Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh cooperative societies recovery of losses act 2007 Court: orissa Page 1 of about 2 results (0.033 seconds)

Sundargarh Citizen's Forum Vs. Orissa State Road Transport Corporation ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2009(I)OLR361

..... the question arose as to whether a condition imposed on the owner of the plot that he would sell the plot of land on which premises are constructed only to the members of the cooperative house building society and only with the prior consent of the government, such a condition may diminish the value of the land.33. ..... viewed in this manner, in which we find no conceptual difficulty or anachronism, we find no reason why the requirement of article 14 should not extend even in the sphere of contractual matters for regulating the conduct of the state activity..thus, every holder.of a public office is a trustee whose highest duty is to the people of the country and, therefore, every act of the holder of a public office, irrespective of the label classifying that act, is in discharge of public duty meant ultimately for public good. ..... the issue as to whether in such an eventuality, the highest bidder had any right to challenge the order of the government on the ground that the state suffered huge loss, was considered. ..... learned counsel for the corporation was not in a position to explain that even the tender notice was affixed on the notice board of some offices in pursuance of the order dated 24/29th march, 2007, how negotiations could take place prior to the said notices.55. ..... however, it was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 13.09.2007, this writ petition has been filed as a pil seeking the same relief on the grounds which had been taken in the earlier writ petition i.e. .....

Sachalabala Sethy and ors. Vs. Chief Secretary and Chief Development C ...

Court : Orissa

..... vyalikaval house building cooperative society limited and others, (2012) 10 scc 184 is concerned, the hon ble supreme court came to hold that the approval accorded by the state government for acquisition of land and the directions to the deputy commissioner to issue section 4(1) notification is held to be bad in law. ..... act, the court shall take into considerationfirst- the market-value of the land at the date of the publication of the (notification under section 4, sub-section(1); secondly, the damage sustained by the person interested, by reason of the taking of any standing crops or trees which may be on the land at the time of the collector s taking possession thereof; 57 thirdly, the damage (if any) sustained by the person interested, at the time of the collector s taking possession of the land, by reason of severing such land from his other land; fourthly, the damage (if any) sustained by the person interested, at the time of the ..... under the ipr, 2007 and in terms of the mou entered into between the state and the kvk, the benefits of the plant would enure to the benefit of the people of the state which is being starved of power and consequently no allegation of lack of public purpose . ..... while there can be no doubt that when land is acquired every persons who loss his/her land is emotionally disturbed and the relationship between the occupier of the land with the land is extremely intense and personal. ..... only at variable cost (which means non-recovery of fixed cost ). .....