Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the bhaskar textile mills acquisition and transfer act 1986 Court: orissa Page 2 of about 12 results (0.417 seconds)

Ajit Kumar Routray Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK In the matter of applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------Ajit Kumar Routray Pravash Ku. Sahoo BiNo.Ku. Sahoo Braja Kishore Sahoo Nrusingha Ch. Routray Pravash Kumar Sahoo Ajit Kumar Routray Avijit Panda W.P.(C) No.8084 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.8082 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.9531 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.9533 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.9549 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.7110 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.7111 of 2013 M/s Ramakanta Mohanty, D.Mohanty, S.Mohanty, D.Varadwaj, A.Mohanty, S.Mohanty, P. Jena & A.K.Das W.P.(C) No.9378 of 2013 M/s Gopal. Kr. Mohanty, P.K.Panda, D.Mishra & N.K.Khan Pradeepta Kumar Nath Yogesh Sahu & Ors. MaNo.Ku. Sahoo Bimala Dalabehera Aruna K. Sahoo and Another W.P.(C) No.8912 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.9558 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.10085 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.10731 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.8911 of 2013 M/s Narasingh Patra, A.K.Patra & B.Shadangi Gitanjali Sahoo Bipin Bihari Nayak W.P.(C)No.6351 of 2013 W.P.(C)No.10690 of 2013 M/s Kali Pr. Mishra, S.Mohapatra, T.P....

State of Orissa and anr. Vs. Fakir Ch. Sethy and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 108(2009)CLT519

S.R. Singharavelu, J.1. We have jointly heard FA No. 10 of 2001 & three other Writ Petitions i.e. W.P. 7437 of 2008, W.P. 7962 of 2008 & 8874 of 2008. The details of the suit against the decree of which FA had arisen is given below. The Plaintiffs in that suit are the sons of the person called Nidhi Sethi. In order to protect the decree, they have filed W.P. 7962 of 2008 ft W.P. 8874 of 2008. Their prayer in those Writ Petitions are that as they are entitled to the suit land, the allotment of the same or part of it by the State Govt. in favour of the Petitioner in W.P. 7437 of 2008 is illegal that it is to be cancelled; that the attempt made thereon to make construction is to be prevented & the allotment itself is to be quashed. On the contrary, the Petitioner in W.P. 7434 of 2008 prayed that the land never belonged to the Petitioners in the other Writ Petitions who are plaintiffs in the suit, that the settlement records in their favour shall be quashed as illegal & direction shall be ...