Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the cochin makkathayam thiyya act 1940 Court: mumbai goa Page 1 of about 3 results (0.048 seconds)

Jan 21 2014 (HC)

State of Goa Vs. M/S. Shivani Laboratories and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... jyoti sardessai, had lodged the complaint before the judicial magistrate first class, at margao against five accused persons for contravention of the provision of section 18(a)(i) punishable under section 27(c) of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 ('the act', for short), which came to be registered as criminal case no. ..... it is observed that section 34 of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 contains a similar provision making every person in charge of and responsible to the company for the conduct of its business liable for the offence committed by a company. ..... been committed by a company, every person who at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly: provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any punishment provided in this act if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2014 (HC)

State of Goa Vs. M/s. Shivani Laboratories and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... bhise, had lodged the complaint before the judicial magistrate first class, at mapusa against five accused persons for offences under section 18(a)(i) read with section 16(1)(a), sub-section (c) of section 17 and subsection (d) of section 17-b, punishable under section 27(c) of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 ('the act', for short), which came to be registered as o. a. ..... it is observed that section 34 of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 contains a similar provision making every person in charge of and responsible to the company for the conduct of its business liable for the offence committed by a company. ..... been committed by a company, every person who at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly: provided that nothing contained in this sub- section shall render any such person liable to any punishment provided in this act if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2015 (HC)

The Goa Foundation and Another Vs. The North Goa Planning and Developm ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... considering the said aspects in the present case, we find that while examining the environmental aspect for the project of the respondent no.7, though the provisions of crz notification of 1991 were in fact clearly noted, the respondent no.3 chose to direct the concerned department to change the distance of the no development zone and make changes in the plan though the notification itself provided that until the coastal management plan is approved by the central government, all the restrictions imposed under the crz notification of 1991 have to be complied with. ..... in which this court held that there should be no judicial tolerance of illegal and unauthorized constructions by those who treat the law to be their subservient, but are happy to note that the functionaries and officers of kolkata municipal corporation (for short, the corporation ) have been extremely vigilant and taken steps for enforcing the provisions of the kolkata municipal corporation act, 1980 (for short, the 1980 act ) and the rules framed thereunder for demolition of illegal construction raised by respondent no.7. ..... ................in crawford on statutory construction (1940 edn. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //