Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the calicut university amendment amending act 1998 1 Court: us supreme court Page 15 of about 2,643 results (0.217 seconds)

Jan 11 2011 (SC)

Girnar Traders and Digambar Motiram Jhadhav. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... "reading the judgment in maharashtra srtc (supra) it appears to us that, the division bench in that case did not seem to agree with the proposition that was laid down in sant joginder singh (supra).4) (2003) 4 scc 2005) (1998) 2 scc 467there appears to be no good reason to shut out or preclude the amendments introduced by central act 68 of 1984 in the land acquisition act, 1894 from applying to an acquisition under chapter vii of the mrtp act. ..... this clearly shows that if complete machinery or mechanism is not provided under an act to ensure effective execution of the functions assigned therein with due protection of the rights of the interested persons within the framework of law, it may not be possible for the court to hold that such a statute is a self-contained code.it may not be possible to state parameters of universal application which could determine with precision as to whether an act is a self-contained code or not. ..... a pertinent constitutional aspect that ought to have been brought to the notice of different benches was that the federal structure of the constitution had come into force which controlled governance of the country and therefore the principles, inter alia, stated by the privy council could not be adopted as law of universal application without appropriately modifying the stated position of law to bring it in complete harmony with the constitutional mandate. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2002 (SC)

Bhavnagar University Vs. Palitana Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC511; (2003)2GLR234; (2003)2GLR258; JT2002(10)SC55; (2003)2SCC111; 2003(1)LC80(SC)

..... development plan or any other plan, secondly, by enacting sub-section (4) of section 126 that if a declaration is not made within the period referred to in sub-section (2) the state government may make a fresh declaration but, in that event, the market value of the land shall be the market value at the date of the declaration under section 6 and not the market value at the date of the notification under section 4, and thirdly, by section 127 that if any land reserved, allotted or designated for any purpose ..... the schedule to the act shows that section 23 of the land acquisition act is to stand amended for the acquisition under this act with regard to the compensation to be awarded. ..... it has not been disputed before us nor is it necessary to consider in the facts and circumstances of this case as to whether establishment of the educational institutions or universities would be covered by the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 12 thereof?30. ..... , : (1998)iillj604sc . .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1998 (SC)

Indian Railway Sas Staff Association and Others Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998IAD(SC)374; AIR1998SC805; JT1998(1)SC167; 1998(1)SCALE149; (1998)2SCC651; [1998]1SCR240; (1998)1UPLBEC599

..... , : (1998)1scc428 employees unions of various banks which were subsidiaries of the state bank of india under the state bank of india (subsidiaries banks) act, : (1998)1scc428 , better medical facilities and extra increments in their pay-scale on the ground that such benefits were available to the employees holding equivalent or similar ranks in the state bank of india. ..... against this part of the relief granted to the appellants by the tribunal, union of india came in appeal in this court and by judgment dated july 15, 1994 , the court reversed the decision of the tribunal and held that the appellants would be entitled to revised pay scales only with effect from 1.4.1987. ..... besides to our mind, there has never been complete parity between the railway staff and the audit/other accounts staff in the other departments and as observed earlier, nor any such case has been made out. ..... the question regarding number of posts to be placed in the higher scales of pay has been under the consideration of the government and it has now been decided that the ratio of number of posts in higher and lower scales in the organised accounts cadres as well as in accounts wing of the ia&ad; may be as follows:-(i) section officer (sg) rs. ..... 330-560 in all the audit and accounts cadres through staff selection commission/railway recruitment boards from amongst university graduates. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2000 (SC)

Anandi D. Jadhav (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Nirmala Ramachandra Kore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC1386; (2000)3GLR2754; JT2000(4)SC96; 2000(3)SCALE90; (2000)3SCC703; [2000]2SCR963; 2000(2)LC810(SC)

..... , 1973; (aa) to (bba)**** **** **** **** (c)(i) in relation to any premises let for residence, when the tenant dies, whether the death has occurred before or after the commencement of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control (amendment) act, 1978, any member of the tenant's family residing with the tenant at the time of his death, or, in the absence of such member, any heir of the deceased tenant, as may be decided in default of agreement by the court; (c){ii) **** **** **** **** the definition of tenant' is too exhaustive to include any member of the family residing with him. ..... holding that the alternate accommodation stood in the name of respondents 2 and 3 and the consideration for it was not provided by the first respondent the high court opined that she could not be said to have a suitable alternate residence and accordingly set aside the order of the district judge by allowing the writ petition on january 27, 1998. ..... 167 of 1998 before the high court. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2008 (SC)

United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Manubhai Dharmasinhbhai Gaj ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008ACJ2399; 2008(5)ALLMR(SC)928; (2008)3CALLT1(SC); (2008)3GLR2356(SC); (2008)5MLJ1006(SC); (2008)151PLR644; 2008(7)SCALE377; (2008)10SCC404; 2008AIRSCW7532; AIR2009SC446; 2008AIRSCW7532

..... - all the shares in the capital of the acquiring companies, being--(a) the national insurance company limited;(b) the new india assurance company limited;(c) the oriental insurance company limited;(d) the united india insurance company limited,and vested in the corporation before the commencement of the general insurance business (nationalisation) amendment act, 2002 shall, on such commencement, stand transferred to the central government.section 19 - functions of acquiring companies(1) ... ..... the national insurance company being one of the subsidiary companies of the general insurance company issued a letter dated 18th december, 1998, inter alia, in the following terms:different situations which may arise during the renewal of insurance and how to deal with them are summarized below:(1) in case of renewal without a break in the period the policy will be renewed including the disease contracted during the expiring policy period. ..... after over three years namely, in july, 1998, respondent no.1 suffered a coronary disease and was admitted in the escorts heart institute and research centre where he underwent `angioplasty'. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1997 (SC)

Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC3400; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)753; 1997CriLJ4059; 1997(3)Crimes301(SC); (1998)1GLR793; JT1997(7)SC695; 1997(5)SCALE667; (1997)7SCC622; [1997]Supp3SCR705

..... clause twelfth was added by the criminal law (amendment) act (2 of 1958) and was substituted, in its present form, by anti-corruption laws (amendment) act, 1964 (11 of 1964). ..... lalit, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has strenuously contended that the entire proceedings, namely, the proceedings before the trial court as also the high court are liable to be set aside as there was no valid sanction within the meaning of section 6 of the prevention of corruption act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') with the consequence that the trial court had no jurisdiction to take cognizance of these offences, much less try them. ..... this section places a bar on the court from taking cognizance of the offences specified in sub-section (1) against public servants unless the prosecution for those offences has been sanctioned either by the central government, if the person who has allegedly committed the offence, is employed in connection with the affairs of the union government and is not removable from his office except with the sanction of the central government, or by the state government if that person is employed in connection with the affairs of the state government. ..... in the vice-chancellor, utkal university and ors. v. s.k. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2009 (SC)

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Peoples Union for Civil Liberties, Kerala ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC573; 2009(10)SCALE25; (2009)8SCC46

..... therefore, if, as has been contended by the appellant, the high court in 1981 had in proceedings between the appellant and the revenue held that the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the deduction under section 80p(2)(a)(iii) of the act, and the revenue has not impugned the high court's decision, that decision binds the parties for the assessment years in question and cannot be reopened because of the 1998 amendment. ..... outside their original habitants, the same would not attract article 21 of the constitution of india, particularly when they would be getting 2 hectares of land as also grant for payment of compensation to the land holder in stead and place of repayable amount of loan as provided for in the 1975 act.vi) keeping in view the nature of mandamus issued by the high court in the earlier round of litigation, it would not mean that the state was not precluded from amending or repealing the 1975 act.vii) the decision of this court in madan ..... --(1) except as provided by sub-section (2), where any uttar pradesh act amends the text of any uttar pradesh act or regulation by the express omission, insertion or substitution of any matter, the amending enactment is subsequently repealed, the repeal shall not affect the continuance of any such amendment made by the enactment so repealed and in operation at the time of such repeal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 2008 (SC)

Glaxo Smith Kline Plc and ors. Vs. Controller of Patents and Designs a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW376; AIR2009SC1147; 2008(4)AWC3839(SC); 2008BusLR879(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(4)CHN197; LC2008(3)131; (2009)2MLJ548(SC); 2008(38)PTC1(SC); 2008(12)SCALE284; 2008(6)LHSC4364.

..... 1st january, 2005 there was no scope for further considering the question of emr as chapter iva of the act has been deleted and in section 78 of the amending act, it has been specifically made clear that all pending applications for grant of emr filed under chapter iv- a of the principal act which were pending on 1st january, 2005 should be treated to be a claim for patents covered under sub-section (2) of section 5 of the principal act and such application should be deemed to be treated as a request for examination ..... on january 1, 2005 the patent (amendment act), 2005 came into operation by which various amendments to the act were made and the chapter iv-a which provided the mode of adjudication of the claim of emr was totally deleted. ..... the learned single judge's view that the provisions of section 78 of the amendment act have no application to the proceedings which stood concluded before the appointed day appears to be the correct view governing the issue. ..... background facts giving rise to the filing of the writ petition were as follows:the writ petitioners filed an application for grant of patent under section 5(2) of the patents act, 1970 (in short the `act') on 28th august, 1998. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2007 (SC)

i.R. Coelho (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC861; 2007(1)ALLMR(SC)944; 2007(1)AWC689(SC); [2007(2)JCR148(SC)]; JT2007(2)SC292; 2007(1)KLT623(SC); (2007)3MLJ423(SC); 2007(1)SCALE197; (2007)2SCC1; 2007AIRSCW611; 2007(3)CivilLJ589; 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)480; 2007(2)KCCRSN44(SC)

..... it was declared that the parliament will have no power from the date of the decision (27th february, 1967) to amend any of the provisions of part iii of the constitution so as to take away or abridge the fundamental rights enshrined therein.soon after golak nath's case, the constitution (24th amendment) act, 1971, the constitution (25th amendment) act, act, 1971, the constitution (26th amendment) act, 1971 and the constitution (29th amendment) act, 1972 were passed.10. ..... had replaced the words 'of or any of the principles laid down in part iv' with 'the principles specified in clause (b) or clause (c) and article 39', justice chandrachud said:section 4 of the constitution (42nd amendment) act is beyond the amending power of the parliament and is void since it damages the basic or essential features of the constitution and destroys its basic structure by a total exclusion of challenge to any law on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19 of the constitution, if the law is for giving effect to the policy of the ..... . in 1998, the united kingdom adopted the human rights act which gave explicit affect to the european convention on human rights .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2008 (SC)

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534

..... accordingly, on point b, we hold:that having regard to the background and evolution of the principles underlying the constitution (52nd amendment) act, 1985, in so far as it seeks to introduce the tenth schedule in the constitution of india, the provisions of paragraph 7 of the tenth schedule of the constitution in terms and in effect bring about a change in the operation and effect to articles 136, 226 and 227 of the constitution of india and, therefore, the amendment would require to be ratified in accordance with the proviso to sub-article (2) of article 368 of the constitution of india.21. ..... as the act itself is based on the constitution (ninety-third amendment) act, 2005, the validity of the act depends on the fact whether the constitution (ninety-third amendment) act, 2005 itself is valid or not. ..... the 14th amendment to the constitution of the united states of america and title vi of the 1964 civil rights act, prohibit universities to discriminate on the basis of classifications such as race, colour, national origin and the like in all their operations. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //