Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2009SC2750; 2010(1)BomCR463; JT2009(10)SC157; 2009(10)SCALE148; (2009)8SCC235; (2009)24VST552(SC); 2009AIRSCW5189
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.Introduction:2. Doctrine of unjust enrichment, as opposed to doctrine of retention, is the core question involved herein. It arises out of a judgment and order dated 21.10.2008 passed by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 22 of 2006.Background facts:3. Respondent is a company registered and incorporated under the Companies Act. It inter alia is engaged in the business of operating a multiplex theatre, commonly known as Fame Adlabs in the town of Mumbai for screening of films in the said theatre. Indisputably, the provisions of the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 (for short 'the Act') are applicable to the said multiplex theatre. The State of Maharashtra, however, adopted a policy decision to provide certain exemptions in the matter of payment of entertainment duties. Entertainment duty is payable at the rate of 45% on payment for admission by the proprietors so far as the multiplex theatres constituted within the limits of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
J.S. Khehar, C.J.1. After the decision of the Union Cabinet dated 02.11.2000, whereby 'Direct-to-Home' (DTH) broadcasting was permitted in India, prohibition on the reception and distribution of television signals in Ku Band was withdrawn by the Department of Telecommunications, through a notification dated 09.01.2001. In order to give effect to the decision of the Cabinet, as also, the notification issued by the Department of Telecommunications, referred to above, guidelines dated 15.03.2001 were issued laying down the procedure for obtaining licences for providing 'Direct-to-Home' (DTH) broadcasting service in India on 15.03.2001. In the aforesaid guidelines, the conditions of eligibility were also prescribed.2. In so far as the procedural aspect of the matter is concerned, interested parties were to be required to submit an application to the Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. If the applicant was found eligible (for setting up a 'Direct-to-Home' (DTH) platform in ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. 06.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Writ Petition Nos.29398 of 2010, 482, 483, 1361, 7887, 17245, 28040 of 2011 231, 832, 2138, 2947, 3144, 4904, 5777, 5900, 5902, 5904, 5906, 6220, 31291 of 2012 1676, 1777, 3362, 6575, 15259, 16461 and 17223 of 2013 W.P.No.29398 of 2010: -------------------- M/s.AGS Entertainment Private Limited, Flat No.B-2, First Floor, Shoba Flats, No.12, 10th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-600 083 rep. by its Director. .. Petitioner vs. 1.Union of India, Secretary Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 2.The Central Board of Excise and Customs, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 3.The Commissioner of Service Tax, MHU Complex, No.692, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. .. Respondents W.P.No.482 of 2011: ------------------ Ananda Pictures Circuit rep. by its Proprietor L.Suresh, 4th Floor, Raheja Complex, 834, Anna ...
Tag this Judgment!