Court : Supreme Court of India
..... case may be, acquisition proceeding commenced under the mysore land acquisition act, 1894, the commencement of this act but not concluded before such commencement, may be continued under the land acquisition act, 1894 (central act 1 of 1894), as extended to the state of mysore by the land acquisition (mysore extension and amendment) act, 1961, and accordingly no acquisition so made, no proceeding held, no notification issued and no order made by the state government or by any authority under the mysore land acquisition act, 1894, or the land acquisition act, 1894, in connection with ..... courts. 602 (2002) 3 scc343603 ibid, at page 346 604 nandini sundar v state of chhattisgarh, (2011) 7 scc547458 part k337constitutional morality requires a government not to act in a manner which would become violative of the rule of law.605 constitutional morality requires that the orders of this court be complied with, ..... proportionality. 203 in modern dental college and research centre v state of madhya pradesh,355 a constitution bench of this court while dealing with a challenge to the vires of the madhya pradesh niji vyavasayik shikshan sanstha (pravesh ka viniyaman avam shulk ka nirdharan) adhiniyam, 2007, held that proportionality is the correct test to apply in the context of article .....
Tag this Judgment!