Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala service inam lands vesting and enfranchisement act 1981 1 Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 6 results (0.159 seconds)

Amar Singh and anr. Vs. Dalip

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1981P& H237

..... the aforesaid observations, it becomes necessary to advert in some detail to the matrix of facts giving rise to these two appeals.the appellants amar singh and an other claiming to be owners of the land in dispute under the provisions of the punjab occupancy (vesting of proprietary rights) act, preferred a suit in the court of the assistant collector ist grade, ballabgarh on july 29, 1975, under section 77 of the punjab tenancy act seeking the ejectment of the respondents inter alia on the ground that they were small landowners and the respondents had defaulted in the payment of rent of the land ..... the definition of the term of art which the legislature advisedly used by employing the phrase 'courts of limited jurisdiction' and it accepted meaning in judicial terminology confining the phrase 'court of limited jurisdiction' again to merely civil courts could indeed be obliterating the basic distinction authoritatively laid betwixt the two equally no reference has been made to the considered view of the calcutta and the kerala high courts which so far appear to be the only direct precedents on the point ..... in opposition to the proceedings initiated before the settlement officer under section 9 question the character of the property as not falling within the description of an 'inam village', he has of necessity to decide the issue, for until he holds that this condition is satisfied, he cannot enter on the further enquiry which is the one which by section 9(1) of the act he is directed .....

Anil Sabharwal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)116PLR7

..... purpose that authority shall have the power to acquire by way of purchase, transfer, exchange or gift, hold, manage, plan, develop and mortgage or otherwise dispose of land and other property, to carry on by itself or through any agency on its behalf, building, engineering, mining and other operations, to execute works in connection with supply of water, disposal of sewerage, control of pollution and any other services and amenities and generally to do anything, with the prior approval, or on direction of the state government, for carrying out the purposes of this act.xx xx xx xxs. ..... we, therefore, reject the argument of the learned counsel for the respondents that absolute power could vest in the chief minister to make allotment of plots according to his discretion and choice and such discretion is immune from judicial scrutiny on the touch-stone of article 14 and other provisions of the constitution.nevertheless, we may reiterate that the government's powers under section 30(1) of the act to give directions to the huda to reserve plots may be used in favour of eminent professionals, outstanding sports persons, musicians etc. ..... manikoth (supra), the apex court was dealing with acquisition made under the kerala land reforms act. ..... union of india, 1980 (supp) scc 559 : (air 1981 sc 1545), while the discretion to change the policy in exercise of the executive power, when not trammelledly the statute or rule, was held to be wide, it was emphasised as imperative and implicit in art. .....

Dr. M.C. Sharma, Lecturer Vs. the Punjab University, Chandigarh and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1997P& H87

..... the cental administrative tribunal act, 1985 (for short the 'act') was enacted for adjudication and trial of disputes and complaints with respect to the requirement and conditions of service of persons appointed to public service and posts in connection with the affairs of the union or of any state or of any local or other authority within the territory of india or under the control of the government of india or under the control of the government or to any corporation owned or controlled by the government to which the act is specifically made applicable. ..... 'the supreme court also repelled the contention that rule 22a brings about the discrimination on the ground of sex alone and held that the rule can be read as a manifestation of the power vesting in the state under article 15(3). ..... nargesh mirja, (1981) 4 scc 335 : (air 1981 sc 1829) their lordships of the supreme court reiterated the view expressed in yusuf abdul aziz v. ..... union of india, air 1964 sc 179 and state of kerala v. n.m. .....

P.G.F. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2005]124CompCas201(P& H); (2004)4CompLJ288(P& H); [2004]55SCL165(Punj& Har)

..... swaika properties [1985] 3 scc 217, wherein the apex court held, that mere service of notice under section 52(2) of the rajasthan urban improvement act, 1959, on the owner at calcutta, in respect of land situated in the state of rajasthan, intimating the owners/respondents of the state government's proposal to acquire land for public purpose, did not constitute an integral part of the cause of action, sufficient to vest the calcutta high court with jurisdiction to entertain a petition under article 226 of the constitution, challenge the validity of the notification depicting the government's intention to acquire land. ..... summarised his conclusions by asserting that the activities of the pgfl pertain to a subject falling under an entry in the state list (entry 18), and therefore, are not subject to regulation at the hands of a law enacted by parliament conversely, it is reiterated that the sebi act, was enacted to regulate securities and future markets, and since the activities of the pgfl (sale and purchase of agricultural land and/or development of agricultural land) by no stretch of imagination, can be stated to fall under the said subject, the regulation of the pgfl through the board under the sebi act was clearly out of question.72. ..... tamil nadu, andhra pradesh, maharashtra, uttar pradesh, punjab, haryana, madhya pradesh, kerala, goa, rajasthan and himachal pradesh. ..... kartar krishna shashtri [1981] 1 scc 561. .....

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... (civil) 10 : (2000) 3 scc 40, having found that the restriction on transfer of land imposed vide the impugned rule and the circular was in no way meant to carry out the purpose or achieve the object of the hp ceiling on land holdings act, 1972, their lordships ruled that "a delegated power to legislate by making rules `for carrying out the purposes of the act' is a general delegation without laying down any guidelines; it cannot be so exercised as to bring into existence substantive rights or obligations or disabilities not contemplated by the provisions of the act itself." ; m. ..... .' the full bench considered the provisions contained in part-vii of the 1966 act and observed that "the territories of the successor states having been defined, if provisions vesting power with the central government were not to be made, it would have resulted into chaos as no successor state could have issued directions in the territories not specified in the said state ..... . 773 : (1995) 1 scc 468, holds that the powers of the governor under article 237 of the constitution which enables him to apply provisions of chapter-vi (subordinate courts) of the constitution and any rules made thereunder for appointment to judicial services, in relation to any class or classes of magistrates subject to such `exceptions' and `modifications' as may be prescribed in the notification, are unfettered by any restriction; (xviii) commissioner of commercial taxes, ranchi and anr. v .....

Amita Banta and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2010)157PLR413

..... it has been specifically stated 'and whereas the government having caused inquiry to be made in conformity with the provisions of the said act and being satisfied as a result of such inquiry that the acquisition of the said land is needed for the purpose referred to above has consented to the provisions of the said act being in force in order to acquire the said land for the benefit of the society members to enter in the agreement hereinafter contained with the government.but, ultimately, the lands have been acquired on behalf of the appropriate government treating the requirement of the appellant society as for a public ..... in the present case, this question does not arise as question is of change of purpose before land is vested in the state and in none of the judgments, it has been laid down that state can make a policy for releasing land acquired for a declared purpose with the real object of releasing the land from acquisition for different objectives and when such objectives neither relate to unforeseen situations nor advance the notified public purpose. ..... in such cases, it would be open to the state to employ the services of agents, provided the agents work on behalf of the state and not for themselves.17. ..... in state of kerala v. m. ..... 1981 plj 392 (p&h;) to submit that midstream change of purpose was not permissible.x) suresh verma v. .....