Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the adamas university act 2014 Court: gujarat Page 7 of about 309 results (0.070 seconds)

Apr 01 1968 (HC)

Bharat Sarvodaya Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Mohatta Brothers

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1969Guj178; (1969)GLR457

..... of this exception in rule 4 only to the case where the partner dies makes it amply clear that otherwise the provisions of section 45 of the indian contract act would normally prevail and any suit without joining all the partners or by the compendious use of the firm name without disclosing all the partners would obviously fail in fact in case of a death of a partner the number would be reduced and the second mandatory condition in section 69(2) would be fulfilled by the registered firm if the name of the deceased partner was already shown. ..... the fact that the firm was registered at the date of the institution of the suit and that the names of the persons suing, the firm being a compendious name for the persons suing, were shown in the register at the date of the institution of the suit appeared to be a compliance with section 69(2) of the act. ..... had raised the following points in his appeal :-- (1) the plaintiff-firm was not entitled to file a suit as the plaintiff firm was differently constituted from the firm of mchatta brothers as on 31-7-50, and in any event, as the minor shashikumar had become major in 1953 and had become a partner of the plaintiff-firm mohatta brothers, ahmedabad, and as even the name of satyavatidevi who was the partner suing did not appear in the entry in the register of firms the present suit was barred under section 69(2) of the act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2000 (HC)

Lalubhai Hirabhai Patel and anr. Vs. Indo-japan Industries and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2254

..... , the plaint of such suit should have been 'rejected by the learned judge of the trial court because the present suit clearly appears, from the statements in the plaint, to be time-barred by the limitation act, 1963. ..... 1 that rest of the amount of consideration of the lands would be paid 90 days after permission is granted by the government under section 76 of the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976. ..... 1 had agreed to execute a final sale deed within 90 days from the date of permission under section76 of the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976 which was to be obtained from the state government. ..... 1 did not want to act upon the satakhat and he has refused to execute a final sale deed. ..... 54 of part 2 of the schedule below limitation act, 1963, three years period of limitation is prescribed for a suit for specificperformance of a contract. ..... 54 of the limitation act, 1963 and thus, suit in which injunction has been granted, is ex-facie time-barred. ..... 54 of the limitation act, 1963 will be applicable to present case. ..... 54 of the limitation act, 1963, and therefore, plaint ought to have been rejected in view of provisions of order 7, rule ll(d). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 1964 (HC)

Ahmedabad Sarangpur Mills Company Ltd. Vs. Industrial Court, Ahmedabad ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1965)ILLJ155Guj

..... the learned judges examined the scheme of the bombay act and that of the industrial disputes act, 1947, and observing that the bombay act is materially different from the central act, held that the limitation placed by the supreme court in its decisions under the central act on the powers of interference of the industrial tribunals thereunder would not apply to the labour court under the bombay act. ..... though the decisions of the supreme court cited above were decisions under the industrial disputes act, 1947 relating to the power of adjudication the principle laid dawn relate to the industrial law and would aptly apply to the tribunals created under the bombay industrial relations act, especially as the act confers powers on them to examine the legality or propriety of orders passed by employers against their employees under powers conferred on them either by the contract of employment or by the standing orders. 26. ..... the only thing that happens under the industrial law is that since the court acts on equity and it is fair that the employer should be given an opportunity to satisfy the court that there was proper reason to terminate the services or to dismiss and the employer does so at the time of such enquiry by the court, it cannot be said that there was valid termination and therefore the employer would be liable to pay wages until the court is satisfied on an enquiry held by it that the workman was guilty of the charge against him. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Ashok Fashion Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2002(83)ECC410; 2002(141)ELT606(Guj)

..... that section 3(3) of the additional duties of excise act adopts, by reference, the provisions of the central excises and salt act, 1944 and the rules made thereunder and in view of such specific mandate, the legislation having already been made by incorporating the provision of the act of 1944 and the rules made thereunder by reference, it was not necessary to enumerate all the assessment, confiscation and penalty provisions which were applicable to the levy and collection of central excise duty under the act of 1944 and the rules framed thereunder. ..... we accordingly hold that the provisions relating to confiscation and imposition of penalty contained in the central excise act, 1944 and the rules thereunder are applicable to man-made fabrics which are liable to additional duty of excise under the first schedule of section 3(1) of the additional duties of excise act and are 'excisable goods' mentioned in schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985, by virtue of incorporation by reference under section 3(3) of the additional duties act, of all the provisions contained in the central excise act, 1944 rules made thereunder.13. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2012 (HC)

Mukesh V. Chavda and Another Vs. State of Gujarat and Others

Court : Gujarat

..... estimates are voted by the senate: (a) to reduce the amount of the budget grant. ..... administer the property and funds of the university; (ii) to enter into, vary, carry out and cancel contracts on behalf of the university in the exercise or performance of the powers and duties assigned to it by the act and the statutes, in consultation with the finance committee, if any, and the legal committee, if any, appointed by the syndicate; (iii) to determine the form, provide for the custody and regulate the use, of the common seal of the university; (iv) to administer funds placed at the disposal of the university for specific purposes; (v) to frame the annual financial estimates of the university and to submit them to the senate; (vi) after the financial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2013 (HC)

H.M. Manani Vs. State of Gujarat and Others

Court : Gujarat

..... in the said case of kanakray dave (supra), while dealing with section 20 of the gujarat university act, this court recorded that the university, prior to 09.12.1981, had power, interalia to fix the emoluments of its staff. ..... it is the grievance of the petitioner that, by doing so, the state authorities are nullifying the effect of general revision of pay which was adopted by the respondent university in the year 1981, which the university was competent to do and without interfering with the said decision of the university, the pay of the petitioner in his individual capacity, is not approved, which is illegal. ..... having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and having gone through the record, including various affidavit in replies filed on behalf of the authorities from time to time, this court finds that, the root cause of the entire controversy is that the government has objection, in principle, against the decision of the respondent university dated 29.01.1981, whereby the payscales of employees of the university were revised. ..... from the correspondence on record it transpires that, the exercise of power by the university under section 20 of the act with regard to emoluments of its employees was made subject to approval of the government vide notification dated 09.12.1981. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2004 (HC)

Gujarat University Vs. Gujarat University General Employees Union

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)104GLR1

..... it has been held as under :-'the terms and features of the scheme unmistakably indicates that the university - a centre of excellence chosen by the ministry of education, acts for and on behalf of government of india and the nodal centre is nothing but the reflection of central government acting through the media of university. ..... orders regarding appointment have been issued pursuant to the advertisement given by the petitioner under the signatures of the registrar of the petitioner and in the appointment letters it has been stated that they will have to work in accordance with the rules and regulations of the petitioner university would not mean that they are employees of the petitioner. ..... so far the pay-scales to be granted to the employees of the vidyapeeth was concerned, it was prescribed that the university could bring them down to the level of the corresponding posts under the state government, but not in any case increase to the university pattern or ..... it may also be worthwhile to note that so far the setting of shramik vidyapeeth at ahmedabad is concerned, it was decided to set it up in the premises of the gujarat university only for the time being; meaning thereby it was to have its own separate establishment ..... a very late stage discretion was given to bring it on par with the employees of the petitioner university as can be seen from letter dated 10th march, 1983. ..... india and it was nothing but an institution of the central government acting through the media of university. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1973 (HC)

Mirchumal Samandas and ors. Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1974Guj174

..... punjab refugees (registration of land claims) act, 1948 (east punjab act, xii of 1948) or under the patiala refugees (registration of land) (claims) ordinance 2004 (order 10 of 2004 bk) and verified by any authority appointed for the purpose b y the government of punjab, the government of patiala and east punjab states union, as the case may be, which has not been satisfied wholly or partially by the allotment of any evacuee land under the relevant notification specified in section 10 of this act, but does not include ...........'it is ..... not necessary to reproduce for the purpose of this judgment items (i) and (ii) which are excepted ..... .'the application of the latter part of this test renders the act of the authorities of selling the tenement in the occupation of the plaintiff ultra vires their powers because rule 42, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions specified therein, requires the authorities to transfer for value the tenement in occupation of a non-claimant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1993 (HC)

Umesh Laxmanbhai Patel Vs. Vice-chancellor, Sardar Patel University an ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1994Guj141

..... course in sardar patel university of anand, has prayed for an appropriate writ to direct the respondents, namely the vice-chancellor of the university and the director of post graduate institute of business management of the university, to treat him as having passed the first year m.b.a. ..... deprecating the interference on the part of the high court the supreme court ruled that the sub-rule prescribing houseman-ship in the same subject was not inconsistent with the existing ordinance and there is no jurisdiction on the part of the high court to interfere with the internal working the academicinstitution concerned with imparting, higher education in the field of post graduate course in medicine. ..... different methods inasmuch as somegave marks and then converted the total marks into grades, while others directly gave grade points; (iv) the deficit of .01 point in the grade point of the over all performance was quite negligible and the grade point 1.99 should have been rounded upto 2, in order that the student may not lose his previous year; (v) there is no provision of re-checking or re-assessment by the examiners and, therefore, the students are left high and dry even if they ..... zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950, which made the provision for computation of average annual income from forests on the basis of income of the preceding years and appraisement of the annual yield. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 1994 (HC)

In Re: Mafatlal Industries Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1995]84CompCas230(Guj)

..... of their respective groups be ordered and decreed to specifically perform the family arrangement mentioned in prayer (a) above and for the said purpose to do all acts, deeds and things as may be necessary for the purpose of placing the companies mentioned in exhibit 17 to the counter-claim under the management and control of the plaintiff to the counter-claim and for the said purpose to delink the shares and the said companies from the group b companies; (e) that the defendants to the counter-claim, their nominees and members of their respective ..... the provision is enacted in the interests of the shareholders so that the material facts concerning the item of business to be transacted at the meeting are before the shareholders and they also know what is the nature of the concern or interest of the management in such item of business, the idea being that the shareholders may not be duped by the management and may not be persuaded to act in the manner desired by the management unless they have formed their own judgment on the question after being placed in full possession of all material facts and apprised of the interest .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //