Court : Kerala
..... having regard to the recommendations made by the law commission in the fourteenth and twenty- seventh reports, the committee recommend that s.115 of the code should be retained subject to the modification that no revision application shall lie against an interlocutory order unless either of the following conditions is satisfied, namely. ..... again in the year 1999, the section was amended (it was made enforceable with effect from 1.7.2002). ..... apart from adding sub section (2), a proviso as under was added to sub section (1) :- "provided that the high court shall not, under this section, vary or reverse any order made, or any order deciding an issue, in the course of a suit or other proceedings, except where- (a) the order, if it had been made in favour of the party applying for revision, would have finally disposed of the suit or other proceeding, or (b) the order if allowed to stand, would occasion a failure of justice or cause irreparable injury ..... he filed application under order ix rule 13 of the code to set aside the ex parte decree along with an application to condone the delay under section 5 of the limitation act alleging that he was laid up due to illness while his presence was required by the trial court. ..... in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice thottathil b.radhakrishnan & the hon'ble mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... to make any further contractual appointment of fse till regularisation of all fse working in kerala in the existing posts of fse in kerala; c) issue a writ of certiorari or other writ or direction to quash the terms contractual appointments in ext.p1 scheme since the same is illegal, arbitrary and violation of provisions contract labour abolition act, 1970 and of the lic act, which do not provide for such appointment on contractual basis in the lic particularly, when the appointment of fse is made after following a regular statutory selection process; d) declare ..... which is the copy of the insurance regulatory and development authority (licensing of corporate agent) amendment regulation, 2010, it was argued by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the respondent corporation is not insisting enforcement of a class in ext.p14 clarifying that the bank with wpc no.9608/2014 23 specified person is the agent and consequently, the fscs who are engaged to deal with the specified person of the bank would be wrongly treated as agent, though the intention was to treat the bank employee as the specified ..... the banks would get commission for that and lic is entitled to premium. ..... p26- true copy of notification dated1610.2002 (insurance regulatory and development authority( licensing of corporate agents) regulations2002. .....
Tag this Judgment!