Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh rajya prashasnik adhikaran lambit avam nirakrit avedano ka antaran adhiniyam 2004 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.045 seconds)

U.K. Kesharwani Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2009(3)MPHT77(CG)

..... thereafter, the chhattisgarh rajya prashasnik adhikaran (lambit avam nirakrit avedano ka antaran) adhiniyam, 2004 (act no. ..... in the present case, the matter stands transferred to the high court of chhattisgarh as an effect of coming into force of sub-section (3) of section 3 of the act of 2004 and thereafter the learned single judge examined it on merits and found that since no part of cause of action arose in the territorial jurisdiction of the high court of chhattisgarh, the matter cannot be entertained in its writ jurisdiction under article 226 of constitution of india.10. ..... 5 of 2004) (hereinafter referred to as 'the act, 2004') came into force and the pending matters before the raipur bench of the administrative tribunal, including the matter of the appellant, were transferred to the high court of chhattisgarh by virtue of sub-section (3) of section 3 of the aforesaid act. ..... his submission was that by virtue of provisions of section 3 (3) of the act, 2004, the high court of chhattisgarh alone would have jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition of the appellant/petitioner.4. ..... agrawal argued that by virtue of sub-section (3) of section 3 of act, 2004, since a pending matter was transferred to the high court of chhattisgarh, the learned single judge ought to have entertained the petition and would have finally disposed of the same.9. .....