Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala warehouses act 1960 Page 4 of about 67,114 results (1.364 seconds)

Jayaprakash Vs. Government of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2007(1)KLT343; (2007)2LLJ427Ker

..... since the main question involved in this case is as to whether respondents 6 and 7 unions are entitled to do 'attimari work' in the depot of the corporation in exclusion of other regular workers, we browsed through the kerala headload workers act, kerala headload workers rules and the kerala headload workers (regulation of employment and welfare) scheme, 1983 which govern the employment of headload workers in notified areas in the kerala state. ..... challenged by the regular headload workers of the kerala civil supplies corporation, kollam depot in the above said original petition, which was dismissed by the learned single judge on the ground that the authorities, after conducting an enquiry, found that members of respondents 6 and 7 unions were doing the 'attimari work' continuously and that they are registered workers under the headload workers act, which finding is a concurrent finding of fact by two authorities and there is no ground to interfere with the same under the discretionary ..... such a procedure is not contemplated by law as envisaged in the kerala headload workers act, kerala headload workers rules and the kerala headload workers (regulation of employment and welfare) scheme. ..... p3 and p5 orders of the original and appellate authorities under the kerala headload workers act, whereby the rights of respondents 6 and 7 unions to claim 'attimari work' in the kollam district depot of the kerala state civil supplies corporation was upheld. .....

Ratheesh K.R. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... issued under section 3 (1) and section 3 (2) (v) of the environment (protection) act, 1986 commonly referred to as the wp(c).no.19564/11 & con.cases 2 crz regulation dated 19.02.1991 does not apply to islands within the backwaters of the state of kerala and that the islands such as the one belonging to the ist petitioner has been brought within the coastal regulation zone only by the notification issued on 6.1.2011 (the coastal regulation zone notification, 2011); iii) in the alternative declare that the absence of any study for classification of nediyathuruth island as contemplated ..... what is stated in the no objection certificate is that the panchayat has no objection in constructing new buildings in the survey numbers owned by the two persons, since the kerala building municipal regulation act (must be the building rules) have not been enforced in the panchayat area. ..... under annexure-i of the coastal regulation zone notification .....

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in what we have already discussed above, it is abundantly clear that on the one hand there is a finding of fact determined by this court on hearing the parties on the basis of the evidence/materials placed on record in the judgment of this court in mullaperiyar environmental protection forum1 and on the other in 2006 (amendment) act, the kerala legislature has declared the dam being an endangered one and fixed the water level in the dam at 136 ft. ..... kerala legislature has imposed precautionary measures by placing pro tem restrictions on the storage level of the dams mentioned in the second schedule read with section 62a(2) of the 2006 (amendment) act and the said restrictions are based on the legislative wisdom of the kerala legislature that these dams are endangered on account of their age, degeneration, degradation, structural or other impediments. ..... on the above grounds, tamil nadu has sought two-fold relief, (i) to declare the 2006 (amendment) act passed by the kerala legislature as unconstitutional in its application to and effect on the mullaperiyar dam and (ii) to pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the first defendant from applying and enforcing the impugned legislation interfering with or obstructing the plaintiff from increasing the water level to 142 ft. ..... kerala submits that the dam suffered heavy lime loss between 1930 and 1960 forcing tamil nadu to grout admittedly 542 mt of cement in this period.183. .....

Babu.B Vs. Paravoor Municipality

Court : Kerala

..... to judge pj a.v.ramakrishna pillai, j --------------------------------------------- wpc no.10481 of 2014 --------------------------------------------- dated this the 20th day of march, 2015 judgment the action of the first respondent to set up a gas crematorium near the residence of the petitioners is under challenge in this writ petition on the ground that the action of the respondent municipality is in violation of the mandate under section 485a of the kerala municipalities act.2. ..... it is contended that the paravoor municipal secretary has reported that as per section 484 and 485(1) of the kerala municipal act, 1994, they had filed an application before the district medical officer for a no objection ..... the second respondent also filed a counter affidavit contending as follows: the secretary, paravoor municipality has filed an application before the district medical officer for no objection certificate, as per sections 484 and 485 of the kerala municipalities act, 1994 ..... the secretary, paravoor municipality reported that on the basis of the direction given by the munsiff court, paravoor in interim order as i.a.no.355/13 (o..s.no.62/13), the paravoor municipality has applied for the noc from the kerala state pollution control ..... of a crematorium by the municipality within its local limit is covered by section 485 of the kerala municipalities act. ..... section 485a of the kerala municipality act prohibits grant of license for using any place as crematorium within a distance of 50 .....

Dr. Saiful Islam Vs. University of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(2)KLT286

..... therefore, formal awarding of the degree by the senate in a convocation is only a further formality, in so far as the act and statutes do not contemplate any procedure to be followed after a resolution of the syndicate for the purpose of awarding of degree, although section 19(2)(j) of the kerala university act confers power on the senate to cancel any degree, diploma, title or any other distinction granted to any person in accordance with the provisions of the statutes. ..... in this writ petition, the bone of contention as between the petitioner and the 4th respondent is the post of reader in political science in the kerala university, which vacancy was reserved to be filled up from among the candidates belonging to muslim community, to satisfy the roster point applicable to that community. ..... it has been stated so in the kerala university act and statutes. ..... powers of the senate:- in addition to the powers conferred on the senate by the provisions of the act, the senate shall have the following powers, namely:(i) to confer degrees and other academic distinctions on persons:(a) who unless exempted therefrom in the manner prescribed, shall have pursued a prescribed course of study in a college or institution maintained by or affiliated to the university and shall have passed the prescribed examination or examinations, or(b) who shall have carried on research under prescribed conditions;(ii) to grant diplomas, titles, certificates and other academic distinctions to persons .....

Mather and Company Pvt. Ltd., Kochi, Rep. by Its Managing Director K.M ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2012(3)KLT41(SN)(C.No.43)

..... constitutional validity of the newly introduced proviso to section 8(a) (iiii) of the kerala value added tax act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as act) by the finance act 2007 (act 15/2007) published in the official gazette of the state of kerala dated 28.07.2007, taking away the benefit of the lesser rate of compounding, being availed by the petitioners with retrospective effect from 01.04.2005,is the main challenge in both the writ petitions. 2. ..... (iii) any contractor who had opted for payment of tax in accordance with the provisions of sub section (7) or sub section (7a) of section 7 of the kerala general sales tax act, 1963 in respect of any works contract prior to the date of coming into force of this act, part of which remains to be executed on such date, such contractor may continue to pay tax in respect of the transfer of goods involved in the unexecuted portion of such contracts, at the rate specified in sub section (7) or sub section (7a) of the said act. 10. ..... with reference to the substitution of the newly added proviso as per the kerala finance act, 2009, it is contended that, this will take care of the whole situation, as the benefit is intended to be given in respect of the works which commenced prior to 01.04.2008 and remains partly unexecuted as on 01.04.2008, to be mulcted with tax liability as it existed prior to 01.04.2008 till the completion of the work or upto 31.03.2009. .....

E.Ansarudeen Vs. the Tribunal for Local Govt.institution

Court : Kerala

..... he takes me through various provisions of the kerala municipality act and the kerala municipality building rules, particularly, rule 10 of the kerala municipality building rules. ..... it is also submitted that the construction undertaken by the petitioner was without the consent of the landlord, which also is violation of the kerala municipality act and rules.3. ..... therefore, i have no doubt in my mind that replacement of wooden planks by rolling shutters by the petitioner is not an activity or construction, which would require a permit either under the kerala municipality act or under the kerala municipality building rules. ..... it is also submitted by the counsel for the corporation that under section 386 of the kerala municipalioty act, no door, gate, bar or ground floor window which opens on any public street shall be constructed or reconstructed without a licence under section 366. ..... section 386 of the kerala municipality act reads thus: "386. ..... to declare that the replacement of dilapidated wooden plank doors with rolling iron shutters will not amount to construction or reconstruction as contemplated under section 2(38) of the kerala municipalities act." 2. ..... rule 10 of the kerala municipality building rules reads thus: "10. ..... in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice s.siri jagan tuesday, the 15th day of january 2013 25th pousha 193 wp(c).no. .....

Chrishty @ Christina Vs. the Chengannur Municiapality

Court : Kerala

..... it is also contended that since they were aggrieved by exhibit p3 proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent, they have challenged the same in appeal filed by them under section 509 of the kerala municipality act 1994. ..... in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice k.surendra mohan thursday, the 4th day of july 2013 13th ashadha, 1935 wp(c).no. ..... according to the said respondents, the building was inspected by the engineering division of the municipality and the report obtained is that the building is dilapidated and is required to be demolished. ..... the report of the engineer attached to the public wpc.no.3126/13 -4- works department that the 1st respondent shall obtain, would also throw light on the real condition of the building. ..... the petitioner is a stranger to the entire dispute, but claims that while she and her child were passing along the road in front of the building, a tile had fallen from the roof of the building and that they had narrowly escaped from being injured.2. ..... in view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider exhibit r4(b) appeal in accordance with law, after obtaining a report from the executive engineer of the public works department, with notice to all concerned parties and to pass final orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months of the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. .....

Kerala Public Service Commission Vs. K.n. Radhamani And Ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... as per rule 187 of the kerala co-operative societies rules, 1969 framed by the state government in exercise of power conferred on it by section 109 of the kerala co-operative societies act, 1969 (the 1969 act) for appointments to apex societies or central societies, 50% of the vacancies are required to be reserved for the employees of the member societies of the respective apex society or central society. ..... leela bhai [(2002) 3 klt sn18, a division bench of the kerala high court had sustained the stand of the kpsc that the scale of pay as on the date of recruitment should be the criteria for the purpose of determination of the qualification in terms of rule 186 (1). ..... section 109 (1) and sub-clause (2) (xv) of the kerala co-operative societies act lays down:- 109. ..... in the judgment delivered on 24th october, 2007, which is under appeal, the full bench of the kerala high court upheld the 12 contention of the in-service candidates (who were not graduates) to be considered for recruitment to the posts of clerk/cashier in different district co-operative banks. ..... a full bench of the kerala high court comprising of three hon ble judges, on reference, inter-alia, held that rule 186 of the kerala co-operative societies rules (the said rules) which prescribe the floor-level pegging of pay to rs. .....

S.T. Sadiq Vs. State of Kerala and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . based on the above decision of the supreme court, the kerala high court disposed of certain petitions pending in the high court against acquisition under the said act and directed the government to hand over the factories to the original owners.3 ..... these petitions raise questions as to the constitutional validity of the kerala cashew factories (acquisition) act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as "the said act"), which has been placed in the 9th schedule to the constitution of india, being entry 148 thereof. ..... ." a bare reading of the statement of objects of the amendment act shows that the kerala legislature wished to interfere with two judgments of the supreme court making no distinction between factories that were managed by the cashew development corporation (the 36 factories) and capex (the 10 factories) ..... . in indian nut product-vs-union of india reported in 1994 (2) klt598the supreme court had upheld the validity of the kerala cashew factories (acquisition) act, 1974 however the court declared certain notifications issued by the government under section 5(1) of the aforesaid act as null and void ..... . the statement of objects and reasons for the 1995 amendment act reads as follows:- "statement of objects and reasons the kerala cashew factories (acquisition) act, 1974 empowers the government in the public interest to acquire certain cashew factories and to provide employment to the workers who have been rendered unemployed and to secure to them just conditions of service.2 .....