Court : Delhi
..... . state (decision dated 12th may 2009 in crl.a.228 of 2001) wherein it was observed as under: the fact that the deceased was suffering from severe burn injuries does not necessarily lead to a conclusion that she was not in a position to inform the doctor about the said incident, particularly in the light of the deposition of the doctor who had conducted the post-mortem of the deceased that a patient who has sustained 98% burn injuries can remain conscious for sometime after ..... . state of west bengal (2012) 4 scc352 the supreme court made the following observation regarding the necessity of a tip in the context of the accused person being previously kown to the witnesses: .....the appellant and the four eye witnesses belonged to the same locality and the four eye witnesses knew the appellant before the incident and were able to immediately identify the appellant at the time of the incident ..... . republic of india 2004 cri lj224(sj-orissa), held as under: section 6 of the commissions of inquiry act guarantees immunity to a witness ..... . he then states that kamre mein weh meri ladki suman ba umar 18 varsh ko aag laga kar kamre ko bahar se kunda laga ke jati sukar galian de rahe the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... this includes recovery of the tax in case the dealer fails to deposit the same under section 43 of the dvat act; forfeiture of security deposited under section 19 of dvat act read with rule 22 of the dvat rules; recovery of tax as arrears of land revenue whereby the commissioner prepares and issues to the defaulting selling dealer a recovery certificate and thereafter recovers the amount specified in the certificate by attaching the movable and immovable property of or even the arrest of the certificate-debtor; or appointing a receiver for the management of the movable and ..... or purposes of this act or any provision of this act, then the commissioner may, by order, declare the arrangement to be null and void as regard the application and purposes of this act and may, by the said order, provide for the increase or decrease in the amount of tax payable by any person or dealer who is affected by the arrangement, whether or not such dealer or person is a, party to the arrangement, in such manner as the commissioner considers appropriate so as to counteract any tax advantage obtained by that dealer from or under ..... muralidhar: judgment2610.2017 1.these writ petitions raise a challenge to the constitutional validity of section 9 (2) (g) of the delhi value added tax, 2004 ( dvat act ) as being violative of articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the constitution of india.2. ..... 359 itr565(kar. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... had come to a bona fide conclusion that the employee was guilty and the dismissal did not amount to unfair labour practice and was not intended to victimise the employee regard being had to the position settled by the decision of this court that though generally speaking the award of punishment for misconduct under the standing orders is a matter for the management to decide and the tribunal is not required to consider the propriety or adequacy of the punishment or whether it is excessive or too severe yet an inference ..... of mala fides may in certain cases be drawn from the imposition of unduly harsh, severe, shockingly unconscionable disproportionate ..... jitendea chandra kar and others 1971 1 llj sc543 the supreme court has held as under: 14. ..... (c) no.3633/2004, decided on 01.07.2010.13. ..... (c) no.13582/2004, decided on 03.01.2011 and delhi transport corporation vs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... 22.09.2015, that mci had not filed its report and, consequently, vide an order of even date, based on the assurance of the counsel for the mci that the report would be generated and sent to the central government, issued directions to the effect that the central government on receipt of the report by the mci (which was to reach by 24.09.2015), would hear the petitioners on 26.09.2015 and, thereafter, take a final decision in the matter by 28.09.2015. ..... we also direct the mci as well as the central government to consider the subject scheme submitted by the petitioner without being influenced by the communication dated 15.06.2015 issued under the signature of under secretary, government of india, ministry of health and family welfare, which is produced alongwith the written submission of respondent no.1, as we have construed that communication to be only a direction given that the petitioner college cannot enroll new students for the academic year 2015-2016 without formal permission issued by the central government in that ..... indisputably, the regulation on graduate medical education 1997, as amended on 25.02.2004, postulates that no admission of student in respect of any academic session beyond 30th september under any circumstance should be permitted nor the universities shall register any student beyond the said date. ..... (2005) 2 scc 65; priya gupta vs state of chhattisgarh and ors. .....
Tag this Judgment!