more so, when no jurisdictional error is pointed out by the petitioners. .....

Kanubha Gulabsinh Parmar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2004)1GLR852

..... mangukia's arguments, that neither section 145f nor section 145j of the act is applicable to the facts of the case, and there is no ground at all for disqualifying the petitioner no.1 and for rejecting the petitioner no.1's nomination form as the petitioner has not acquired any of the disqualifications which are mentioned in section 145f of the act, and the invocation of these provisions against the petitioners is absolutely unjust and improper and on that ground alone the respondent no.2's order deserves to be quashed and set aside, do not much weigh with ..... 226 of the constitution of india challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the order passed by the city deputy collector and election authority of gujarat state cooperative marketing federation ltd (gujkomasol), the respondent no.2 herein on 23rd june 2003 whereby the nomination of the petitioner no.1 for election of the gujkomasol is rejected on the ground that the petitioner is convicted under sub-clause (b) of clause (1) of section 145f of the gujarat cooperative societies act, 1961 ('act' for short) by the development commissioner and thereby the petitioner no.1 is disqualified to contest the election of gujkomasol .....

Bhikhabhai Keshavlal Patel Vs. Election Officer, Dist. Central Co-op. ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2002)1GLR552

..... here the order of disqualification must be published before the returning officer exercises his jurisdiction.4.2 in view of the provisions of the act, the order passed by the district registrar at annexure-a dated 24-7-2001 rejecting the nomination of the petitioner cannot be sustained in the eye of law because the condition precedent for exercising the power under rule 23 does not exist in this behalf.4.3 in view of the judgment of this court in special civil application no. ..... , (supra) as well as the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of umesh shivappa (supra) and also section 145u of the actand contended that the present petition is not maintainable at law and the petitioner must be relegated to the election remedy.3.6 in my view, section 145u of the act provides for filing of the election petition after the election is over. ..... 11 and 24 of the said judgment of this court which read as under :'para 11 - in view of the aforesaid settled proposition of law, it would be expedient and appropriate, at this stage, to consider the material and relevant aspects which are, virtually, incontrovertible : (1) the nomination form of the petitioner in the first petition came to be rejected by virtue of the impugned order of the respondent election officer, as he has been removed from the membership in exercise of the powers under section 13(1) and also section 33(11a) of the act. .....

Ambica Wood Works Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1979]43STC338(Guj)

..... 2023, the sales tax officer had levied tax on the sales of these tables under residuary entry 22 of schedule e to the bombay sales tax act, 1959, rejecting the contention advanced on behalf of the applicant that the goods in question were covered by entry 15 of schedule c to the said act pertaining to machinery used in the manufacture of the goods, spare parts and accessories thereof other than the specified machinery in any of the schedules to the said act. 2. ..... that having regard to the size of the tables supplied and also having regard further to the object for which they have been sold and the use to which they have been put to, which we have extracted as above from the order of the tribunal, and, more particularly, having regard to the fact that these tables have been fitted with steam pipes which act as instantaneous driers, the entire assembly of the tables, pipes, screen prints and the rolls is nothing else ..... but a machinery and, consequently, therefore, the tables which have been used therein are .....

State of Gujarat Vs. Manharlal Ambalal Soni

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1976)17GLR427

..... that clause (d) of section 111 refers to any prohibition imposed by the customs act or any other law which may be in force at the material timeandat the material time foreign exchange regulation act 1947 was m force section 8 of that act provides that central government may by notification in the official gazette order that subject to such exemn tions, if any, as may be contained in the notification no person shall except with the general or special permission of the reserve bank and on payment a, fu hnyprescribed in that behalf, ..... then argued that the complaint under the gold control act required to be instituted by a gold control officer having jurisdiction over the area in which the offence is committed or any person authorised by him in writing in this behalf under section 97 of the gold control act and that the assistant collector of customs at ahmedabad who had instituted the complaint was not an officer who had jurisdiction in regard to the area in which the offence was committed. ..... bring into india any gold and gold has been defined by section 2(f) to include gold in the form of come, whether legal tender or not, in the form of bullion or into whether refined or not and jewellery or articles made wholly or mainly of gold a notification as contemplated by section 8 of the foreign exchange regulation act, 1947, was issued by the central government on 25th august 1948 the said notification as amended upto 31st july 1958 has been published .....

Mahendra Shantilal Shah Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1984]56CompCas70(Guj); (1982)2GLR284

..... , the high court shall direct shall direct the official liquidator or another person having, for the time being, charge of the management or control of the industrial undertaking, whether by or under the orders of any court, or any contract of instrument or otherwise, to make over the managements of such undertaking or the concerned part, as the case may be, to the authorised persons and thereupon the authorised person shall be deemed to be the official liquidator in respect of the industrial undertaking or the concerned part, as the case may be.....' 6. ..... 18fa of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, (the act), the learned company judge passed an order making the summons absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b) with the modification that the authoriese person will be the gujarat state textile corporation. ..... 391 of the companies act, but the efforts did not succeed. ..... entry 23 of the schedule to the act, inter alia, pertains to 'textiles made wholly or in part of cotton, including cotton, yarn, hosiery and rope'. ..... iii-aa of the act relating to 'management or control of industrial undertakings owned by companies in liquidation', the central govt. .....

Sojitra Mohan Haribhai and anr. Vs. Vala Visaman Kalubhai and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1971)12GLR138

..... grounds:(i) a candidate being disqualified or not qualified under the act or these rules for election;(ii) nominator not being qualified to nominate the candidate;(iii) failure to comply with any of the provisions prescribed by these rules or the act;(iv) a candidate, proposed or seconder not being identical with the person whose electoral number is specified in the nomination paper as the number of such candidate, proposed or seconder, as the case may be;(v) the signature of the candidate, or of the proposed or seconder not being genuine or having been obtained by fraud.non-compliance ..... with both the aforesaid requirements of rule 8 regarding the nominators being qualified to nominate, and .....

Rukshmaniben Wd/O. Vasantlal Motilal Vs. Vadilal Narayandas Jadawala a ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1994)1GLR530

..... secretary of state air 1938 madras 193 and the legal position was summed up as follows:the legal position may be briefly stated thus : the right to sue under article 120 of the limitation act accrues when the defendant has clearly and unequivocally threatened to infringe the right asserted by the plaintiff in the suit. ..... zaveri, learned counsel for the defendant would submit that article 58 of the limitation act, 1963 would be the appropriate article to govern the situation, since the plaintiffs have in substance sought for a declaration that the defendant is not the absolute owner of the suit house and she has no right to alienate it, and the present suit would be one 'to obtain any other declaration' spoken to in that article. ..... : [1960]2scr253 , after adverting to the pronouncements of the judicial committee referred to above, there was also a reference to the pronouncement of the division bench of the high court of madras in pothukutchi appa rao and ors. v. ..... we can take it that the plaintiffs want the court to declare that the defendant is not the absolute owner of the suit house and she has no right to alienate it and in that sense article 58 of the limitation act, 1963 would be attracted to the suit of the plaintiffs. .....

Regional Director, Employee State Insurance Corp. Vs. Bhavnagar Vegeta ...

Court : Gujarat

..... thus, in the aforesaid facts, the questions which are required to be considered by this court are i) whether washing allowance can be said to be 'wages' within the meaning of section 2(22) of the esi act or not and; ii) if the washing allowance is considered to be wages and is included in the monthly salary of the employee, and if it exceeds rs.1600/, whether the unit is exempted from making payment of contribution of such employees to the corporation. 10. ..... the case related to the payment of an exgratia reward styled as an 'inam' (a bounty) which was admittedly not claimed to be 'additional remuneration, if any, paid at intervals not exceeding two months' but claimed to be 'remuneration paid or payable to in cash to an employee if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied was fulfilled' which the court found it was not. ..... high court of madras has in the case of regional director, (tamilnadu) employees state insurance corporation v. ..... it is further revealed that on one hand the corporation has submitted that washing allowance and medical allowance are covered within the definition of the term wages, however, on the other hand, if the said allowance are included in the monthly salary of the workman and the same exceeds rs.1600/, in spite of that, the corporation has insisted that the unit is required to pay the contribution for such an employee also. .....

Ambaben and ors. Vs. Usmanbhai Amirmiya Shaikh and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1979Guj9; (1978)GLR1134; (1978)GLR913

..... -section (1), a policy of insurance shall cover any liability incurred in respect of any one accident up to the following limits, namely- (a) where the vehicle is a goods vehicle, a limit of fifty thousand rupees in all, including the liabilities, if any, arising under the workmen's compensation act 1923, in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to, employees (other than the driver), not exceeding six in number, being carried in the vehicle; (b) where the vehicle is a vehicle in which passengers are carried for hire or reward or by reason of or in pursuance of a contract ..... , arising out of and in the course of his employment of the employee of a person insured by the policy or in respect of bodily injury sustained by such an employee arising out of and in the course of his employment other than a liability arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to, any such employee- (a) engaged in driving the vehicle, or (b) if it is a public service vehicle, engaged as a conductor of the vehicle or in examining tickets on the vehicle, or (c)if it is a goods vehicle, being carried in the vehicle, or except where the vehicle is a vehicle in which passengers .....