Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh visdwavidyalaya sanshodhan adhiniyam 2005 Court: mumbai Page 6 of about 109 results (0.036 seconds)

E.S. Sanjeeva Rao Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation)(C.B.i.), Mumbai ...

Court : Mumbai

..... under:- questionsfindings(i) whether the regional providentfund commissioner while passing an order under section 7a is a judge within the definition under section 19 of the ipc and section 2 of the judges (protection) act, 1985?in the affirmative(ii) whether the averments madein the fir even if they are taken at its face value, constitute an offence?in the negative(iii) whether the prosecution of thepetitioner only on the basis of the order passed under section 7a is barred in view of section 77 of the indian penal code or section 3(1) of the judges (protection) act, ..... fell for consideration before the full bench was : whether sanction of the central government under section 197(1) of the code of criminal procedure is a condition precedent for court to take cognizance of the offence alleged in the private complaint against the judge of the high court in respect of his acts in the discharge of judicial functions and, in this context, full bench held that so far as the judges of the high court and supreme court are concerned the central government or the state government had ..... in the complaint, it is stated that the petitioner knowingly did not calculate the epf dues which alongwith the damages @ 100% should have come to approximately rs 43,52,67,618/- for the period of 2004 to 2005 and 2008 ..... appointed as assistant provident fund commissioner in the year 1997 and was later on promoted to the post of regional provident fund commissioner on 03/02/2005 with effect from 23/10/2003. 4. .....

Dr. Pragji Savji Vaja and Others Vs. Dr. Chhotalal Narsidas Parmar and ...

Court : Mumbai

..... petition no.4 of 2000 which was decided by the learned single judge on 1st april, 2005 which is reported in 2005(2) mlj 1135, wherein also the learned single judge relying on the aforesaid judgment of the honble supreme court in the case of raje anandrao (supra) holding that this court has jurisdiction to entertain such a petition for sanction of a scheme. 5. ..... lavajibhai ratanjibhai and others, (2005) 10 supreme court cases 760 in support of the submission that there is bar on civil court under section 80 of the bombay public trust act, 1950 to decide or deal with any question which has to be decided or dealt with by the charity commissioner or any authority under the provisions of bombay public trust act, 1950. ..... however, when the scheme was sanctioned by this honble court by its order dated 1.4.2005, the wording of the order seems to suggest that even as a trustee whose term of office has not expired must resign prematurely as soon as he completed 21 years in office. ..... g) the last of amendments to the scheme were s anctioned on 01/04/2005 (formally on 21/08/2006). .....

Official Trustee, State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Housing and Are ...

Court : Mumbai

..... into such arrangements and agreement as our attorney may deem fit for the purpose of obtaining consent from the tenants and occupants in occupation of the structure on the said property for the purpose of repair and reconstruction of the tenants structures and for obtaining the development right certificates in respect of the balance fsi available in respect of the said property, with the prior approval of the official trustee, maharashtra state and at the entire risk, cost and expense of the said attorney." 13. ..... even the municipal corporation in its letter dated 31-12- 2005 addressed to the principal secretary, urban development department, government of maharashtra, had expressed the view that the application made by the appellants for construction of a luxury hotel with additional fsi under the dc rules, 1967 be granted under rule 10(2) of the rules. ............ ..... by a letter dated 14th june, 2006, informed the developer that the stay on the noc earlier granted by it on 2nd april, 2004, was vacated in view of the order dated 10th october, 2005 of the division bench. ..... the developer by its letter dated 1st december, 2005, forwarded copies of the order in trust petition no.5 of 2004 to mhada and requested mhada in the light thereof to further process its applications and to vacate the stay on the noc granted earlier by mbrandrb. ..... appeal no.713 of 2005, filed by the official trustee was dismissed by an order and judgment of a division bench of this court dated 10th october, 2005. .....

Llalubhai Amichand Ltd. Vs. Akruti Nirman Ltd. and ors. and Pandya and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(5)BomCR793

..... 2,00,00,000/ by the plaintiff from the respondent, this hon'ble court be pleased to certify the same on the decree dated 7th july, 2005/11th july, 2005;(h) that upon quiet, vacant and peaceful possession of service industry land being handed over to the plaintiff, this hon'ble court be pleased to certify compliance of the decree dated 7th july, 2005/11th july, 2005 in so far as respondent no. ..... in fact, possession of the property was already with the mmrda on 11.8.2004 and therefore the plaintiff would have been entitled to interest immediately upon the modification, which was agreed to in december, 2005 itself as is evident inter alia from the letter dated 19.12.2005 addressed by the plaintiff to defendant nos. ..... by a letter dated 30.12.2005, mmrda informed the plaintiff that it intended taking over the land reserved for amenity space and additional recreation place against the tdr in accordance with the government order dated 2.4.2005 and with the approval of the government of maharashtra.14. ..... 2,00,00,000/ to the plaintiff upon proof of possession of the amenity space and additional recreation ground;(b) that the adjustment and/or modification and/or variation of the decree dated 7th july, 2005 and 11th july, 2005 as per prayer (a) above or to such extent as may be declared by this hon'ble court be certified on decree dated 7th july, 2005 and 11th july, 2005 passed in suit no. .....

Hsbc Pi Holdings (Mauritius) Limited Vs. Avitel Post Studioz Limited a ...

Court : Mumbai

..... xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx (1) the proper law of the arbitration agreement governs the validity of the arbitration agreement, the question whether a dispute lies within the scope of the arbitration agreement; the validity of the notice of arbitration; the constitution of the tribunal; the question whether an award lies within the jurisdiction of the arbitrator; the formal validity of the award; the question whether the parties have been discharged from any obligation to arbitrate future disputes ..... as already stated since the suit has been filed for declaration to declare that the revision petitioner is not a partner with effect from 18.11.2005, and for consequential injunction restraining the petitioner from disturbing the smooth functioning of the first respondent firm, the issue relates to the causes which compelled the respondents to expel the revision petitioner from the partnership firm and the necessity to reconstitute the firm by entering into a fresh partnership ..... kumar and another reported in (2005) 1 scc 787 in support of his submission that there is absolute bar in relation to issues which are already decided between the parties from agitating the same in the later proceedings between the same parties. ..... it was his contention that the partnership deed dated 6th of december, 2005 was not a valid one as it was not framed in compliance with the requirements under the partnership act. ..... collector and another reported in (2005) 7 scc 190 on the issue of estoppel raised by the petitioner. .....

Dighi Koli Samaj Mumbai Rahivasi Sangh (Regd.) Through Its Secretary S ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR97; 2009(111)BomLR2842

..... according to the petitioner, they came to know of the clearance of year 2005 and could receive the documents through gram panchayat only in the year 2007 where after they made representation, took out public morchas and thereafter have approached the court. ..... in the impugned clearance dated 30th september, 2005, the company was directed to take socioeconomic development and welfare measures and besides that in relation to the matters involving water in the crz area and otherwise, the following conditions were imposed. ..... 6 by the additional director government of india, ministry of environment and forest vide letter dated 26th december 2005 and the substituted condition reads as under:(xvii) reclamation within the port area shall be carried out (+) 5 metre level from the existing ground level. ..... various protests raised by the petitioners inviting attention of the authorities but could not persuade the authority to act and/or withdraw the clearance granted on 30th september, 2005. ..... noncompliance to this statutory aspect would vitiate the notification dated 30th september, 2005;(b) various conditions for granting of sanction accorded are otherwise not in public interest and have been permitted in favour of respondent no. .....

Nagpur Shikshan Mandal, Through Its Secretary and Another Vs. Varsha V ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... in terms of the policy of the state government incorporated in the government resolution dated 10-6-2005, the respondent no.1 was required to be absorbed in the vacancy of mr. ..... as per the scheme of shikshan sevak, contained in para 9 of the government resolution dated 10-6-2005, which is incorporated under section 5 of the meps act, such a teacher needs to be absorbed as a full time teacher on availability of such a post in the concerned subject. ..... it is submitted that as per clause 13 of the government letter dated 10th june, 2005 the part time teacher does not possess any status of permanency and also they does not have any right of service protection and other benefits of permanent teachers. ..... it is surprising how the deputy director of education has taken a contrary stand in his affidavit dated 15-4-2014, which is also not in conformity with the government resolution dated 10-6-2005, referred therein. ..... the government resolution dated 10-6-2005 is in respect of implementation of the revised scheme of shikshan sevak in private aided secondary/higher secondary schools, junior colleges, b.ed. ..... the reliance is placed upon the government resolution dated 10-6-2005. 14. ..... clause 9 under the government resolution dated 10-6-2005 is in marathi. .....

Rahul and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Urba ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... is also the contention of the learned senior counsel for the petitioners that the two contractors-shashikant bambal and shri bhakte, oth submitted affidavits to the effect that the latter would have no objection if the works allotted to him were carried out by the former and the former would have no objection in accepting the payments for the works done by him at the rate quoted by the latter which were some what lower than the rates quoted by the former. ..... provision of section 72 is yet to take effect and it would take effect only when the rules regulating exercise of financial powers by the standing committee or the council would be framed by the state government and till the time such rules are framed, the standing committee or the council would continue to be governed by the old provision which prescribes the limit of rs.40,000/- for sanctioning execution of works relating to construction of road, bridge, building or water supply or drainage without obtaining any prior technical ..... since the performance of its functions by the municipal council of the petitioners, the earlier discussion has shown, must be regulated one way or the other and since no such regulation by prescribing the suitable terms and conditions has been put in place by the municipal council, katol, the principle of rule of law would demand that the municipal council abides by the executive directions of the state government and the guidelines contained in such instruments as the standing order ..... (2005) 8 scc .....

Mahadeo and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Dep ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... of pay of laboratory assistants as non-teaching staff of private colleges shall be on a par with the government employees and this court held that even though there were no statutory rules, the laboratory assistants as non-teaching staff of private college were entitled to the parity of the pay scales as per the executive instructions of the government and the writ jurisdiction of the high court under article 226 of the constitution is wide enough to issue a writ for payment of pay on a par with government employees ..... as per the reference order, the constitution bench had to decide on the validity of clause (5) of article 15 of the constitution inserted by the constitution (ninety-third amendment) act, 2005 with effect from 20.01.2006 and on the validity of article 21a of the constitution inserted by the constitution (eighty-sixth amendment) act, 2002 with effect from 01.04.2010. ..... hon'ble constitution bench holds that none of the rights under articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the constitution have been abrogated by clause (5) of article 15 of the constitution and that the (ninety-third amendment) act, 2005 of the constitution inserting clause (5) of article 15 of the constitution is valid. .....

Sadashiv Krishna Sutar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

..... having regard to the object of the 1988 act as indicated in the statement of objects and reasons, namely, to widen the scope of the definition of the expression "public servant", which is sought to be achieved by introducing the definition of "public duty" in section 2(b) and the definition of 'public servant' in section 2(c) which enlarges the scope of the existing definition of public servant contained in section 21 ipc, we do not find any justification for restricting the scope of the wide words used in sub-clause (viii) of section 2(c) in the 1988 act on the basis of the statement of the minister so as to exclude members ..... - (a) to institute and defend any suit and other legal proceedings, civil or criminal, on behalf of the society, in the name of his office; (b) to carry on the business of the society, so far as may be necessary for the beneficial winding up of the same; (c) to sell immovable and movable property and actionable claims of the society by public auction or private contract, with power to transfer the whole or part thereof to any person or body corporate, or sell the same in parcels; [(c-i) to transfer by sale assets valued at market price to a society registered with ..... state of chhattisgarh and others (2007) 3 scale 341]. 31. mr. ..... reported in 2005 (5) scc 632]. 12. ..... his request was granted and he retired on 10th june, 2005. 34. .....