Court : Kerala
..... ext.r5(i): true copy of the para no.5-2-5 of the consolidated audit report for the year20012002 submitted to the kerala legislative assembly, under section23of kerala local fund audit act, 1994 and rule25of kerala local fund audit rules, ..... 9 under chapter ii thereof provides that the provisions contained in the kerala service rules, as amended from time to time shall mutatis mutandis apply to the teachers of the university with such modification as any, of the authorities of the university may make and the expression "government" appearing in those rules shall be construed as a reference to the "university". ..... 1989 issued by government of kerala, finance (pension b) department. ..... p11: true copy of g.o(p) no.369/87/fin dated313.1987 issued by government of kerala, finance (pension-b) department. ..... : ext.r5(a): true copy of para no.97 of the audit report of cusat for the year200102 (lf(cusat)a3-7/2004 dated43.2005) issued under section364) of the cusat act, 1986 and section13of kerala local fund audit act, 1994 and rule18of kerala local fund audit rules1996 ext.r5(b): true copy of order no.fin.iv/pen-r.77/2000/ugc/2001 ..... ext.r5(k): true copy of the budget speech of cusat for the financial year20112012, delivered by sri.k.anwar sadath, convenor, standing committee of the syndicate on finance and purchase, as published in page no.14 to23 in the budget estimates for20112012 of ..... true copy of letter no.17740/b2/2003/h.edn. ..... exhibits annexure-r2(a): true copy of letter no.17740/b2/2003/h.edn. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Ker)399
..... is not entitled for the benefit of section 36(1)(viii) is erroneous in law. ..... a requirement by the assessee and in view of the fact that such a requirement was made expressly clear by an amendment brought about by the finance act, 1997, we have no hesitation to hold that such a requirement made explicitly clear both by amendment to section 36(1)(viii) as well as by insertion of sub-section (4a) of section 41 of the it act, that any retrospective effect cannot be presumed to be a condition for granting the benefit as per the provisions which stood prior to the amendment in question.in the above circumstances, we hold that the decision of the tribunal holding that the assessee ..... the brief facts are - the assessee is kerala financial corporation, established under the state financial corporation act. ..... cit (2003) 182 ctr (ker) 502 - ed. ..... , 2003 are as under:18. ..... 20th june, 2003.2. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2005(2)KLT870; [2005]142STC170(Ker)
..... petitioners submit that sections 1 and 6(c) of the kerala finance act, 2001 (act 7 of 2001) is unconstitutional and violative of article 265 of the constitution of india and the unreasonable levy of compound tax on the persons engaging in metal crusher operations is contrary to articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india. ..... constitutional validity of the amendments effected to section 7(1)(b) of the kerala general sales tax act, 1963 by sections 1 and 6(c) of the kerala finance act, 2001 (act 7 of 2001) is under challenge in these cases. ..... consequently as per the kerala finance act, (act 7 of 2001) section 7(1)(b) was introduced which reads as follows:7. ..... rates were increased by the kerala finance act, 2000 with effect from 1.4.2000. ..... 1825 of 2004 was filed, petitioner has sought for a declaration that section 7(1)(c) of the kerala finance bill 2004 is illegal and unconstitutional. ..... the kerala finance bill, 2001 was published in the kerala gazette vol. ..... minister for finance in the budget speech for the year 2003-2004 stated as follows:'government have received several representations that the stone crusher industry is facing serious difficulties owing to the imposition of tax on primary crushers, especially since the product manufactured by them is not a saleable commodity. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... state commission for persons with disabilities, kerala vide its letter dated 21.3.2003, evidently, taking note of those aspects, requested the government of kerala to extend the benefit of conveyance allowance to deaf and dumb employees also and pursuant to the same, the government of kerala vide g.o. ..... the undersigned is directed to refer to ministry of finance om no.21(1)/97-e.ii(b) dated 13th june 2006 on the subject mentioned above and to state that the matter was got re-examined by the ministry by a committee of specialists in the area, which recommended the grant of special transport allowance at enhanced rate to hearing impaired personnel in view of the following reasons:-1) the disability conditions brought about by nature are the same for all disabled. ..... of finance department dated 14.6.2005 extended the benefit of conveyance allowance sanctioned as per the government orders to the government employees with hearing impaired as per the disability defined in the disabilities act. ..... in our view, the differentia sought to be canvassed by the ministry of finance has no rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the disabilities act, which envisages to give equal opportunities, protection and rights to the persons with disabilities . .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
..... xvii of the ni act are a code by itself and the very fact that the legislature specifically provided for the non-obstante clause in sections 143, 144 and 145 of ni act that those provisions were "notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973", the said provisions added on the statute book by amending act 55 of 2002 with effect from 6th february 2003 were obviously intended to give over-riding effect over section 200 of crpc which is on the statute book since the date of coming ..... keeping in view the recommendations of the standing committee on finance and other representations, it has been decided to bring out, inter alia, the following amendments in the negotiable instruments act, 1881, namely :-..... ........ ....... ..... for the same reason, reliance placed on a decision of a division bench of the kerala high court in n. ..... harihara iyer vs state of kerala, rendered on 10th december 1999 and reported in 2000 cri lj 1251 would not take the case of the accused any further.46. ..... vasudevan vs state of kerala, 2005 bglks (doc) 113 decided on 24th june 2004 and h.d.f.c. ..... srinivasa vs kashinath, (2004) cri lj 4566, kerala high court in k. ..... vasudevan vs state of kerala, 2005 bglks (doc) 113 decided on 24th june 2004 and h.d.f.c. ..... srinivasa vs kashinath, (2004) cri lj 4566, kerala high court in k. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
..... such a view in paragraph- 31 in the aforesaid decision supports the contention of the opposite parties-bank that co-operative banks are not banking companies and they having been brought under the purview of the sarfaesi act by the central government s notification dated 28.1.2003 published by the ministry of finance and company affairs in the gazette of india (extraordinary) in exercise of power conferred under section 2(1)(v) of the sarfaesi act, the co-operative bank can enforce security interest created in favour of the bank by the loanee under section 13 of the sarfaesi act. ..... sub-section (2) of section 34 of the rdb act : the provisions of this act or the rules made thereunder shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the industrial finance corporation act, 1948, the state financial corporations act, 1951, the unit trust of india act, 1963, the industrial reconstruction bank of india act, 1984 [the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 and the small industries development bank of india act, 1989].. 15. ..... the kerala state co-operative bank ltd. ..... in our view on this aspect we are supported by madhya pradesh high court, bombay high court and kerala high court in their decisions rendered in the case of hafiz zakir hussain, rama steel industries and a.p. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
..... such a view in paragraph- 31 in the aforesaid decision supports the contention of the opposite parties-bank that co-operative banks are not banking companies and they having been brought under the purview of the sarfaesi act by the central government s notification dated 28.1.2003 published by the ministry of finance and company affairs in the gazette of india (extraordinary) in exercise of power conferred under section 2(1)(v) of the sarfaesi act, the co-operative bank can enforce security interest created in favour of the bank by the loanee under section 13 of the sarfaesi act. ..... sub-section (2) of section 34 of the rdb act : the provisions of this act or the rules made thereunder shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the industrial finance corporation act, 1948, the state financial corporations act, 1951, the unit trust of india act, 1963, the industrial reconstruction bank of india act, 1984 [the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 and the small industries development bank of india act, 1989].. 15. ..... the kerala state co-operative bank ltd. ..... in our view on this aspect we are supported by madhya pradesh high court, bombay high court and kerala high court in their decisions rendered in the case of hafiz zakir hussain, rama steel industries and a.p. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
..... such a view in paragraph- 31 in the aforesaid decision supports the contention of the opposite parties-bank that co-operative banks are not banking companies and they having been brought under the purview of the sarfaesi act by the central government s notification dated 28.1.2003 published by the ministry of finance and company affairs in the gazette of india (extraordinary) in exercise of power conferred under section 2(1)(v) of the sarfaesi act, the co-operative bank can enforce security interest created in favour of the bank by the loanee under section 13 of the sarfaesi act. ..... sub-section (2) of section 34 of the rdb act : the provisions of this act or the rules made thereunder shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the industrial finance corporation act, 1948, the state financial corporations act, 1951, the unit trust of india act, 1963, the industrial reconstruction bank of india act, 1984 [the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 and the small industries development bank of india act, 1989].. 15. ..... the kerala state co-operative bank ltd. ..... in our view on this aspect we are supported by madhya pradesh high court, bombay high court and kerala high court in their decisions rendered in the case of hafiz zakir hussain, rama steel industries and a.p. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
..... such a view in paragraph- 31 in the aforesaid decision supports the contention of the opposite parties-bank that co-operative banks are not banking companies and they having been brought under the purview of the sarfaesi act by the central government s notification dated 28.1.2003 published by the ministry of finance and company affairs in the gazette of india (extraordinary) in exercise of power conferred under section 2(1)(v) of the sarfaesi act, the co-operative bank can enforce security interest created in favour of the bank by the loanee under section 13 of the sarfaesi act. ..... sub-section (2) of section 34 of the rdb act : the provisions of this act or the rules made thereunder shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the industrial finance corporation act, 1948, the state financial corporations act, 1951, the unit trust of india act, 1963, the industrial reconstruction bank of india act, 1984 [the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 and the small industries development bank of india act, 1989].. 15. ..... the kerala state co-operative bank ltd. ..... in our view on this aspect we are supported by madhya pradesh high court, bombay high court and kerala high court in their decisions rendered in the case of hafiz zakir hussain, rama steel industries and a.p. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... (c) no.25992 of 2003 in this court claiming the pension under the kerala co- operative societies employees self financing pension scheme, 1994, (hereinafter referred to as `the scheme' for short). ..... (c) 25992 of 2003 by ext.p1 judgment delivered on 19.7.2007 with a direction to the regional provident fund commissioner, employees provident fund organisation, thiruvananthapuram, to take appropriate action to transfer the employer's share of contribution, as far as the petitioner is concerned, to the kerala state co-operative employees' pension board (hereinafter referred to as the `pension board' for short) within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. ..... he thereafter unsuccessfully moved the joint registrar of co-operative societies under rule 176 of the kerala co- operative societies act, 1969. ..... while the said writ petition was pending, the state government issued a notification dated 19.6.2006 under section 17(1)(c) of the employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952, exempting primary co- operative societies in the state of kerala (the third respondent is such a society) from the operation of the employees pension scheme, 1995, with effect from 30.6.2006. .....
Tag this Judgment!