Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh cooperative societies recovery of losses act 2007 Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 3 results (0.057 seconds)

Phoneix Impex Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1998Raj100; 1998(1)WLC725; 1998(1)WLN131

..... the subject of co-operativesocieties is not included in the union list rather it comes in entry 32 of list ii of schedule vii appended to the constitution, and therefore, this argument cannot be allowed to prevail that the provisions of rajasthan act of 1965 dealing with recovery of the loans from its members by the cooperative societies arc violative of the provisions of the union list. ..... it is on the issuance of the notification that the appellant filed writ petition alleging that the amount shown in the notification was not outstanding against it and also that the bank could not recover the amount in accordance with the procedure laid down in the rajasthan cooperative societies act, 1965 as on 24th june, 1993 central act no. ..... it is formed and registered under the rajasthan cooperative societies act of 1965. ..... therefore, the proceedings of recovery were taken under the provisions of the rajasthan co-operative societies act (to be hereinafter referred to as 'the rajasthan act of 1965'). ..... 23 of 1965) which is to the following effect makes the position crystal clear:-- 'an act further to amend the reserve bank of india act, 1934 and the banking companies act, 1949 for the purpose of regulating the banking business of certain co-operative societies and for matters connected therewith.' 12. .....

State of Rajasthan Vs. Uka and ors.,

Court : Rajasthan

..... by the order dated 5.5.2005, the division bench hearing the appeal considered it appropriate to refer the matter to larger bench for reconsideration of the judgment rendered in asuram's case (supra), in view of the following arguments raised by learned counsel for the land development bank:(i) sub-section(1) of section 43 of the act of 1955 provides that a khatedar tenant may hypotheticate or mortgage his interest in the whole or part of his holding, for the purpose of obtaining loan from the land development bank of the state government or development bank or cooperative societies or any scheduled ..... therefore, the restriction imposed under section 14 (4) of the act and sub-rule (14) of rule 5 of the rules of 1976 not to alienate the property by sale by the bank except to members of sc/st is ultra vires, so also, contrary to provisions of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 because after enactment of the act of 1974, in which, section 3 is inserted enabling the sc/st cultivator to obtain financial assistance by creating charge or mortgage upon his land in favour of the bank and, in the event of recovery of dues by the bank under section 14 of the act of 1974, the restriction imposed under section 42 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 will .....

Bhanwarlal and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1985)ILLJ111Raj

..... before the industrial tribunal, one of the grounds raised on behalf of the banks was that the reference of the dispute to thetribunal was invalid, because such disputes were required to be referred for decision to the registrar of the cooperative societies under section 61 of the andhra pradesh co-operative societies act no. ..... industrial tribunals have the right even to vary contracts of service between the employer and the employees which jurisdiction can never be exercised by a civil court or a registrar acting under the cooperative societies act, so that the circumstance that in granting relief on issue no. ..... another reason which i can visualise for such a departure is that though, de jure as per the pronouncement of the apex court, the petitioner's cases would be treated as 'retrenchment' but as per the earlier view of insistence of surplusage, since the present removals were made on account of alleged loss of confidence and not surplusage, the bureaucracy was under the impression or moved under the impression that these are not cases of retrenchment and, therefore, section 25g of the act was not applied.135. ..... nil kumar das, 1970 lab ic 323 (cal) that a suit for recovery of damages for wrongful dismissal on the grounds which are clearly entertainable in civil court, would lie in that court even though a special remedy is provided in the act in respect of that matter. .....

Jodhpur Development Autho., Jodhpur Vs. State Consumer Disp. Red. Foru ...

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... . the appellant contested the claims of the respondents before the district forum raising a preliminary objection that consumer forum had no jurisdiction to decide the dispute between members and cooperative society in view of section 90 of the tamil nadu cooperative societies act, 1983.the hon'ble supreme upheld the applicability of consumer protection act 1986 to the housing cooperative society covered under the provisions of t.n.cooperative societies act, 1983 and held in para 12,18 & 19 as under:12 ..... . when the contractor or builder undertakes to erect a house or flat then it is inherent in it t hat he shall perform his obligation as agreed to.33.while dealing with the accountability of public authorities fortheir arbitrary and even ultra vires actions, the hon'ble supreme court upholding the compensation awarded against such housing cooperative society by the fora under the consumer protection act, held in para no.5 and 8 in case of lucknow development authority vs ..... . english case law on compensation & damages34.now certain references to english law on the compensationunder the torts law can also be discussed in the context of present case.compensation includes both the just equivalent for loss of goods or services and also for sufferance of injustice ..... 415/2007 came to be dismissed by the state consumer disputes redressal forum on 5/3/2008 vide ex. r/4/2. .....