Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
A.M. Badar, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 9th May, 1995, passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions Case No. 338 of 1994, thereby acquitting the respondent/accused of the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC for the sake of brevity). 2. Facts projected from police report leading to the prosecution of the respondent/accused can be summarized thus:- [a] Respondent/accused Nina Tadas, is cousin uncle of Gajanan Pandurang Tadas (since deceased). According to prosecution case, there was a dispute between the family of Gajanan Tadas and respondent/accused Nina, over open land situated nearby their house leading to the filing of civil suit by Pandurang Shankar Tadas (PW-2) father of deceased Gajanan. [b] The incident in question allegedly happened on 5.9.1994 at village Harankhkeda, Taluka Bhusawal, District Jalgaon, where the parties were residing. It was day of 'POLA' festi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
1. These three applications have been filed by the applicants seeking anticipatory bail in connection with CR No.157/2010 registered at Begampura Police Station, Aurangabad for offence punishable under Sections 384, 420, 468, 504 r.w. 34 of I.P.C.2. All the three applicants herein filed bail petitions before the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Aurangabad. By order dated 11.1.2011, their applications came to be rejected. Hence, these applications seeking anticipatory bail.3. The complainant Kadari Anwar s/o Kadari Jahoor, r/o Patel Planet, Jatwada Road, Aurangabad lodged complaint dated 14.12.2010 with Begampura Police Station, Aurangabad. The English translation of the said complaint, as is supplied by the prosecution, reads thus: "Date : 14/12/2010COMPLAINT(FROM MARATHI TO ENGLISH)I, Quadri Anwar S/o Quadri Zahoor Ahmed, Age : 34 yrs Occupation- Business, R/o Patel Planet Jatwada Road, Aurangabad lodge complaint before the P.S. Begampura. I reside along with my family at above mentioned ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
:1. This appeal is filed by the appellant/State challenging the judgment and order dated 31st May, 1999 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Paithan, Dist. Aurangabad in Regular Criminal Case No. 47 of 1996, thereby acquitting the accused/respondents from commission of crime U/Sec. 452, 326, 324, 323, 504 and 506 r/w Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are as under : The complainant Gangadhar @ Bhaurao Thorat is resident of village Muddalwadi, Tq. Paithan. In the year 1991 he sold the land of his son to the son of accused No. 1 Tatyaba. At that time there was encumbrance on the said land and land was indebted to society and Land Development Bank. One Ankush Jadhav was chairman of the said Society. On 09.04.1996 in the morning said Chairman approached the complainant and informed that accused No. 1 was insisting to refund the amount to him (accused No. 1) which amount was deducted from the payment of sugarcane of accused No. 1. Chairman...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
1 This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and order dated 30.10.1999 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani in Sessions Trial No. 137 of 1994 thereby convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 325 of I.P.C. and sentenced him to suffer R.I. for three years and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/- i.d to suffer R.I. for six months.2 The prosecution case, in brief, is as under;- The appellant-accused as well as deceased Mukinda are residents of Keli Tanda, Taluka Jintoor. Father of appellant is the maternal uncle of deceased Mukinda. On 24.7.1994 Guja, father of appellant requested a 'Naik' of the village to organize a meeting of panchas for the separation of the family members. All sons of Guja had already separated and were residing in the respective rooms of the said house, whereas said Guja was residing alongwith his wife. In the said meeting, Guja had decided even to be separated from is wife. When the meeting was concluded, the sons of Guja, who ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
: 1] Both the Appeal are filed against judgment and order of Sessions Case No.126/2006 which is decided by Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar Shri M.G.Shevalikar.2] The first appeal is filed by original accused no.1 Shri Narayan Waghmode as he is convicted and sentenced for offence punishable under Section 489A of I.P.C. The second appeal is filed by the State against all the original accused as the trial Court has not convicted accused nos.1,3,10,11,12 and 13 for offence of criminal conspiracy punishable under Section 120B of I.P.C. and as the trial Court acquitted the remaining accused. Accused Nos.3,10,11,12 and 13 are convicted for the offence punishable under Section 489B of I.P.C. 3] The facts leading to the institution of these 2 appeals can be stated in brief as below :Police Inspector Shri Mallesh was attached to L.C.B. Ahmednagar. On 13/5/2006, he received information from his informer against accused No.1 Narayan Waghmode that Waghmode was living as a tenant in the house...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
1. The appeal is filed against judgment and decree of Regular Civil Appeal No. 27/2003, which was pending in the Court of Ad-hoc District Judge-5, Nanded. The appeal filed by present respondents/original plaintiffs against the judgment and decree of Regular Civil Suit No. 75/2001, which was pending in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kinwat is allowed by the First Appellate Court and the suit is decreed in favour of plaintiffs. Both the sides are heard. 2. R.C.S. No. 75/2001 was filed in respect of land Gat Nos. 57, 58 and 59 situated at village Murli. Relief was claimed for declaration of a document of Will executed in favour of one Keshav Bhaware as null and void. Declaration was claimed that aforesaid three properties belong to plaintiffs and relief of possession of these properties was also claimed. 3. It is the case of plaintiffs that one Sambhaji Bhaware was owner of aforesaid lands. It is contended that Sambhaji had a son by name Thakaji and one daughter by name Vithab...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
1. The appeal is filed against judgment and decree of Regular Civil Appeal No. 116/1984 which was pending in District Court, Aurangabad. The appeal of present respondents, original defendants filed against judgment and decree of Special Civil Suit No. 51/1980 is allowed by the District Court and the decree given by the Trial Court of specific performance of contract is set aside. The original plaintiff has filed the present appeal. Both the sides are heard. 2. Two agricultural lands like land bearing Survey No. 18, admeasuring 12 Acre 1 Gunta and Survey No. 14, admeasuring 19 Acres 8 Gunta situated at village Maosala, Tahsil Khultabad, District Aurangabad were owned by Sandu Baig. Land Survey No. 14 is also known as Godhya Ambacha Inam. Sandu is dead and defendants are the successors of Sandu. 3. It is the case of plaintiff appellant - Kashinath that Sandu was in need of money and so, he expressed to plaintiff that he wanted to sell aforesaid two lands. It is the case of plaintiff that...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
1. The appeal is filed against judgment and decree of Special Civil Suit No.130/1974, which was pending in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar and also against the judgment and decree of Regular Civil Appeal No.35/2001, which was pending in the District Court, Ahmednagar. The suit filed by Premsukh for relief of partition and separate possession of his share from Joint Hindu Family properties is decreed in his favour. Both the sides are heard. 2. The facts, leading to the institution of the appeal, can be stated in brief as follows :- One Ramdayal was the father of plaintiff. Nandlal was also son of Ramdayal and he was the father of defendant No.1 - Madanlal. Defendant Nos.2 and 3 are sons of defendant No.1. 3. It is the case of plaintiff Premsukh that he and defendant No.1 were doing business under the name and style as 'M/s. Ramdayal Nandlal' at Ahmednagar and this was the business of Joint Hindu Family consisting of plaintiff and Nandlal. It is contended that only ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
V.M. Deshpande, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard with consent of both the parties. 2. By the present Criminal Application, the Applicant is seeking quashing of First Information Report bearing CR No.I 124/2012, dated 3rd November, 2012, registered with Satara Police Station, Aurangabad for the offences punishable U/Section.s. 109, 114, 120(B), 468, 471, 419, 420, 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, to the extent of present Applicant only. 3. Few facts leading to the present Criminal Application can conveniently be narrated as under:- [i] Non-Applicant No.3 “ Sow. Mangala w/o Kamlakar Yelnoorkar lodged a report with Satara Police Station, Aurangabad, stating five persons have committed the offences, as enumerated in the said First Information Report. The present Applicant is shown as Accused No.2 in the said report. [ii] Non-Applicant No.3 Sow. Mangala is the citizen of Great Britain. She resides there since last 36 years. Her brother Sharad Nandedkar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
1. The proceeding is filed to challenge the order made by Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur District Ahmednagar on Exh. 23 in Sessions Case No. 03/2009. The application was filed by applicants for discharge. The charge sheet is filed against them for offences punishable under section 306, 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and for offences punishable under section 32, 33(a), (b) of Bombay Money Lending Act. 2. The application is rejected by Sessions Court. Both the sides are heard. Copies of papers of investigation were made available to this Court. 3. Crime is registered on the basis of the report given by one Smt. Arti. Deceased Anil was her husband. He committed suicide by hanging himself in his house on 03/08/2009. It is the case of his widow that there was some money lending transaction between the applicants and the deceased and the applicants were harassing the deceased due to the transaction. It is her case that some document in respect of the land of the dec...
Tag this Judgment!