Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala tolls act 1976 Court: chennai Page 7 of about 5,240 results (0.185 seconds)

G.Karthikayan Vs. the Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

..... prayerwrit petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus, forbearing the respondents and their men preventing the petitioner from transporting the crusher dust, blue metals, m.sand from tamil nadu to kerala through puliyarai check post at shencottah taluk, tirunelveli district.order1. ..... the petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking to forbear the respondents from preventing the petitioner from transporting the crusher dust, blue metals, m.sand from tamil nadu to kerala through puliyarai check post at shencottah taluk, tirunelveli district.2. ..... prohibition:- (1) no person shall transport or cause to be transported any mineral by any carrier from the place of raising or from the place of stock yard or from one place to another without having a valid transit pass. ..... , the tamil nadu prevention of illegal mining, transportation and storage of minerals and mineral dealers rules 2011, by exercising its power under section 15(1) and (1-a) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (central act 67 of 1957). ..... the tamil nadu prevention of illegal mining, transportation and storage of minerals and mineral dealers rules 2011, was framed by the tamil nadu government by exercising its power under section 15(1)(1-a) of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and rule 2(xiii) of the said rule defines minerals. .....

V.ChinnappA. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

..... on the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i find it just and reasonable to allow the criminal appeal, holding that the prosecution has not established the alleged guilt beyond reasonable doubt against the appellant / accused for convicting the appellant / accused under sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) r/w 13 (2) of prevention of corruption act, accordingly, the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant by the special judge-cum-chief judicial magistrate, thanjavur at kumbakonam in special case no.15 of 2002 is liable to be set aside, to meet the ends of justice.25. ..... mr..a.thiruvadikumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the prosecution has not established the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, in respect of demand and the alleged illegal gratification received by the appellant, however, the court below has convicted the appellant / accused and sentenced him to undergo one year ri and to pay a fine of rs.1,000/-, under section 7 of prevention of corruption act with default sentence and convicted and sentenced to undergo two years ri and to pay a fine of rs.2,000/- with default ..... state of kerala, reported in (2010) 1 mlj (crl) 995, the hon'ble supreme court has held as follows : "the legal position is no more res integra that primary requisite of an offence under section 13 (1) (d) of the act is proof of a demand or request of a valuable thing or pecuniary advantage from the public servant. .....

i.Ravichandran Vs. State

Court : Chennai

..... on that score, the order in the writ petition directing the government for reconveyance of the lands in question was set aside and the writ appeals were disposed of with a direction that the government is entitled to invoke section 16-b of the tamil nadu amendment act and on satisfying itself, it can forfeit the lands in question as penalty from the housing board and in the event the government exercises the above power and consequently the lands vests in the government, the application filed by the respondents for reconveyance under section 48b of the act shall be considered ..... when the land vests in the government then how it should be dealt with has also been considered in the said judgment following the judgment of the apex court in state of kerala vs. ..... by its secretary, housing & urban development department, chennai and others (2006 (4) ctc290) which was rendered by following the judgment of the apex court in state of kerala vs. ..... by its secretary, housing & urban development department, chennai and others (2006 (4) ctc290) which was rendered by following the judgment of the apex court in state of kerala vs. ..... by its secretary, housing & urban development department, chennai and others (2006 (4) ctc290) which was rendered by following the judgment of the apex court in state of kerala vs. ..... (state of kerala and others vs. ..... in state of kerala vs. .....

R.G.N.S.Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of the Department of Geology and ...

Court : Chennai

..... mysore state transport appellate tribunal reported in 1976 (1) scc953 at page 957, the supreme court, in the context of the rule, considered in the above case, held that, the word area in the first proviso to section 45(1) of the motor vehicles act, 1939, means the area of motorcycle roads within the territorial jurisdiction of a regional transport authority. ..... unambiguous that no transport of sand under rule 38-a of the abovesaid rules, shall be permitted across the border of tamil nadu to other states, from 1st october, 2003, transportation of sand to the state of kerala or any other state, across the border of tamil nadu, is not permissible, unless the petitioner satisfies that under the pondicherry minor mineral concession rules, 1977, the competent authority has granted any transport permit to transport sand outside the jurisdiction of the union territory of pondicherry to any other state.28. ..... -state transportation is impermissible under rule 38-b of the tamil nadu minor mineral concession rules, 1959, across the border, to other states, the contention of the petitioner that he must be permitted to transport sand to kerala, through tamil nadu borders, particularly, nilgiris district, and the present writ petition, filed for a mandamus, forbearing the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's right to carry on trade and petitioner's customer right to transport sand from puducherry to kerala and other states, with valid documents .....

N. Anandurai Vs. Divisional Excise Officer, Karur

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC40; (1998)IMLJ561

..... state of kerala and others, : [1976]3scr780 that in matters arising under the abkari act, it is notnecessary that there should be a written agreement between the parties. ..... after the death of chellammal,form no.ii notice under the revenue recovery act to recover the notional losssustained by the state was served on her legal heir namely, the writ petitioner. ..... the respondent was taking steps under the revenue recovery act, 1864 to collect the alleged arrears due by the petitioner's mother towards the kist as mentioned earlier from assets for which there was no authority of law. ..... it is contended by learned counsel for the writ petitioner that before issuing proceedings under the revenue recovery act, the writ petitioner ought to have been served with notice of demand giving an opportunity to him to dispute the quatum. ..... rule 21 of the tamil nadu arrack shops(disposal in auction) rules, 1981 empowers the excise authorities to invoke theprovisions of the revenue recovery act for the collection of notional loss. ..... the petitioner having received the notice under the revenue recovery act, has filed the present writ petition.3. ..... after her death, the writ petitioner asher son and as the beneficiary, was served with notice under the revenuerecovery act.5. ..... hewas informed that the state proposed to recover the amount from him under theprovisions of the revenue recovery act. .....

B.S. Ramappa and anr. Vs. V.B. Monappa and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1970Mad156

..... suppose however the court is to hold that the variation made by monappa is not significant enough to distinguish the mark from the founder's mark, then the court would be justified in saying that in view of sections 31 and 32 of the act of 1940 (the corresponding provisions in act xliii of 1958 being sections 39 and 40) the use of the mark of monappa could not be said to be honest within the meaning of section 10(2) of the act of 1940 or section 12 (3) of the act of 1958 and further on the same criterion monappa could not be recognised as the proprietor of the new mark. ..... if really the court could say that the variation sufficiently distinguished the mark of monappa from the founder's mark, the court would be justified in saying that the use of the new trade mark of monappa would not be likely to deceive or cause confusion and therefore the bar of sections 31 and 32 would not apply and monappa could legitimately be described as the inventor of the new mark and could be considered as the proprietor of the new mark for the purposes of sections 10 (2) and 14 of act v of 1940 (the corresponding provisions in the act of 1958 being sections .....

The Co-operative Sugars Limited Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1977]40STC195(Mad)

..... we are of the opinion that the fact that the written contract entered into between the parties provid- ed for the growers supplying sugarcane at the factory site in kerala did not in any way preclude them from coming to an understanding that in respect of the very same sugarcane contracted for, the petitioner can take delivery in the fields themselves and transport them to kerala at its own cost and deduct the cost of transportation charges from the price payable to the growers at the rate contracted for. ..... with reference to such clause the supreme court held that the performance of each one of the contracts necessarily involved the movement of the goods from the state of madhya pradesh to the state of maharashtra or to the state of andhra pradesh and the sales under the four contracts were inter-state sales under section 3(a) of the central sales tax act, 1956. ..... on these facts all the authorities came to the conclusion that the sales of the sugarcane took place in coimbatore district in tamil nadu and conse- quently the said transactions were liable to sales tax under the provisions of the tamil nadu general sales tax act, 1959, on the purchase value thereon. ..... it follows that the sales under the eight contracts were inter-state sales within the language of section 3(a) of the central sales tax act and were not liable to be taxed under the madhya pradesh general sales tax act.7. .....

Rethinasamy Vs. Komalavalli and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1982)2MLJ406

..... umma : air1974ker162 , wherein the full bench of the kerala high court has held that the limitation act, 1963, applies only to courts and prescribes periods of limitation in respect of suits, appeals and applications filed in court, that section 18 of the kerala buildings (lease and rent control) act is clear that the appellate authority constituted under it is not a court but only an authority persona designata and that, therefore, section 5 of the limitation act was not applicable to proceedings before the appellate authority. ..... to take evidence.in section 20 of the indian penal code, we find the following definition:the words 'court of justice' denote a judge, who is empowered by law to act judicially alone, or a body of judges which is empowered by law to act judicially as a body, when such judge or body of judges is acting judicially.in the absence of the definition of court in the tamil nadu act (xviii of 1960) (rent control act), and in the limitation act, the definition of court in the other enactment will help to some extent as to the intention-and purpose regarding the mention of the word 'court' in section 5 of the limitation act.16. ..... in madanlal and sons case (1976) 38 s.t.c. ..... madanlal and sons (1976) 38 s.t.c. .....

Saleem Basha Vs. Mumtaz Begum

Court : Chennai

Reported in : II(1999)DMC206

..... he may do so by words without any written order, and no particular form of words is prescribed, and no proof of intention is required and under mohammedan law the husband can declare a talaq in the absence of his wife but before it can be acted upon it must be communicated to his wife, and where the wife has come to know of the talaq given by her husband, it should be deemed to have come into effect on that day, and in a petition filed by a mohammedan wife for maintenance, it will ..... be deemed to have come into effect atleast from the date on which the written statement by the husband was filed, and the written statement filed by the husband would amount to an unequivocal expression of the desire to divorce and therefore it would operate as a divorce and the wife is not entitled to claim maintenance thereafter except for the iddat, and so the statement made by the husband in his petition of written statement amounts to the pronouncement of talaq and operates from that moment and even ..... krishna iyer of kerala high court (as he then was) in the decision reported in a. .....

K.M. Ramalinga Nadar and anr. Vs. the Collector and Addl. District Mag ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1974CriLJ1114

..... and arthur hendrose) is that all the three persons have been smuggling rice from tamil nadu to kerala state with the help of their close associates and lorry drivers and agents and therefore they have been indulging in acts prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community.13. ..... we can act on the reason behind the supreme court judgment by applying the same to the facts relating to the two detenus.16 ..... related to the year 1971, there are telling circumstances connecting them with the illicit transport of rice from tamil nadu to kerala state as stated in the grounds of ..... of 1971 of kuzhithurai police station under clause 3 of the southern states (regulations of export of rice) order 1964 read with sections 3 and 7 of the essential commodities act which ended in acquittal for want of legal evidence, respectively ..... was not directly involved in the crime, but his lorry contained 10 bags of rice which was attempted to be smuggled into kerala state from tamil nadu state ..... the respondent averred in his counter affidavit that the two detenus, arthur hendrose and haridoss are leading a joint family system of life with mutual understanding to help one another in their activities of smuggling rice, food, grains and other essential commodities from tamil nadu to kerala ..... 1971 of arumani police station under clause 3 of the southern states (regulations of export of rice) order, 1964 read with sections 3 and 7 of the essential commodities act and section 307, t. p.c. .....