Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the himachal pradesh police act 2007 Page 6 of about 89,132 results (1.033 seconds)

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Darshan Singh and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... complainant used to get apples from himachal pradesh for sale in the city. ..... contended that the acceptance of ` 5,000/- by the accused cannot be considered to be as part payment of the market fee because the market fee can only be deposited in the office of the municipal committee and there is no provision in the act, rules and bye laws to collect the market fee in cash from the business premises of the commission agents, secondly, the market fee can only be ascertained on counting of the sale which is to be reflected in form-m and the market fee has to be deposited on the basis of the form-m which has.to be submitted simultaneously in the office of the market ..... committee and in this case there is no form-m and thirdly he contended that there can be no part payment of the market fee ..... prosecution story, in brief, is that on 28.9.2007, complainant aman sood moved an application before the senior superintendent of police, central bureau of investigation alleging therein that he was running the business of commission agent at chandigarh. .....

Shanmugam and anr. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police,t.Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... state of tamil nadu (1972) crl.lj 1296.state of himachal pradesh v. ..... the police swung into action, conducted an inquest and seized the stick and stones used by the accused persons for the assault and the blood stained clothes of the deceased. ..... (2011) 10 scc 15.where this court observed: (i) while appreciating the evidence of witness considering him as the interested witness, the court must bear in mind that the term 'interested' postulates that the witness must have some direct interest in having the accused somehow or the other convicted for some other reason. ..... for the time being, we are concerned with four categories of witnesses - a third party disinterested and unrelated witness (such as a bystander or passer-by); a third party interested witness (such as a trap witness); a related and therefore an interested witness (such as the wife of the victim) having an interest in seeing that the accused is punished; a related and therefore an interested witness (such as the wife or brother of the victim) having an interest in seeing the accused punished and also having some enmity with the accused. ..... (ii) this court has consistently held that as a general rule the court can and may act on the testimony of a single witness provided he is wholly reliable. ..... state of maharashtra (2007) 14 scc 150.and bipin kumar mondal v. ..... state of maharashtra (2007) 2 scc 170.kilakkatha parambath sasi and ors. v. .....

P Umesh Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... state of himachal pradesh and others reported in 1987 sc1239with regard to notified area, prior opportunity of hearing of residents of the locality must be afforded.12. ..... that the contention of the petitioners that the reservation was made to a particular category for the years 2001, 2007 and 2013 cannot be accepted for the simple reason that the elections conducted for the 18 years 2007 and 2013 were on the basis of 2001 census and in sofaras shivamogga city municipal council that the city municipal council, shivamogga was upgraded as municipal corporation and the notification was issued on the basis of 2011 census, the starting point for both the elections under the impugned notification is on the ..... sub-section (2) of section 7 of the act prescribes that the seats shall be reserved in a corporation for the scheduled castes and for the scheduled tribes and the number of seats so reserved shall be as nearly as may be, the same proportion to the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in the corporation as the population of the scheduled castes in the city or of the scheduled tribes in the city bears to the total population of the city. .....

Constable 3461 Baliram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC230

..... of himachal pradesh and ors ..... , 736/2005, 729/2005 and 653/2005) in order to save himself from the criminal liability, as he was an accused in the criminal case registered by the police in respect of the incident of death of constable late rajesh kumar tiwari. ..... act and 3/4, prevention of damage to the public property act was registered at police station ram janma bhumi, faizabad against the petitioners and other ..... only on the basis of the statement of vikas srivastava, company commander, who had recorded his statement before the enquiry officer naming the petitioners and other constables to be involved in demonstrations and gherao of the vehicle carrying the dead body of late constable rajesh kumar tiwari, which action of the petitioners according to him created law and order problem on the spot, the petitioners were ..... natural that due to death of a colleague, the atmosphere was highly surcharged with emotions and if any act was done by the petitioners in that atmosphere after seeing the dead body of their colleague, it could not be defined as misconduct and such act could have been pardoned taking into account past work, conduct and performance of the petitioners, which always remained satisfactory. ..... tribunal has also taken note of these facts in its judgment rendered on 20.12.2007, a copy of which has been annexed as annexure-13 to the writ petition, and directed for reinstatement of four constables in service.10. ..... 2007 sccl com 1235; bharat ..... tribunal, rendered on 20.12.2007. .....

C. Suresh Vs. India Cements Capital And Finance Limited Chennai repres ...

Court : Kerala

..... uttar pradesh electronics corporation limited (air 2007 sc 2961) the supreme court has observed that one of the main objectives of the act is to minimise the supervisory role of courts in arbitral process. ..... take a case in which the award is passed in the state of himachal pradesh, the court having jurisdiction over the subject matter is in west bengal and the debtor has property or resides at a place in kerala. ..... months it may entertain the application within a further period of thirty days, but ..... section 34(3) of the act provides that an application for setting aside an arbitral award may not be made after three months have elapsed from the date on which the party making that application had received the arbitral award or, if a request had been made under section 33, from the date on which that request had been disposed of by the arbitral tribunal: provided that if the court is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application within the said period of three .....

Mazid Vs. Smt. Raj Kunwar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2009(3)WLN202

..... : 1999 acj 1 and the decision of himachal pradesh high court in case of united india insurance co ..... from the said decisions, is: (i) the liability of the insurance company in a case of this nature is not extended to a pillion rider of the motor vehicle unless the requisite amount of premium is paid for covering his/her risk (ii) the the legal obligation arising under section 147 of the act cannot be extended to an injury or death of the owner of vehicle or the pillion rider; (iii) the pillion rider in a two wheeler was not to be treated as a third party when the accident has taken place owning to rash and negligent riding of the ..... scooter and not on the part of the ..... : 2007 acj 1398, and submitted that the said deceased bhim singh could not be said to be the owner of the goods accompanying along with the goods in vehicle as admittedly the goods in question had been emptied at bhilwara and empty truck was returning back from the said place while it met with the said accident .....

Birender Singh Yadav vs.c B I

Court : Delhi

..... bhari air1956sc44 prakash singh badal vs union of india 16 (2007) 1 scc1 state of himachal pradesh vs nishant sareen crl.a. ..... 01.02.2017 and order on framing of charges dated 10.02.2017 passed by special judge, central bureau of investigation (01) (hereinafter referred as cbi ), the prevention of corruption act, 1988(hereinafter referred to pc act ), tis hazari courts, delhi, under section 120-b r/w sections 420,471, 477a of the indian penal code,1860 (hereinafter referred as ipc ) & section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the pc act,1988 and substantive offences punishable under section 420,471 read with section 465, 477a ipc in case titled ..... , and this court expressed the following view: and the jurisdiction of a magistrate to take cognizance of any offence is provided by section 190 of the code, either on receipt of a complaint, or upon a police report or upon information received from any person other crl.m.c. ..... it embraces within itself all powers and authority in exercise of jurisdiction and taking of authoritative notice of the allegations made in the complaint or a police report or any information received that an offence has been committed. ..... 849/2017 & connected matters page 10 of 15 to whom the persons than a police officer, or upon his knowledge that such offence has been committed. .....

Ravinder Singh vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... bhari air1956sc44 prakash singh badal vs union of india 16 (2007) 1 scc1 state of himachal pradesh vs nishant sareen crl.a. ..... 01.02.2017 and order on framing of charges dated 10.02.2017 passed by special judge, central bureau of investigation (01) (hereinafter referred as cbi ), the prevention of corruption act, 1988(hereinafter referred to pc act ), tis hazari courts, delhi, under section 120-b r/w sections 420,471, 477a of the indian penal code,1860 (hereinafter referred as ipc ) & section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the pc act,1988 and substantive offences punishable under section 420,471 read with section 465, 477a ipc in case titled ..... , and this court expressed the following view: and the jurisdiction of a magistrate to take cognizance of any offence is provided by section 190 of the code, either on receipt of a complaint, or upon a police report or upon information received from any person other crl.m.c. ..... it embraces within itself all powers and authority in exercise of jurisdiction and taking of authoritative notice of the allegations made in the complaint or a police report or any information received that an offence has been committed. ..... 849/2017 & connected matters page 10 of 15 to whom the persons than a police officer, or upon his knowledge that such offence has been committed. .....

Sushil Kumar Jain vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... bhari air1956sc44 prakash singh badal vs union of india 16 (2007) 1 scc1 state of himachal pradesh vs nishant sareen crl.a. ..... 01.02.2017 and order on framing of charges dated 10.02.2017 passed by special judge, central bureau of investigation (01) (hereinafter referred as cbi ), the prevention of corruption act, 1988(hereinafter referred to pc act ), tis hazari courts, delhi, under section 120-b r/w sections 420,471, 477a of the indian penal code,1860 (hereinafter referred as ipc ) & section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the pc act,1988 and substantive offences punishable under section 420,471 read with section 465, 477a ipc in case titled ..... , and this court expressed the following view: and the jurisdiction of a magistrate to take cognizance of any offence is provided by section 190 of the code, either on receipt of a complaint, or upon a police report or upon information received from any person other crl.m.c. ..... it embraces within itself all powers and authority in exercise of jurisdiction and taking of authoritative notice of the allegations made in the complaint or a police report or any information received that an offence has been committed. ..... 849/2017 & connected matters page 10 of 15 to whom the persons than a police officer, or upon his knowledge that such offence has been committed. .....

Mukesh Kumar vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... bhari air1956sc44 prakash singh badal vs union of india 16 (2007) 1 scc1 state of himachal pradesh vs nishant sareen crl.a. ..... 01.02.2017 and order on framing of charges dated 10.02.2017 passed by special judge, central bureau of investigation (01) (hereinafter referred as cbi ), the prevention of corruption act, 1988(hereinafter referred to pc act ), tis hazari courts, delhi, under section 120-b r/w sections 420,471, 477a of the indian penal code,1860 (hereinafter referred as ipc ) & section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the pc act,1988 and substantive offences punishable under section 420,471 read with section 465, 477a ipc in case titled ..... , and this court expressed the following view: and the jurisdiction of a magistrate to take cognizance of any offence is provided by section 190 of the code, either on receipt of a complaint, or upon a police report or upon information received from any person other crl.m.c. ..... it embraces within itself all powers and authority in exercise of jurisdiction and taking of authoritative notice of the allegations made in the complaint or a police report or any information received that an offence has been committed. ..... 849/2017 & connected matters page 10 of 15 to whom the persons than a police officer, or upon his knowledge that such offence has been committed. .....