Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the indian stamp punjab amendment act 2012 Court: delhi Page 2 of about 1,286 results (0.209 seconds)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi an ...

Court : Delhi

..... by the court fees (delhi amendment) act 2012, section 26 of the court fees act was re-numbered as sub-section (1) thereof and sub-section (2) was inserted as follows:(2) for the purposes of sub-section (1), and section 25, stamp means any mark, seal or endorsement by any agency or person duly authorized by the appropriate government, and includes an adhesive or impressed stamp, for the purposes of court fee chargeable under this act. ..... xxx xxx xxx since the law made by the legislature of the state of punjab, namely, section 3 of the punjab act of 1953, is repugnant to the law made by the parliament which the parliament was competent to enact, namely, section 8(2)of the central act of 1950, the law made by the parliament must prevail and the law made by the punjab legislature has to be held to be void to the extent of the repugnancy... ..... xxx disturbed by this situation, the law commission in its 113th report recommended amendments to the indian evidence act so as to provide that in the prosecution of a police officer for an alleged offence of having caused bodily injuries to a person while in police custody, if there is evidence that the injury was caused during the period when the person was in the police custody, the court may presume that the injury was caused by the police officer having the custody of that person during that period unless, the police officer proves .....

Bhupender Singh Bhalla Vs. Neelu Bhalla @ Neelam Singh

Court : Delhi

..... taken in the instant application is based on the premise that the agreement dated 9th february 2012 was the last that was executed between the parties and the same being unregistered under section 17(1) of the registration act, 1908, the same could not be admitted in evidence as per section 49 of the registration act, and being insufficiently stamped, was liable to be impounded under section 33 of the indian stamp act, 1899 and for making it admissible in evidence, deficient court fees as also penalty as contemplated under section 35 of the indian stamp act, 1989 was liable to be paid by the plaintiff.13. ..... striking down the court fees (delhi amendment) act, 2012 as being unconstitutional, this court has held: the imposition of the court fee by percentage without a maximum limit is unrelated to the cost of any service rendered ..... the defendant filed an application under order 7 rule 11 cpc seeking rejection of plaint under clauses (b) and (c) of order 7 rule 11 cpc stating that the suit is grossly undervalued and the requisite court fees has not been paid as per court fees (delhi amendment) act, 2012. ..... thus, the plea of deficiency of court fees, as per the amendment act 2012, no longer survives ..... the application under order 7 rule 11 cpc is filed by the defendant seeking rejection of plaint, on the ground that suit has not been properly valued for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction and the requisite court fees as per the court fees (delhi amendment) act, 2012 has not been paid .....

Whirlpool India Holdings Ltd. Vs. Deputy Director of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2004)1SOT165(Delhi)

..... section 4 of the indian income tax amendment act, 1959 saved the validity of the notice.we have seen the paras of the judgment at page 106 on which the attention of the bench was drawn by the learned counsel for the department and found that these observations of the honble supreme court was applicable prior to amendment of section 143(2). ..... ito (1964) 53 itr 100 (sc), the supreme court strained and wide meaning to the word issue in order to save the income tax (amendment) act, 1959 from being rendered nugatory. ..... while holding so, the honble supreme court has discussed the amended provisions and observed that the amended provisions were applicable only after the date when they were amended therefore the ratio of the decision in the case of r.k upadhyaya (supra) is squarely applicable on the facts of the present case by which the controversy in regard to issue of notice and service of notice have been resolved. ..... attention of the bench was drawn to the copy of notice served on the assessee, which is placed at pages 38 to 40 which are duly stamped by the postal authority and indicates that the notice was served on the assessee on 3-12-2001. ..... " while holding so, the honble punjab & haryana high court has further discussed the case laws in jai hanuman trading co. .....

Laxmi College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Education ...

Court : Delhi

..... .62. during the pendency of the said writ appeals, the indian medical council (amendment) act, 1993 came into effect on 27th august, ..... parliament. applying the tests laid down by this court, it must be held that the proviso to sub-section (5) of section 5 of the medical university act which was inserted by the state act requiring prior permission of the state government for establishing a college is repugnant to section 10-a inserted in the indian medical council act, 1956 by the central act which prescribes the conditions for establishing a new medical college in the ..... . the report of the verma commission was filed, before the supreme court, in slp (c) 4247-4248/2009 supra which, vide its order dated 10th october, 2012, noted that it had carefully gone through the recommendations of the verma commission and were of the view that the same deserves to be accepted ..... . the learned asg submits that this, too, could not be treated as consent, on the part of the state of punjab, to the introduction of the two new iteps in the state ..... . (xi) the state of punjab, in its response dated 26th april, 2019, stated that at least a month s time was required, in order to take a decision on the request of the ncte, in view of the existing model code of conduct, which had been enforced preceding elections ..... . accordingly, no applications were invited, for introduction of the two new iteps, in the state of punjab ..... . lt governor11, (viii) chief settlement commissioner, rehabilitation department, punjab v .....

Manish Chandra Singh vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... provided that after the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001, no such amendment shall be made in part ii of the third schedule include any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india: to provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply to inclusion in part ii of the third schedule any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india to any person whose name is entered in the indian medical register. ..... this court is not persuaded to accept that the petitioners have any legal right to insist that the qualification as awarded by the university be entered in the indian medical register as an additional qualification against their respective names, notwithstanding that the said qualification is not a recognised medical qualification under the imc act.43. ..... it is clear from the plain language of section 26(1) of the imc act that only a recognized medical qualification can be entered in the indian medical register against the name of the medical practitioner. ..... the petitioner was admitted to the degree program with the university during the period 27.09.2010 to 07.09.2012. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... (c) 6479/2016 & other connected matters page 3 of 25 mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. .....

Dr. Gurwinder Singh vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... provided that after the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001, no such amendment shall be made in part ii of the third schedule include any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india: to provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply to inclusion in part ii of the third schedule any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india to any person whose name is entered in the indian medical register. ..... this court is not persuaded to accept that the petitioners have any legal right to insist that the qualification as awarded by the university be entered in the indian medical register as an additional qualification against their respective names, notwithstanding that the said qualification is not a recognised medical qualification under the imc act.43. ..... it is clear from the plain language of section 26(1) of the imc act that only a recognized medical qualification can be entered in the indian medical register against the name of the medical practitioner. ..... the petitioner was admitted to the degree program with the university during the period 27.09.2010 to 07.09.2012. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... (c) 6479/2016 & other connected matters page 3 of 25 mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. .....

Dr. Ojasvi Sharma & Ors vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... provided that after the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001, no such amendment shall be made in part ii of the third schedule include any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india: to provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply to inclusion in part ii of the third schedule any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india to any person whose name is entered in the indian medical register. ..... this court is not persuaded to accept that the petitioners have any legal right to insist that the qualification as awarded by the university be entered in the indian medical register as an additional qualification against their respective names, notwithstanding that the said qualification is not a recognised medical qualification under the imc act.43. ..... it is clear from the plain language of section 26(1) of the imc act that only a recognized medical qualification can be entered in the indian medical register against the name of the medical practitioner. ..... the petitioner was admitted to the degree program with the university during the period 27.09.2010 to 07.09.2012. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... (c) 6479/2016 & other connected matters page 3 of 25 mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. .....

Shruti Jain vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... provided that after the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001, no such amendment shall be made in part ii of the third schedule include any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india: to provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply to inclusion in part ii of the third schedule any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india to any person whose name is entered in the indian medical register. ..... this court is not persuaded to accept that the petitioners have any legal right to insist that the qualification as awarded by the university be entered in the indian medical register as an additional qualification against their respective names, notwithstanding that the said qualification is not a recognised medical qualification under the imc act.43. ..... it is clear from the plain language of section 26(1) of the imc act that only a recognized medical qualification can be entered in the indian medical register against the name of the medical practitioner. ..... the petitioner was admitted to the degree program with the university during the period 27.09.2010 to 07.09.2012. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... (c) 6479/2016 & other connected matters page 3 of 25 mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. .....

Dr. Mayank Sharma vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... provided that after the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001, no such amendment shall be made in part ii of the third schedule include any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india: to provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply to inclusion in part ii of the third schedule any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india to any person whose name is entered in the indian medical register. ..... this court is not persuaded to accept that the petitioners have any legal right to insist that the qualification as awarded by the university be entered in the indian medical register as an additional qualification against their respective names, notwithstanding that the said qualification is not a recognised medical qualification under the imc act.43. ..... it is clear from the plain language of section 26(1) of the imc act that only a recognized medical qualification can be entered in the indian medical register against the name of the medical practitioner. ..... the petitioner was admitted to the degree program with the university during the period 27.09.2010 to 07.09.2012. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... (c) 6479/2016 & other connected matters page 3 of 25 mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. .....

Dr Ankit Middha & Ors vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... provided that after the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001, no such amendment shall be made in part ii of the third schedule include any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india: to provided further that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply to inclusion in part ii of the third schedule any primary medical qualification granted by any medical institution outside india to any person whose name is entered in the indian medical register. ..... this court is not persuaded to accept that the petitioners have any legal right to insist that the qualification as awarded by the university be entered in the indian medical register as an additional qualification against their respective names, notwithstanding that the said qualification is not a recognised medical qualification under the imc act.43. ..... it is clear from the plain language of section 26(1) of the imc act that only a recognized medical qualification can be entered in the indian medical register against the name of the medical practitioner. ..... the petitioner was admitted to the degree program with the university during the period 27.09.2010 to 07.09.2012. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... (c) 6479/2016 & other connected matters page 3 of 25 mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. ..... mr zorawar singh, advocate for r-3/punjab medical council. .....