Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1958/2017& conn. + % W.P.(C) No.1958/2017 ANIL LAMBA & ORS. Through: versus GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. 6th March, 2017 ........ Petitioners Mr. Pawan K. Bahl and Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Saurabh Chaddha and Mr. Ishan Kashyap, Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Siddharth Panda and Mr. Govind Kr. Advocates for R-3. W.P.(C) No.2001/2017 JEENA JOSEPH & ORS. Through: ........ Petitioners Mr. Pawan K. Bahl and Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocates. GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Saurabh Chaddha and Mr. Ishan Kashyap, Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Siddharth Panda and Mr. Govind Kr. Advocates for R-3. W.P. (C) No.1958/2017& conn. Page 1 of 30 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By these writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on: March 01, 2017 Judgment Reserved on: February 21, 2017 RSA2212016 NIRMALA DEVI & ORS. Through: Mr.S.C.Singhal, Advocate ..... Appellants * % + versus JAI DUTT ..... Respondent Through: Mr.T.R.Kashyap, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT RSA2212016 1. By way of this Regular Second Appeal, the appellants are invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure impugning the judgment and order of the First Appellate Court passed in Civil Appeal No.RCA-02/2014 whereby the appeal filed by the respondent herein (defendant in Civil Suit No.177/2012) was allowed and the judgment and decree dated 4th January, 2014 passed by the learned Trial Court was set aside.2. The facts in brief are that the Civil Suit No.177/2012 was filed by Sh.Anand Dev Sharma (deceased now represented through his legal heirs Smt.Nirmala Devi, the appellant No.1 and their children, appellant Nos.2 to1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3007-3008 OF2017[Arising out of SLP [C]. Nos. 1483-1484 of 2015]. Prabhakara Adiga Appellant Vs. Gowri & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT ARUN MISHRA, J.1. Leave granted.2. Singular question involved in the matter is executability of decree for permanent injunction against the legal representatives of judgment- debtor.3. A suit was filed by the appellant registered as Original Suit No.83/2007 in the Court of II Additional Civil Judge, Kundapura, with respect to immovable property described in Schedule A of the plaint. The plaintiff got converted the land for non-agricultural/residential purposes. The plaintiff was in possession and enjoyment of the property and defendant had no concern with the same. However, he tried to remove and destroy the wooden fence and made an effort to forcibly dispossess the plaintiff. Hence the suit was filed. The defendant had denied the averments and contended that there was...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2. This Writ Petition was filed challenging the order passed by the second respondent dated 17.08.2016 confirming the order of the first respondent dated 17.05.2016 declaring the petitioner as a poor performer for a period of three years. The undisputed facts in the present case are that the petitioner is a Company offering consultancy services primarily to the Government and Public Sector Organizations running the Railways. The petitioner Company executed several projects. They also executed projects for clients located outside India. In respect of Indian Railways, they have executed over 150 projects from its inception in 1988. Based on the performance of the petitioner, the petitioner was selected to execute projects for the first respondent. On 30.09.2013 the first respondent floated seven distinct tenders (Request For Proposal) for appointment of consultant from project consultancy services fo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h February, 2017. CS(OS) No.2092/2013 and IA No.14295/2016 (of the plaintiff under Order XI Rules 1& 14 CPC) CAPTAIN BHUPINDER KUMAR SURI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Venancio Dcosta and Ms. Astha, Advs. Versus NARESH KUMAR SURI & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. M.R. Chawla and Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Advs. Ms. Pankhi proxy counsel for Mr. Rajeev Kapoor, Adv. for D-2&3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.6967/2014 (of defendant no.1 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC).1. The counsel for the applicant/defendant no.1 and the senior counsel for the plaintiff have been heard.2. Besides the defendant no.1, only the counsel for the defendants no.2&3 appears and who are supporting the plaintiff.3. The plaintiff has instituted this suit inter alia pleading:-"(i) that the father of the plaintiff and the defendants no.1 to 6 (defendants) namely Major Khemraj Suri was allotted plot ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.132 OF2016Asha Ranjan ... Petitioner Versus State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.147 OF2016Chandrakeshwar Prasad Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Regard being had to the similitude of prayers and considering the commonality of issues exposited in these Writ Petitions, they were finally heard together. The principal issue raised is disposed of by this singular order. It is necessary to note that in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.132 of 2016 preferred by Asha Ranjan, it has been prayed for issue of appropriate directions to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to take over the investigation in connection with FIR No.362/16 dated 13.05.2016 under Police Station Nagar Thana, Siwan, District Siwan under Sections 302/120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC); to transfer the entire proceedings and tri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 300-303 OF2017(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.6117-6120 of 2015) STATE OF KARNATAKA APPELLANT(S) :Versus: SELVI J.JAYALALITHA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.304-307 OF2017(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.6294-6297 of 2015) K. ANBAZHAGAN APPELLANT(S) :Versus: SELVI J.JAYALALITHA & ORS. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.308-313 OF2017(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.6121-6126 of 2015) K. ANBAZHAGAN APPELLANT(S) :Versus: INDO DOHA CHEMICALS & PHARMACEUTICALS AND ORS. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.314-319 OF2017(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.7107-7112 of 2015) STATE OF KARNATAKA APPELLANT(S) :Versus: INDO DOHA CHEMICALS & PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. AND ORS. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.Leave granted. These appeals project a challenge to the judgment and order dated 11.5.2015 rendered by the High Court of Karnatka in the appeals preferred b...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * + W.P.(C) 287/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF QUALITY EDUCATION FOR ALL AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sunil Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vedanta Varma, Mr. Vibhor Kush and Mr. Sanat Tokas, Advocates. versus DDA AND ORS Through Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG and ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. S. Gurukrishna Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. SC (Civil), Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC (Civil) and Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC (Civil), Mr. R.A. Iyer, Ms. Rhea Verma, Ms. Adrija Thakur, Ms. R. Sneha, Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Rizwan Nizami, Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Ms. Shruthi P., Mr. Mohan Raj and Mr. Kartik Rai, Advocates for GNCTD/DoE. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Akshita Manocha and Ms. Isha Garg, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Sumit Misra, Advocate for UOI. WITH W.P.(C) 287/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 58 + W.P.(C) 272/2017 ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PRIVATE SCHOOLS ........ Petitioner Through ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * + W.P.(C) 287/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF QUALITY EDUCATION FOR ALL AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sunil Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vedanta Varma, Mr. Vibhor Kush and Mr. Sanat Tokas, Advocates. versus DDA AND ORS Through Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG and ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. S. Gurukrishna Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. SC (Civil), Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC (Civil) and Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC (Civil), Mr. R.A. Iyer, Ms. Rhea Verma, Ms. Adrija Thakur, Ms. R. Sneha, Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Rizwan Nizami, Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Ms. Shruthi P., Mr. Mohan Raj and Mr. Kartik Rai, Advocates for GNCTD/DoE. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Akshita Manocha and Ms. Isha Garg, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Sumit Misra, Advocate for UOI. WITH W.P.(C) 287/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 58 + W.P.(C) 272/2017 ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PRIVATE SCHOOLS ........ Petitioner Through ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * + W.P.(C) 287/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF QUALITY EDUCATION FOR ALL AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sunil Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vedanta Varma, Mr. Vibhor Kush and Mr. Sanat Tokas, Advocates. versus DDA AND ORS Through Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG and ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. S. Gurukrishna Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. SC (Civil), Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC (Civil) and Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC (Civil), Mr. R.A. Iyer, Ms. Rhea Verma, Ms. Adrija Thakur, Ms. R. Sneha, Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Rizwan Nizami, Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Ms. Shruthi P., Mr. Mohan Raj and Mr. Kartik Rai, Advocates for GNCTD/DoE. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Akshita Manocha and Ms. Isha Garg, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Sumit Misra, Advocate for UOI. WITH W.P.(C) 287/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 58 + W.P.(C) 272/2017 ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PRIVATE SCHOOLS ........ Petitioner Through ...
Tag this Judgment!