Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 3 the university Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 1,378 results (0.836 seconds)

Union Of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , (1974) 3 scc349[11].; k m sharma v. ito, (2002) 4 scc339[14].; m a merchant (supra) [8]. 61 dr premchandran keezhoth v. chancellor, kannur university, 2023 scc online sc1592[73]. 62 cit v. anjum m.h. ghaswala, (2002) 1 scc633[27].; state of u p v. singhara singh, 1963 scc online sc23[8 ..... the specified authority; explanation 3. for the purposes of this section, specified authority means the specified authority referred to in section 151.]. 20 section 148a, income tax act [it reads: section 148a. conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice under section 148. the assessing officer shall, before issuing any notice under section 148, ..... sanction or approval, or such other action, by whatever name called, by any authority, commission or tribunal, by whatever name called, under the provisions of the specified act; [ ]. and where completion of compliance of such action has not been made within such time, then, the time- limit for completion or compliance of such action shall .....

Opg Power Generation Private Limited Vs. Enexio Power Cooling Solution ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... it related to the payment of the proportionate theka money could be, and has been filed.9. the relevant portion of section 12 of the specific relief act (act 1 of 1877) reads as follows: the specific performance of any contract may in the discretion of the court be enforced 93 see footnote 85 94 first ..... the veracity of what it was certifying, even for marketing purposes, then it behaved dishonestly. the tribunal has no basis for assuming that the respondents would have acted in such a dishonest manner and thus, concludes that the respondents must have believed that the acc unit was operating satisfactorily when it issued that certificate. the ..... aside, the period between the commencement of the declaration and the date of the order of the court shall be excluded in computing the time prescribed by the limitation act, 1963 (36 of 1963), for the commencement of the proceedings (including arbitration) with respect to the dispute so submitted. 65 section 21. commencement of arbitral proceedings .....

Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Afcons Gunanusa Jv

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... more than one party put forth their claims 47 authored by ilias bantekas, pietro ortolani, shahla ali, manuel a. gomez and michael polkinghorne; published by the cambridge university press. arbitration petition no.5 of 2022 & ors. page 57 of 69 in same arbitration. the labels that are appended to these claims presented by opposing ..... declared by the legislature as fair and reasonable, which can be changed by mutual consensus, and not otherwise. further, post the enforcement of the arbitration amendment act, 2019 vide act 33 of 2019 on 30th august 2019, and insertion of sub- section (3a) to section 11, the proviso to the sub-section states that the ..... appropriate, the court, in terms of section 28(2) of the english arbitration act, 1996, and also while exercising power under section 63(4) of the aforesaid act, can examine the said question. the court can also 29 redfern and hunter on international arbitration, oxford university press, 6th edn., 2015, pg. 532- 537. 30 russell on arbitration, .....

Debananda Tamuli Vs. Smti Kakumoni Kataky

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... not filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights. as can be seen from the evidence on record, the appellant is carrying on business at tezpur. the respondent is working as a lecturer in university law college at gauhati. there is no dispute that from 1st july 2009 till date, they are staying separately.11. merely because on account ..... by the other party to the _____________ 3 substituted by act 68 of 1976 (w e f 27-05-1976) 6 marriage without reasonable cause and without the consent or against the wish of such party, and includes the wilful ..... to the deserting spouse to leave the matrimonial home. the view taken by this court has been incorporated in the explanation added to sub-section (1) of section 13 by act no.68 of 1976. the said explanation reads thus: 13. divorce. (1) 3 [explanation. in this sub-section, the expression desertion means the desertion of the petitioner .....

Nirma Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... class as those listed. 44. the meaning of the expression ejusdem generis was considered by this court on a number of occasions and has been reiterated in maharashtra university of health sciences and ors. vs. satchikitsa prasarak mandal & ors. [(2010) 3 scc 786] the principle is defined thus : the latin expression ejusdem ..... . this court in canara banks case (supra) reiterated the principle laid down in managing director, ecil, hyderabad & ors. vs. b. karunakar & ors. [(1993) 4 scc 727] here again, this court has reiterated that even an administrative order, which involved civil consequences, must be consistent with the rules of natural justice. the ..... shares in the ordinary course of business. the regulation provides exemption from regulation 10, 11 and 12 to scheduled commercial banks or public financial institutions acting as pledgees in the ordinary course of business, in order to facilitate their business operations. such acquisition of shares in normal circumstances is not with .....

Nirma Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... open offer need not be on account of impossibility only. in support of these submissions, he relied on municipal corporation of greater bombay vs. bharat petroleum corporation ltd.[6]. maharashtra university of health sciences & ors. vs. satchikitsa prasarak mandal & ors. [7]. and union of india & ors. vs. alok kumar [8]..38. we are unable to ..... the appeal and it is accordingly dismissed. .. . j.[surinder singh nijjar]. .j.[anil r. dave]. new delhi; may 09, 2013.-.---------------------- [1]. (2003) 4 scc 55.[2]. (1993) 4 scc 72.[3]. (2011) 2 scc 25.[4]. (2012) 2 scc 32.[5]. (1996) 4 scc 6.[6]. (2002) 4 scc 219.[7]. (2010) 3 scc 78 ..... that acquire shares in the ordinary course of business. the regulation provides exemption from regulation 10, 11 and 12 to scheduled commercial banks or public financial institutions acting as pledgees in the ordinary course of business, in order to facilitate their business operations. such acquisition of shares in normal circumstances is not with the intention .....

P.A. Inamdar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC3226; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)1030; 2005(5)ALT1(SC); 2005(4)AWC3864B(SC); 2005(5)BomCR859; 2005(4)CTC81; 2005(3)ESC373; [2005(4)JCR164(SC)]; JT2005(7)SC313; 2005(5)KarLJ16; 2005(6)SCC537

..... pai foundation, there were four oft quoted leading cases holding the field of education. they were unni krishnan v. state of andhra pradesh : [1993]1scr594, st. stephen's college v. university of delhi : air1992sc1630, ahmedabad st. xavier's college society v. state of gujarat : [1975]1scr173 and in re: kerala education bill, ..... after the decisions in pai foundation and islamic academy, in the states of kerala, karnataka, maharashtra and tamil nadu, their respective legislatures have passed acts regulating admissions and charging of fee in both aided and unaided minority and non- minority private educational institutions engaged in imparting education in professional, ..... foundation. such imposition of quota of state seats or enforcing reservation policy of the state on available seats in unaided professional institutions are acts constituting serious encroachment on the right and autonomy of private professional educational institutions. such appropriation of seats can also not be held to .....

i.i.T.T. College of Engineering Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3629; 2003(4)ALLMR(SC)795; JT2003(7)SC86; 2003(6)SCALE237; (2003)7SCC73; (2003)3UPLBEC2400

..... the administrator. in spite of our repeated query, none of the counsel was able to point out any provision either under the aicte act or the hp education act or university act permitting the authorities to take over the management of institution. however, laudable the objective behind the steps taken by the high court, it ..... act. this contention need not be considered in view of the latest stand taken by ..... secretary to government higher education : [2000]2scr1234 , the university should not have withheld the affiliation inspite of the approval given earlier by aicte. it is contended that the provisions of the aicte act and regulations will prevail over the provisions if any in the university act or state which are inconsistent with the provisions of the former .....

The Patna Municipal Corporation Vs. M/s Tribro Ad Bureau

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and; union of india v indo-afghan agencies ltd., (1968) 2 scr366 the relevant being paragraphs 10 and 246. mozley & whiteley's law dictionary (11th edn., 1993, p. 243): a pro rata payment to a grantor or lessor, on the working of the property leased, or otherwise on the profits of the grant or lease ..... authority v. steel authority of india, (2011) 4 scc450 , certain questions concerning royalty as determined under the provisions of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 now stand referred to a bench of nine judges, which reference is still pending consideration. however, none of those issues arise in the present matter. 16 that ..... in ghaswala (supra) is concerned, the question that arose for consideration therein was whether the settlement commission constituted under section 245-b of the income tax act, 1961 has the jurisdiction to reduce or waive the interest chargeable under sections 9 paragraph 57 of indsil hydro power and manganese limited (supra). 25 234-a .....

Khalsa University Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and published in the punjab government gazette (extraordinary) on 17th july 2017.20. the sor of the impugned act read thus: statement of objects and reasons the khalsa university (repeal) ordinance, 2017 aims to repeal the khalsa university act, 2016 with a view to protect heritage character of khalsa college, amritsar. the khalsa college, amritsar has, ..... proposal, issued a letter of intent to khalsa society for establishing and running the khalsa university, amritsar3. 3.4. on 7th november 2016, the punjab vidhan sabha passed the khalsa university act, 20164 (punjab act no.44 of 2016). the 2016 act received the assent of the hon ble governor of punjab on 7th november 2016 and the ..... petition being c.w.p. no.17150 of 2017 (o&m) is allowed and the khalsa university (repeal) act, 2017 is struck down as being unconstitutional. the consequent direction is also issued to the effect that the khalsa university act, 2016 would be deemed to be in force and status quo as it obtained on 29th may .....